Study Stopped
lack of enrollment
Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intramuscular Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if intranasal ketamine is equally as effective and safe as intramuscular ketamine for procedural sedation in pediatric patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 2, 2017
CompletedJuly 2, 2017
June 1, 2017
1 year
July 21, 2010
March 16, 2017
June 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Onset of Sedation
Minutes it takes until the patient is cooperative enough for the procedure
Every 60 seconds through study completion
Study Arms (2)
Intranasal Ketamine
EXPERIMENTALIntramuscular Ketamine
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pediatric patients age 2 to 17 years old
- have a laceration of 4 cm on the face or 7 cm on the remainder of the body
- Require procedural sedation to repair the laceration
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with abnormal nasal physiology which would not allow for adequate medication delivery
- Unable to have a guardian present to consent on their behalf
- Allergy to ketamine
- Significant cardiac history (myocardial ischemia, heart failure, arrhythmias)
- Presenting with a head injury associated with possible intracranial hypertension
- Pregnancy
- Lacerations that require repair from a consult service
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Brett Faine
- Organization
- University of Iowa
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher Hogrefe, MD
University of Iowa
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brett Faine, Pharm.D.
University of Iowa
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Nugent, MD
University of Iowa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Pharmacy Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2010
First Posted
July 27, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 2, 2017
Results First Posted
July 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06