Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Without and With Defibrillator Feedback
Can the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improve With Direct Online Feedback From the Defibrillator to the Rescuers on Their Resuscitation Efforts
2 other identifiers
interventional
300
3 countries
3
Brief Summary
Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affect patient survival. Quality of professional CPR on patients has not been studied in detail, but it is regularly reported that the quality when tested on manikins deteriorates dramatically within months after training. Automated direct feedback on CPR quality from manikins brings quality back within a couple of minutes. Similar feedback has been incorporated into a defibrillator which also monitors quality of CPR. We hypothesise that quality of professional clinical CPR improves with such feedback
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2002
Typical duration for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2006
CompletedAugust 27, 2007
August 1, 2007
August 29, 2005
August 24, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
fraction of time without CPR
chest compression depth
chest compression frequency
chest compression/decompression duty cycle
ventilation frequency
Secondary Outcomes (1)
rate of return of spontaneous circulation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cardiac arrest out-of-hospital
You may not qualify if:
- \< 18 years old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Oslolead
- Laerdal Medicalcollaborator
- Ullevaal University Hospitalcollaborator
- Health Region East, Norwaycollaborator
- Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundationcollaborator
- London Ambulance Servicecollaborator
- Stockholm Ambulance Servicecollaborator
- University of Chicagocollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Ulleval University Hospital
Oslo, N-0407, Norway
Stockholm Ambulance Service
Stockholm, Sweden
London Ambulance Service
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Sorebo H, Svensson L, Fellows B, Steen PA. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2005 Jan 19;293(3):299-304. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.3.299.
PMID: 15657322RESULTKramer-Johansen J, Edelson DP, Abella BS, Becker LB, Wik L, Steen PA. Pauses in chest compression and inappropriate shocks: a comparison of manual and semi-automatic defibrillation attempts. Resuscitation. 2007 May;73(2):212-20. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.09.006. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
PMID: 17241734DERIVEDKramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Wik L, Fellows B, Svensson L, Sorebo H, Steen PA. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study. Resuscitation. 2006 Dec;71(3):283-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.05.011. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
PMID: 17070980DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Petter A Steen
University of Oslo, Ulleval University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2005
First Posted
August 30, 2005
Study Start
March 1, 2002
Study Completion
June 1, 2006
Last Updated
August 27, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-08