NCT00242580

Brief Summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination treatments in wet age-related macular degeneration. The combination treatment consists of verteporfin photodynamic therapy and either triamcinolone acetonide or pegaptanib added as an intravitreal injection.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
111

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2005

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 19, 2005

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 20, 2005

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2008

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 2, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

March 31, 2016

Status Verified

March 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

October 19, 2005

Results QC Date

January 24, 2011

Last Update Submit

March 3, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

AMDage-related macular degenerationchoroidal neovascularization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Participants Who Lose Less Than 15 Letters of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at 12 Months From Baseline.

    BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. A decrease in score indicates worsening of vision. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who lost less than 15 letters of visual acuity at 12 months as compared with baseline.

    Baseline to Month 12

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Percentage of Participants With Gain of 5 or More Letters of Best Corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline to Month 12

    Baseline to Month 12

  • Percentage of Participants With Gain of BCVA of 10 or More Letters at 12 Months

    Baseline to Month 12

  • Percentage of Participants With Gain of BCVA Score of 15 or More Letters at Month 12

    Baseline to Month 12

  • Number of Participants Requiring Verteporfin Treatment Throughout the Study

    Baseline to Month 12

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Lesion at 12 Months

    Baseline to Month 12

Study Arms (3)

Verteporfin and Triamcinolone 1 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received Verteporfin photodynamic therapy and 1 mg triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injection at the baseline visit. After the baseline visit, these participants received Verteporfin and triamcinolone acetonide 1 mg at every 3 month visit up to Month 9 only if leakage was detected on the fluorescein angiogram. At the 1.5, 4.5, 7.5 and 10.5 month follow-up visits participants received a sham injection. Starting from Month 12, if patients experienced ≥ 10 letters vision loss from the previous visit, they were treated at the investigators' discretion with available standard of care therapy.

Drug: Verteporfin photodynamic therapyDrug: Triamcinolone acetonide

Verteporfin and Triamcinolone 4 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received Verteporfin photodynamic therapy and 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injection at the baseline visit. After the baseline visit, these participants received Verteporfin and triamcinolone acetonide 4 mg at every 3 month visit up to Month 9 only if leakage was detected on the fluorescein angiogram. At the 1.5, 4.5, 7.5 and 10.5 month follow-up visits participants received a sham injection. Starting from Month 12, if patients experienced ≥ 10 letters vision loss from the previous visit, they were treated at the investigators' discretion with available standard of care therapy.

Drug: Verteporfin photodynamic therapyDrug: Triamcinolone acetonide

Verteporfin and Pegaptanib

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received Verteporfin photodynamic therapy and 0.3 mg Pegaptanib at the baseline visit. After the baseline visit, these participants received pegaptanib every 1.5 months up until and including the 10.5 month visit. After the baseline visit, these participants also received verteporfin at every 3 month visit up to Month 9 only if leakage was detected on the fluorescein angiogram. Starting from Month 12, if participants experienced ≥ 10 letters vision loss from the previous visit, they were treated at the investigator's discretion with available standard of care therapy.

Drug: Verteporfin photodynamic therapyDrug: Pegaptanib

Interventions

After a 10-minute intravenous infusion of verteporfin at a dose of 6 mg/m\^2 body surface area, verteporfin was activated by light application of 50 J/cm\^2 to the study eye, begun 15 minutes after the start of infusion.

Also known as: Visudyne
Verteporfin and PegaptanibVerteporfin and Triamcinolone 1 mgVerteporfin and Triamcinolone 4 mg

Pegaptanib sodium 0.3 mg administered by intravitreal injection.

Also known as: Macugen
Verteporfin and Pegaptanib

Triamcinolone acetonide administered by intravitreal injection.

Also known as: Kenalog-40®
Verteporfin and Triamcinolone 1 mgVerteporfin and Triamcinolone 4 mg

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age \>50
  • all types of untreated subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD
  • lesion size \<5400 microns in greater linear dimension (GLD)

You may not qualify if:

  • have a history of prior photodynamic therapy, external beam radiation, subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation, submacular surgery, or transpupillary thermotherapy
  • known allergy to verteporfin, triamcinolone or pegaptanib
  • have received prior treatment with Macugen, or other anti-angiogenic compound or any investigational treatment (e.g. Ruboxistaurin, Lucentis \[ranibizumab\], Retaane \[anecortave acetate\], squalamine, siRNA, VEGF-Trap etc.) for neovascular AMD
  • have the presence of fibrosis, hemorrhage, pigment epithelial detachments, tear (tip) of the retinal pigment epithelium or other hypoflourescent lesions obscuring greater than 50% of the CNV lesion
  • have had previous pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Novartis Investigational Site

Austin, Texas, 78793, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Macular DegenerationChoroidal Neovascularization

Interventions

VerteporfinpegaptanibTriamcinolone AcetonideTriamcinolone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Retinal DegenerationRetinal DiseasesEye DiseasesChoroid DiseasesUveal DiseasesNeovascularization, PathologicMetaplasiaPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PorphyrinsTetrapyrrolesPyrrolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingMacrocyclic CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsSteroids, Fluorinated

Limitations and Caveats

Secondary outcome measures were to be assessed at Month 6 and at 24 months. However, this study was not completed but terminated after all patients completed 12 months. Original safety was COSTART now mapped to SOC MedDRA.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Director
Organization
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study Officials

  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2005

First Posted

October 20, 2005

Study Start

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion

January 1, 2008

Last Updated

March 31, 2016

Results First Posted

May 2, 2011

Record last verified: 2016-03

Locations