A Safety and Efficacy Study Comparing the Combination Treatments of Verteporfin Therapy Plus One of Two Different Doses of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide and the Verteporfin Therapy Plus Intravitreal Pegaptanib
VERITAS
A 24-month Randomized, Double-masked, Sham Controlled, Multicenter, Phase IIIB Study Comparing Photodynamic Therapy With Verteporfin (Visudyne®) Plus Two Different Dose Regimens of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide (1 mg and 4 mg) Versus Visudyne® Plus Intravitreal Pegaptanib(Macugen®) in Patients With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration
1 other identifier
interventional
111
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination treatments in wet age-related macular degeneration. The combination treatment consists of verteporfin photodynamic therapy and either triamcinolone acetonide or pegaptanib added as an intravitreal injection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 2, 2011
CompletedMarch 31, 2016
March 1, 2016
2.3 years
October 19, 2005
January 24, 2011
March 3, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Who Lose Less Than 15 Letters of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at 12 Months From Baseline.
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. A decrease in score indicates worsening of vision. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who lost less than 15 letters of visual acuity at 12 months as compared with baseline.
Baseline to Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Percentage of Participants With Gain of 5 or More Letters of Best Corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline to Month 12
Baseline to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Gain of BCVA of 10 or More Letters at 12 Months
Baseline to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Gain of BCVA Score of 15 or More Letters at Month 12
Baseline to Month 12
Number of Participants Requiring Verteporfin Treatment Throughout the Study
Baseline to Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Lesion at 12 Months
Baseline to Month 12
Study Arms (3)
Verteporfin and Triamcinolone 1 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received Verteporfin photodynamic therapy and 1 mg triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injection at the baseline visit. After the baseline visit, these participants received Verteporfin and triamcinolone acetonide 1 mg at every 3 month visit up to Month 9 only if leakage was detected on the fluorescein angiogram. At the 1.5, 4.5, 7.5 and 10.5 month follow-up visits participants received a sham injection. Starting from Month 12, if patients experienced ≥ 10 letters vision loss from the previous visit, they were treated at the investigators' discretion with available standard of care therapy.
Verteporfin and Triamcinolone 4 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received Verteporfin photodynamic therapy and 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injection at the baseline visit. After the baseline visit, these participants received Verteporfin and triamcinolone acetonide 4 mg at every 3 month visit up to Month 9 only if leakage was detected on the fluorescein angiogram. At the 1.5, 4.5, 7.5 and 10.5 month follow-up visits participants received a sham injection. Starting from Month 12, if patients experienced ≥ 10 letters vision loss from the previous visit, they were treated at the investigators' discretion with available standard of care therapy.
Verteporfin and Pegaptanib
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received Verteporfin photodynamic therapy and 0.3 mg Pegaptanib at the baseline visit. After the baseline visit, these participants received pegaptanib every 1.5 months up until and including the 10.5 month visit. After the baseline visit, these participants also received verteporfin at every 3 month visit up to Month 9 only if leakage was detected on the fluorescein angiogram. Starting from Month 12, if participants experienced ≥ 10 letters vision loss from the previous visit, they were treated at the investigator's discretion with available standard of care therapy.
Interventions
After a 10-minute intravenous infusion of verteporfin at a dose of 6 mg/m\^2 body surface area, verteporfin was activated by light application of 50 J/cm\^2 to the study eye, begun 15 minutes after the start of infusion.
Pegaptanib sodium 0.3 mg administered by intravitreal injection.
Triamcinolone acetonide administered by intravitreal injection.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age \>50
- all types of untreated subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD
- lesion size \<5400 microns in greater linear dimension (GLD)
You may not qualify if:
- have a history of prior photodynamic therapy, external beam radiation, subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation, submacular surgery, or transpupillary thermotherapy
- known allergy to verteporfin, triamcinolone or pegaptanib
- have received prior treatment with Macugen, or other anti-angiogenic compound or any investigational treatment (e.g. Ruboxistaurin, Lucentis \[ranibizumab\], Retaane \[anecortave acetate\], squalamine, siRNA, VEGF-Trap etc.) for neovascular AMD
- have the presence of fibrosis, hemorrhage, pigment epithelial detachments, tear (tip) of the retinal pigment epithelium or other hypoflourescent lesions obscuring greater than 50% of the CNV lesion
- have had previous pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticalslead
- QLT Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Novartis Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78793, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Secondary outcome measures were to be assessed at Month 6 and at 24 months. However, this study was not completed but terminated after all patients completed 12 months. Original safety was COSTART now mapped to SOC MedDRA.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2005
First Posted
October 20, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2005
Primary Completion
January 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 31, 2016
Results First Posted
May 2, 2011
Record last verified: 2016-03