Demonstrate the Equivalence of CT-P10 to MabThera With Respect to the Pharmacokinetic Profile in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Triad RA
Phase 1, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, 2-Arm, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Study to Demonstrate the Equivalence of CT-P10 to MabThera With Respect to the Pharmacokinetic Profile in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
2 other identifiers
interventional
154
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized,controlled, multicenter, 2-arm, parallel-group, double-blind, prospective, Phase 1 study is designed to demonstrate comparable pharmacokinetics in terms of AUC0-last and Cmax (after second infusion) between CT-P10 and MabThera in patients with active RA concomitantly treated with MTX during the Core Study Period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Feb 2012
Typical duration for phase_1 rheumatoid-arthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedMay 22, 2015
May 1, 2015
1.5 years
February 8, 2012
May 20, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
PK in terms of Cmax
maximum serum concentration
Up to Week 24
Study Arms (2)
MabThera
ACTIVE COMPARATORrituximab
CT-P10
ACTIVE COMPARATORrituximab
Interventions
1000 mg by intravenous (IV) infusion. Each patient may receive 2 courses of treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient has a diagnosis of RA according to the revised 1987 ACR classification criteria (Arnett et al 1987) for at least 6 months prior to randomization.
- Patient has active disease as defined by the presence of 6 or more swollen joints (of 66 assessed) and 6 or more tender joints (of 68 assessed), and serum CRP ≥1.5 mg/dL or an ESR ≥28 mm/hour.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is unresponsive or intolerable to more than 2 biologic agents.
- Patient has allergies or hypersensitivity to murine, chimeric, human, or humanized proteins.
- Patient has current or past history of chronic infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 or -2 or who has a positive result to the screening test for these infections.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Celltrionlead
Study Sites (1)
Hanyang University Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (2)
Yoo DH, Suh CH, Shim SC, Jeka S, Molina FFC, Hrycaj P, Wiland P, Lee EY, Medina-Rodriguez FG, Shesternya P, Radominski S, Stanislav M, Kovalenko V, Sheen DH, Myasoutova L, Lim MJ, Choe JY, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Kim SH, Park W. Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Up to Two Courses of the Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 Versus Innovator Rituximab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results up to Week 72 of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial. BioDrugs. 2017 Aug;31(4):357-367. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0232-7.
PMID: 28612179DERIVEDYoo DH, Suh CH, Shim SC, Jeka S, Cons-Molina FF, Hrycaj P, Wiland P, Lee EY, Medina-Rodriguez FG, Shesternya P, Radominski S, Stanislav M, Kovalenko V, Sheen DH, Myasoutova L, Lim MJ, Choe JY, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Kwon TS, Park W. A multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of CT-P10 and innovator rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Mar;76(3):566-570. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209540. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
PMID: 27624791DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
DaeHyun Yoo, M.D., Ph.D.
Hanyang University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2012
First Posted
February 17, 2012
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 22, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05