Model 4396 Left Ventricular (LV) Lead Study
4396
Model 4396 Left Ventricular Lead Study
1 other identifier
interventional
197
7 countries
30
Brief Summary
This study is designed to show that a new lead, which paces the left bottom chamber (left ventricle) of the heart, is safe and effective. Using a lead on the left side of the heart has been shown to potentially improve heart failure symptoms. The shape and size of this new lead may make it a good choice for patients or physicians.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Mar 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable heart-failure
30 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 5, 2011
CompletedFebruary 18, 2019
January 1, 2019
4 months
February 26, 2009
August 25, 2011
January 31, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Safety (Subjects Without a Model 4396 Lead Related Complication)
A subject who was free of a Model 4396 lead related complication by the one month visit. All adverse events (AE) in the time frame were recorded at the subject's center and assessed by a centralized Adverse Event Advisory Committee (AEAC). The AEAC determined whether an AE was a complication and whether the event was related to the Model 4396 lead. A complication is an AE that results in death, termination of significant device function or invasive intervention (any therapy that penetrates the skin including administration of intramuscular (IM) and parenteral (IV) fluids).
One month
Efficacy: Distal Tip Electrode Voltage Threshold
Subjects' distal tip electrode voltage threshold was collected at the one month visit. The Model 4396 was considered effective if the mean voltage threshold was less than 3.0 Volts. Voltage threshold was collected using LV tip to Right Ventricular (RV) coil configuration at 0.5 milliseconds \[ms\]. Voltage threshold is the minimum energy required from the device to consistently pace the ventricle.
One month
Efficacy: Proximal Ring Voltage Threshold
Subject's proximal ring electrode voltage threshold was collected at the three months visit. The Model 4396 was considered effective if the mean voltage threshold was less than 3.0 Volts.
Three months
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Model 4396 Lead
During implant procedure.
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Any Transvenous LV Lead After Cannulation
During implant procedure.
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Any Transvenous LV Lead
During implant procedure.
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Any Medtronic Attain Family LV Lead
During implant procedure.
Cannulation Time
During implant procedure.
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Model 4396 LV Lead
EXPERIMENTALNon-randomized study.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- CRT/Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D) indications, New York Heart Association (NYHA) III and IV, indicated for implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) if CRT-D is implanted, patient consent, geographically stable
You may not qualify if:
- LV lead implant attempt in last 30 days, unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction (MI) in past 30 days, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in past 3 months, contraindicated for transvenous pacing, heart transplant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (31)
Unknown Facility
Pasadena, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Sacramento, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlantis, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Hinsdale, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Davenport, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Liverpool, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
York, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Bendigo, Australia
Unknown Facility
Linz, Austria
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Aarhus, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Nantes, France
Unknown Facility
Toulouse, France
Unknown Facility
Treviso, Italy
Unknown Facility
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- 4396 Clinical Research Specialist
- Organization
- Medtronic, Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Derek Exner, MD
Foothills Hospital (University of Calgary)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Gras, MD
Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2009
First Posted
March 2, 2009
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
July 1, 2009
Study Completion
August 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 18, 2019
Results First Posted
December 5, 2011
Record last verified: 2019-01