Neural Effects of Mindfulness Training on Attention
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine behavioral and neural changes resulting from Mindfulness Meditation Training (MMT), and to use this knowledge in advancing our understanding of the mechanisms of attention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2006
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 26, 2012
CompletedJanuary 26, 2012
November 1, 2007
2.9 years
September 20, 2006
July 20, 2010
December 20, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reaction Times on the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
Single digits (0-9) are flashed on the screen one by one. The number 3 is the target and all other digits are non-targets. The participant is asked to press the space bar for nontargets and withhold from pressing the space bar for the target.
9 weeks
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALMeditation training group-- received Mindfulness Based Stress Management from the Penn Program for Stress Management. The meditation practice initially emphasized attention to a single focus. For most concentrative exercises, this focus was the breath. The sensations of breathing were to be examined closely, and when attention wandered it was to be redirected back to the breath. In other exercises, the focus of attention was to be directed to sensations within specific body parts (body scan exercise) and sensations of walking (walking meditation). During the 5th week of classes, the mindfulness training was expanded to include some explicit training in receptive attention.
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORNutrition education group An active comparison condition involving nutrition education was offered. This course matched the mindfulness course in all dimensions including course duration, homework, psychosocial support, and teacher expertise. The course was taught by a nurse who had expertise in nutrition and offered a program described in the book, Nutrition for Life by Lisa Hark.
Interventions
8-week training course in mindfulness meditation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women (all races and ethnicities) between 18 and 40 years old
- Women of childbearing age with a negative pregnancy test within 48 hours of scanning
- In good health
- Right-handed
- Normal or corrected-to-normal vision
- English as a first language
- Able to understand and provide signed informed consent
- No history of metal in their body or other reasons why they could not undergo an Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- No history of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, encephalopathy or encephalitis, minimal-cognitive impairment or dementia, movement disorder such as Parkinson's disease, head trauma causing loss of consciousness, cancer involving the central nervous system
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Individuals with implanted metal or electronic devices that would prevent them from MRI scanning.
- Individuals with a history of neurologic dysfunction that would prevent performance on attentional tasks including: history of transient ischemic attacks, history of cerebral infarction, history of Binswanger's disease (or a history of hypertensive encephalopathy), history of intracranial hemorrhage, history of head trauma with loss of consciousness, history of encephalitis, history of extended exposure to any known neurotoxin, history of acquired cognitive impairment, history of normal pressure hydrocephalus, history of a cancer metastatic to the central nervous system, history of Parkinson's or other basal ganglia disease, history of Guillain-Barré syndrome or chronic or relapsing polyneuropathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Amishi Jha
- Organization
- University of Pennsylvania
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amishi P Jha, Ph.D.
University of Pennsylvania
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2006
First Posted
September 21, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
August 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2009
Last Updated
January 26, 2012
Results First Posted
January 26, 2012
Record last verified: 2007-11