Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between IVM and Minimal Stimulation IVF in Patients With PCOS
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is most common endocrinologic disease in women of reproductive age with incidence of 6.6 \~ 8%. About fifty percent of the patients with PCOS manifest subfertility and significant proportion of these woman need assisted reproductive technology (ART). These patients are very sensitive to gonadotropins during conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is high. In vitro maturation (IVM) is an emerging alternative option to conventional IVF for minimizing the risk of OHSS in patients with PCOS. Until now, several studies has been reported the favorable outcomes of oocyte maturation rate, fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate during IVM procedure. However, these results were from retrospective or observational study and there was no suitable randomized controlled trial (RCT). Therefore, this prospective RCT is aimed to compare and analyze the clinical outcomes between IVM and minimal stimulation IVF in women with PCOS, assessing if IVM is recommendable clinical practice or not.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedMarch 24, 2020
March 1, 2020
5.7 years
April 11, 2017
March 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical pregnancy rate
Clinical pregnancy was determined by observation of a gestational sac with fetal heart beat by transvaginal ultrasound scan.
At 6 weeks of pregnancy
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Incidence rate of Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)
Until three weeks later after hCG injection
Study Arms (2)
In vitro maturation (IVM)
EXPERIMENTALhCG primed in vitro maturation (IVM) procedure Gonadotropin is not used in this patient group If the endometrial thickness in 6mm or more and the mean diameter of largest follicle is 11 mm or less on menstrual cycle day 9 to 12 on ultrasonography, oocyte retrieval is planned two days later. Recombinant hCG injection (priming) is given 36 hour before oocyte retrieval, followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for oocyte fertilization. The biochemical pregnancy is confirmed by serum beta hCG 15 days later oocyte retrieval. The clinical pregnancy is confirmed when gestational sac is detected by transvaginal ultrasonography 3 weeks later oocyte retrieval.
Minimal stimulation IVF
ACTIVE COMPARATORminimal stimulation IVF procedure These patients are stimulated with 150 or less IU of recombinant Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) from menstrual cycle day 3 in GnRH antagonist protocol. If the mean diameters of two or more follicles are 17mm or more, oocyte retrieval is planned two days later. Recombinant hCG is triggered 36 hour before oocyte retrieval, followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for oocyte fertilization if needed. The biochemical pregnancy is confirmed by serum beta hCG 14 days later oocyte retrieval. The clinical pregnancy is confirmed when gestational sac is detected by transvaginal ultrasonography 3 weeks later oocyte retrieval.
Interventions
No gonadotropin is used, but hCG priming is utilized 36 hour before oocyte maturation.
IVF with minimal use of gonadotropin, i.e. 150 or less IU of recombinant FSH, followed by hCG triggering in GnRH antagonist protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women diagnosed with PCOS under age of 40 years (PCOS diagnosis is based on Revised 2003 Rotterdam criteria of PCOS)
You may not qualify if:
- severe male factor subfertility requiring testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or oligoasthenoteratozoospermia
- couples requiring preimplantation genetic screening or diagnosis
- women had undergone ovarian stimulation 30 days before assisted reproductive technology (ART)
- women with severe endometriosis or dysfunctional uterine bleeding
- women with severe uterine factor subfertility (ex. submucosal myoma, intramural myoma protruding endometrium, severe intrauterine adhesion, etc)
- women with ovarian malignancy
- women with severe tubal factor subfertility (ex. persistent hydrosalpinx even after surgery)
- women had undergone treatment of malignancy 5 years before screening of this trial
- women with history of thromboembolism
- women with age of 40 years or more
- women with stimulation dose over 150 IU of exogenous FSH
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CHA Universitylead
Study Sites (2)
CHA Fertility Center, Seoul station
Seoul, 04367, South Korea
CHA Gangnam medical center
Seoul, 06135, South Korea
Related Publications (9)
Siristatidis CS, Vrachnis N, Creatsa M, Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S. In vitro maturation in subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;(10):CD006606. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006606.pub3.
PMID: 24101529BACKGROUNDCha KY, Chung HM, Lee DR, Kwon H, Chung MK, Park LS, Choi DH, Yoon TK. Obstetric outcome of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated by in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2005 May;83(5):1461-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.044.
PMID: 15866585BACKGROUNDChoi MH, Lee SH, Kim HO, Cha SH, Kim JY, Yang KM, Song IO, Koong MK, Kang IS, Park CW. Comparison of assisted reproductive technology outcomes in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome: In vitro maturation, GnRH agonist, and GnRH antagonist cycles. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2012 Dec;39(4):166-71. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2012.39.4.166. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
PMID: 23346527BACKGROUNDChild TJ, Phillips SJ, Abdul-Jalil AK, Gulekli B, Tan SL. A comparison of in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization for women with polycystic ovaries. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Oct;100(4):665-70. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02193-2.
PMID: 12383531BACKGROUNDChian RC, Buckett WM, Tulandi T, Tan SL. Prospective randomized study of human chorionic gonadotrophin priming before immature oocyte retrieval from unstimulated women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2000 Jan;15(1):165-70. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.1.165.
PMID: 10611207BACKGROUNDSoderstrom-Anttila V, Makinen S, Tuuri T, Suikkari AM. Favourable pregnancy results with insemination of in vitro matured oocytes from unstimulated patients. Hum Reprod. 2005 Jun;20(6):1534-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh768. Epub 2005 Feb 3.
PMID: 15695312BACKGROUNDReavey J, Vincent K, Child T, Granne IE. Human chorionic gonadotrophin priming for fertility treatment with in vitro maturation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 16;11(11):CD008720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008720.pub2.
PMID: 27852101BACKGROUNDAboulghar MA, Mansour RT. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures. Hum Reprod Update. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):275-89. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmg018.
PMID: 12859048BACKGROUNDSiristatidis CS, Papapanou M, Maheshwari A, Vaidakis D. In vitro maturation in subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD006606. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006606.pub5.
PMID: 39912435DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
You Shin Kim, MD, PhD
Fertility center of CHA Gangnam medical center, CHA university
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2017
First Posted
May 1, 2017
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
March 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share