NCT00271154

Brief Summary

Heart failure is a progressive disease that decreases the pumping action of the heart. This may cause a backup of fluid in the heart and may result in heart beat changes. When there are changes in the heart beat sometimes an implantable heart device is used to control the rate and rhythm of the heart beat. The purpose of the REVERSE clinical trial is to determine whether pacing in both the left and right ventricles using Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) can help slow the progression of heart failure in people who have mild or previous symptoms and poor heart pumping function. This kind of therapy has previously been shown to reduce symptoms and improve exercise capacity in people with more advanced forms of heart failure.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
684

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable heart-failure

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2004

Longer than P75 for not_applicable heart-failure

Geographic Reach
15 countries

65 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2004

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 21, 2005

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 30, 2005

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2007

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 13, 2009

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

January 30, 2012

Status Verified

January 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

December 21, 2005

Results QC Date

December 24, 2008

Last Update Submit

January 26, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Heart FailureImplantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorCardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Patients Worsened for Clinical Composite Response

    Patients considered worsened if they died, were hospitalized with worsening heart failure (HF), crossed over to other arm, demonstrated worsening in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, or reported moderately/markedly worse HF symptoms compared to before CRT implant.

    12 Months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume, Indexed (LVESVi)

    Baseline to 12 months

Study Arms (2)

CRT OFF

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) turned OFF in conjunction with optimal medical therapy

Device: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Device or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) with CRT

CRT ON

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) turned ON in conjunction with optimal medical therapy

Device: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Device or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) with CRT

Interventions

All randomized patients will be implanted with a market-released Medtronic CRT or CRT/ICD device.

CRT OFFCRT ON

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects with previously symptomatic heart failure but no current symptoms (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I, Stage C) or subjects with mild heart failure that only sometimes interferes with daily activities (NYHA Class II)
  • Subjects with a QRS of 120 ms or more (The QRS interval is a measurement of how the electrical signal involved in a heart beat travels/conducts through the ventricles. A wide QRS (120 ms or more) suggests that there is a conduction problem (or block) in the ventricles).
  • Subjects with a left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 40%. (The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a measurement of how well the left ventricle pumps blood out to the rest of the body. The higher the LVEF the more blood the ventricle is pumping.)
  • Subjects with a left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) greater than or equal to 55. (The left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) is a measurement of heart size taken during an echocardiogram that is one indication of the health of the left ventricle.)

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who are pacemaker dependent (heart would not beat without the help of an implanted device to pace it).
  • Subjects with heart failure that severely limits daily activities (NYHA Class III) or subjects with severe heart failure with symptoms while resting (NYHA Class IV).
  • Subjects hospitalized due to heart failure within past 3 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (65)

Unknown Facility

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Redwood City, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlantis, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

East Syracuse, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Manhasset, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Marion, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Doylestown, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sankt Pölten, Austria

Location

Unknown Facility

Weiner Neustadt, Austria

Location

Unknown Facility

Leuven, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Brno, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Olomouc, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Aalborg, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Aarhus, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Copenhagen, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Odense, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Lyon, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Marseille, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Montpellier, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Nantes, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Rennes, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Bochum, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hanover, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Budapest, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Szeged, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Dublin, Ireland

Location

Unknown Facility

Busto Arsizio, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Florence, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Milan, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Rome, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Kristiansand, Norway

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Valencia, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Linköping, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Stockholm, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Blackpool, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Linde C, Abraham WT, Gold MR, St John Sutton M, Ghio S, Daubert C; REVERSE (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction) Study Group. Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 2;52(23):1834-1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.027. Epub 2008 Nov 7.

  • Linde C, Gold M, Abraham WT, Daubert JC; REVERSE Study Group. Baseline characteristics of patients randomized in The Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling In Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Congest Heart Fail. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):66-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2008.07613.x.

  • Gold MR, Abraham WT, Butler J, Zile MR, Kahwash R, Gerritse B, Linde C. Win ratio analysis of the REVERSE cardiac resynchronization trial. Heart Rhythm. 2025 Dec;22(12):3042-3049. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.04.059. Epub 2025 May 3.

  • Fudim M, Dalgaard F, Friedman DJ, Abraham WT, Cleland JGF, Curtis AB, Gold MR, Kutyifa V, Linde C, Ali-Ahmed F, Tang A, Olivas-Martinez A, Inoue LYT, Al-Khatib SM, Sanders GD. Comorbidities and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Patient-level meta-analysis from eight clinical trials. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;26(4):1039-1046. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3029. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

  • Friedman DJ, Al-Khatib SM, Dalgaard F, Fudim M, Abraham WT, Cleland JGF, Curtis AB, Gold MR, Kutyifa V, Linde C, Tang AS, Ali-Ahmed F, Olivas-Martinez A, Inoue LYT, Sanders GD. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Intraventricular Conduction Delay But Not Right Bundle Branch Block: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Circulation. 2023 Mar 7;147(10):812-823. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062124. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

  • Gold MR, Rickard J, Daubert JC, Cerkvenik J, Linde C. Association of left ventricular remodeling with cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2023 Feb;20(2):173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.11.016. Epub 2022 Nov 25.

