Ketamine Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Prospective Study on the Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Ketamine to Midazolam-Sufentanil Sedation Regimen in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- Adequate sedation is of paramount importance to avoid stress and pain in mechanically ventilated patients. It is usually achieved by infusing sedatives (benzodiazepine) and analgesic (opiate) drugs.
- This combined sedation may not be sufficient in some instances.
- The aim of this study is to evaluate whether addition of a third substance, ketamine, allows the achievement of better sedation and avoids the use of neuromuscular blocking agents.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2005
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2007
CompletedJuly 23, 2007
July 1, 2007
July 19, 2005
July 20, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of the adequacy of sedation in patients receiving benzodiazepine plus opiate or this combination plus adjunctive ketamine
Comparison of the cost of sedation with both regimens
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Overall duration of mechanical ventilation
Need to administer neuromuscular blocking agents
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mechanically ventilated patients who receive adequate dosing of sedative agents (midazolam \> 0.15 mg/kg/h plus sufentanil \> 0.3 mcg/kg/h)
- Persistence of agitation indicating that sedation is not appropriate, as assessed by validated sedation scales (Harris scare; Motor Activity Assessment scale).
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Patient who already receives neuromuscular blocking agents
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Louis Mourier
Colombes, 92700, France
Related Publications (3)
Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002.
PMID: 10816184BACKGROUNDOstermann ME, Keenan SP, Seiferling RA, Sibbald WJ. Sedation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2000 Mar 15;283(11):1451-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.11.1451.
PMID: 10732935BACKGROUNDBourgoin A, Albanese J, Leone M, Sampol-Manos E, Viviand X, Martin C. Effects of sufentanil or ketamine administered in target-controlled infusion on the cerebral hemodynamics of severely brain-injured patients. Crit Care Med. 2005 May;33(5):1109-13. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000162491.26292.98.
PMID: 15891344BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Damien Ricard, MD
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2005
First Posted
July 22, 2005
Study Start
December 1, 2005
Study Completion
September 1, 2007
Last Updated
July 23, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-07