Ketamine Versus Fentanyl as an Adjunct to Propofol-Assisted Emergency Department Procedural Sedation
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We, the investigators at Queen's University, propose to conduct a randomized, double-blind, feasibility trial comparing low-dose ketamine versus fentanyl as adjuncts to Emergency Department procedural sedation with propofol. The outcomes of interest will be safety, with respect to hemodynamic and respiratory adverse effects, as well as efficacy, with respect to adequacy of sedation and analgesia, recovery profiles and patient/physician satisfaction. Our hypothesis, based on a review of existing anesthesia literature, is that low-dose ketamine may be a safer and more efficacious alternative to fentanyl when used as an adjunct to propofol-assisted procedural sedation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2004
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2006
CompletedJune 14, 2007
April 1, 2006
August 26, 2005
June 13, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome of interest in this study will be the incidence and severity of adverse events during procedural sedation, characterized by using an ordered, four-point categorical scale of airway, ventilatory and hemodynamic adverse events.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The secondary outcome measures of this study will be: the incidence and type of individual adverse events listed in the primary outcome
the dose of propofol administered during the procedure
times from study drug administration to: beginning of procedure, end of procedure, recovery of appropriate verbal response, Emergency Department discharge, incidence of any adverse event(s)
successful completion of the procedure
the operator's rating of the sedation
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals presenting or referred to the Emergency Department at Kingston General Hospital with a fracture or dislocation requiring manipulation under procedural sedation; or abscess requiring incision and drainage under procedural sedation.
- Ability to provide informed consent according to institutional requirements.
- Ability to comprehend and communicate in English.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 14 or \> 65 years
- Any history of significant active cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease, as determined by patient history, chart review, or emergency physician.
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification greater than class II.
- Body mass \> 130 kg.
- A history of physician-diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea.
- Chronic use of opioids including methadone and buprenorphine.
- A self-reported history of recent substance abuse or prior opioid dependence.
- Acute intoxication with drugs or alcohol, based on the judgement of the attending physician.
- A history of psychotic disorders, as reported by subjects or identified on review of the medical records.
- A known history of allergy or sensitivity to any study medication.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Messenger DW, Murray HE, Dungey PE, van Vlymen J, Sivilotti ML. Subdissociative-dose ketamine versus fentanyl for analgesia during propofol procedural sedation: a randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;15(10):877-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00219.x. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
PMID: 18754820DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marco LA Sivilotti, MD, MSc
Queen's University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2005
First Posted
August 29, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2004
Study Completion
August 1, 2006
Last Updated
June 14, 2007
Record last verified: 2006-04