  • Gold MR, Rickard J, Daubert JC, Zimmerman P, Linde C. Redefining the Classifications of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the REVERSE Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Jul;7(7):871-880. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.11.010. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

  • Senfield J, Daubert C, Abraham WT, Ghio S, St John Sutton M, Cerkvenik J, Linde C, Gold MR. The Impact of the PR Interval in Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the REVERSE Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Aug;3(8):818-826. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

  • Linde C, Cleland JGF, Gold MR, Claude Daubert J, Tang ASL, Young JB, Sherfesee L, Abraham WT. The interaction of sex, height, and QRS duration on the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on morbidity and mortality: an individual-patient data meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;20(4):780-791. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1133. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

  • Gold MR, Padhiar A, Mealing S, Sidhu MK, Tsintzos SI, Abraham WT. Economic Value and Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Patients With Mild Heart Failure: Projections From the REVERSE Long-Term Follow-Up. JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;5(3):204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.10.014. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

  • St John Sutton M, Linde C, Gold MR, Abraham WT, Ghio S, Cerkvenik J, Daubert JC; REVERSE Study Group. Left Ventricular Architecture, Long-Term Reverse Remodeling, and Clinical Outcome in Mild Heart Failure With Cardiac Resynchronization: Results From the REVERSE Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;5(3):169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.11.012.

  • St John Sutton M, Cerkvenik J, Borlaug BA, Daubert C, Gold MR, Ghio S, Chirinos JA, Linde C, Ky B. Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Cardiac Remodeling and Contractile Function: Results From Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE). J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Sep 11;4(9):e002054. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002054.

  • Gold MR, Daubert JC, Abraham WT, Hassager C, Dinerman JL, Hudnall JH, Cerkvenik J, Linde C. Implantable defibrillators improve survival in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis of the long-term follow-up of remodeling in systolic left ventricular dysfunction (REVERSE). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;6(6):1163-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000570. Epub 2013 Oct 14.

  • Linde C, Daubert C, Abraham WT, St John Sutton M, Ghio S, Hassager C, Herre JM, Bergemann TL, Gold MR; REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) Study Group. Impact of ejection fraction on the clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Nov;6(6):1180-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000326. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

  • Cleland JG, Abraham WT, Linde C, Gold MR, Young JB, Claude Daubert J, Sherfesee L, Wells GA, Tang AS. An individual patient meta-analysis of five randomized trials assessing the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec;34(46):3547-56. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht290. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

  • Linde C, Gold MR, Abraham WT, St John Sutton M, Ghio S, Cerkvenik J, Daubert C; REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction Study Group. Long-term impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: 5-year results from the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Eur Heart J. 2013 Sep;34(33):2592-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht160. Epub 2013 May 2.

  • Gold MR, Thebault C, Linde C, Abraham WT, Gerritse B, Ghio S, St John Sutton M, Daubert JC. Effect of QRS duration and morphology on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in mild heart failure: results from the Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Circulation. 2012 Aug 14;126(7):822-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097709. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

  • Thebault C, Donal E, Meunier C, Gervais R, Gerritse B, Gold MR, Abraham WT, Linde C, Daubert JC; REVERSE study group. Sites of left and right ventricular lead implantation and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy observations from the REVERSE trial. Eur Heart J. 2012 Nov;33(21):2662-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr505. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

  • Gold MR, Linde C, Abraham WT, Gardiwal A, Daubert JC. The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in mild heart failure. Heart Rhythm. 2011 May;8(5):679-84. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.031. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

  • Linde C, Abraham WT, Gold MR, Daubert C; REVERSE Study Group. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic heart failure patients in relation to etiology: results from the REVERSE (REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic Left vEntricular Dysfunction) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 23;56(22):1826-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.055.

  • Linde C, Daubert C. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with New York Heart Association class I and II heart failure: an approach to 2010. Circulation. 2010 Sep 7;122(10):1037-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.923094. No abstract available.

  • St John Sutton M, Ghio S, Plappert T, Tavazzi L, Scelsi L, Daubert C, Abraham WT, Gold MR, Hassager C, Herre JM, Linde C; REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) Study Group. Cardiac resynchronization induces major structural and functional reverse remodeling in patients with New York Heart Association class I/II heart failure. Circulation. 2009 Nov 10;120(19):1858-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.818724. Epub 2009 Oct 26.

  • Daubert C, Gold MR, Abraham WT, Ghio S, Hassager C, Goode G, Szili-Torok T, Linde C; REVERSE Study Group. Prevention of disease progression by cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: insights from the European cohort of the REVERSE (Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 10;54(20):1837-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.011. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Interventions

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyDefibrillators, Implantable

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiac Pacing, ArtificialElectric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsDefibrillatorsElectrodesElectrical Equipment and SuppliesEquipment and SuppliesElectrodes, ImplantedProstheses and Implants

Results Point of Contact

Title
CRDM Core Clinical
Organization
Medtronic CRDM

Study Officials

  • Cecilia Linde, MD, PhD

    Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2005

First Posted

December 30, 2005

Study Start

September 1, 2004

Primary Completion

October 1, 2007

Study Completion

November 1, 2011

Last Updated

January 30, 2012

Results First Posted

May 13, 2009

Record last verified: 2012-01

Locations