A Treatment Combination for Patients With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma
Phase III Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of Sorafenib in Repeated Cycles of 21 Days in Combination With Paclitaxel/Carboplatin Chemotherapy in Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma.
2 other identifiers
interventional
270
7 countries
66
Brief Summary
The objectives of this study are to compare the anti-tumor activity as measured by Progression Free Survival (PFS) and tolerability of Sorafenib in combination with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin versus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in combination with placebo in subjects with unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma who progressed after receiving only one prior therapy containing Dacarbazine (DTIC) or Temozolomide (TMZ).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2005
Typical duration for phase_3
66 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 23, 2011
CompletedOctober 31, 2014
October 1, 2014
1.3 years
May 16, 2005
January 27, 2011
October 23, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was calculated as the time (days) from date of randomization to date of first observed DP (per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] or clinical judgment, whichever was earlier: CR, PR, stable disease, progressive disease) or death due to any cause, if death occurred before progression was documented. The actual date of tumor assessments was used for this calculation. PFS for subjects without progression or death was censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. PFS for subjects who had no tumor assessments after baseline and did not die was censored at 1 day.
Time from randomization to documented tumor progression or death (median time of 124 days)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time from randomization to death (median time of 294 days)
Time to Progression (TTP)
Time from randomization to documented tumor progression (median time of 126 days)
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time from initial response to documented tumor progression or death (median time of 197 days)
Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Noted
baseline and at visit when best response was noted (maximum treatment duration of 68.3 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)
EXPERIMENTALSorafenib, 400 mg orally, 2 tablets (200 mg each) bid (bis in die \[twice daily\]) on Study Days 2 to 19 + Paclitaxel (225 mg/m\^2 iv \[Intravenous\]) and Carboplatin (AUC \[area under the curve\] 6 iv) on Study Day 1 (21 days per cycle) for double-blind (DB) treatment. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) entered active follow up period. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with disease progression (DP) entered long term follow up period.
Carboplatin/Paclitaxel (C/P)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlacebo, 2 tablets bid on Study Days 2-19 + Paclitaxel (225 mg/m\^2 iv) and Carboplatin (AUC 6 iv) on Study Day 1 (21 days per cycle) for double-blind (DB) treatment. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) entered active follow up period. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with disease progression (DP) entered long term follow up period.
Interventions
Sorafenib, 400 mg po (per os), 2 tablets (200 mg each) bid Study Days 2-19
Paclitaxel (225 mg/m\^2 iv) and Carboplatin (AUC 6 iv) on Study Day 1
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
- Subjects with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable (Stage III) or metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma
- Subjects must have progressed after receiving at least one cycle of DTIC or TMZ containing regimen
- Subjects who have an ECOG PS of 0 or 1
- Measurable disease defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately and serially measured per the modified RECIST criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Primary ocular or mucosal melanoma
- Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study except cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors (Ta \[Noninvasive papillary carcinoma\], Tis \[Carcinoma in situ: "flat tumor"\]\& T1 \[Tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue\]) or any cancer curatively treated \< 5 years prior to study entry
- History of cardiac disease
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (66)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, 35243, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, 90025, United States
Unknown Facility
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Unknown Facility
Park Ridge, Illinois, 60068, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Unknown Facility
Montclair, New Jersey, 07042, United States
Unknown Facility
Buffalo, New York, 14263, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, 10065, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, 43221, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6307, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
Unknown Facility
Seattle, Washington, 98109-1023, United States
Unknown Facility
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050, Australia
Unknown Facility
Warartah, New South Wales, 2300, Australia
Unknown Facility
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
Unknown Facility
Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia
Unknown Facility
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia
Unknown Facility
Malvern, Victoria, 3144, Australia
Unknown Facility
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
Unknown Facility
Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2, Canada
Unknown Facility
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada
Unknown Facility
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada
Unknown Facility
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Unknown Facility
Boulogne-Billancourt, 92104, France
Unknown Facility
Brest, 29285, France
Unknown Facility
Lyon, 39373, France
Unknown Facility
Montpellier, 34298, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, 75010, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, 75634, France
Unknown Facility
Villejuif, 94805, France
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69112, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68135, Germany
Unknown Facility
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076, Germany
Unknown Facility
München, Bavaria, 81675, Germany
Unknown Facility
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60488, Germany
Unknown Facility
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590, Germany
Unknown Facility
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122, Germany
Unknown Facility
Trier, Rhineland-Palatinate, 54290, Germany
Unknown Facility
Homburg, Saarland, 66421, Germany
Unknown Facility
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105, Germany
Unknown Facility
Berlin, State of Berlin, 12200, Germany
Unknown Facility
Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Rotterdam, 3075 EA, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 5WW, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, London, SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Manchester, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Bebington, Merseyside, CH63 4JY, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Swansea, SA2 8QA, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Hauschild A, Agarwala SS, Trefzer U, Hogg D, Robert C, Hersey P, Eggermont A, Grabbe S, Gonzalez R, Gille J, Peschel C, Schadendorf D, Garbe C, O'Day S, Daud A, White JM, Xia C, Patel K, Kirkwood JM, Keilholz U. Results of a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 10;27(17):2823-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7636. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
PMID: 19349552RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Metastatic melanoma is notorious for its resistance to chemotherapy. Thus, it is unlikely that inhibition of a single factor or pathway would produce a sustained clinical effect in patients with previously treated, highly refractory disease.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- BAYER
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bayer Study Director
Bayer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2005
First Posted
May 17, 2005
Study Start
May 1, 2005
Primary Completion
September 1, 2006
Study Completion
January 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 31, 2014
Results First Posted
February 23, 2011
Record last verified: 2014-10