NCT00097786

Brief Summary

This study is a test of the safety and effectiveness of two drugs, one for diabetes and one for hypertension, in keeping patients with high lab values of glucose from progressing to frank diabetes and developing cardiovascular complications. People in this study cannot have frank diabetes but are considered "borderline" based on blood tests. People in the study take none, one or both of the drugs and do not know which one(s) they are taking.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
9,306

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2002

Longer than P75 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Geographic Reach
37 countries

37 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2002

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2004

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 1, 2004

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2009

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 24, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7.8 years

First QC Date

November 30, 2004

Results QC Date

January 14, 2011

Last Update Submit

October 25, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

PreventionDiabetes type 2valsartannateglinide

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

    Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.

    Mean patient duration of 4.2 years

  • Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

    The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.

    Mean patient duration of 5.6 years

  • Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

    The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

    Mean patient duration of 5.8 years

  • Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

    Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.

    Mean patient duration of 4.2 years

  • Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

    The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.

    Mean patient duration of 5.6 years

  • Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

    The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

    Mean patient duration of 5.8 years

Study Arms (4)

Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took the combination of nateglinide 30 mg (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals) and valsartan 80 mg (once daily \[od\] in the morning). After 2 weeks, patients were up-titrated to nateglinide 60 mg ac and valsartan 160 mg od.

Drug: Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg

Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo

EXPERIMENTAL

For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took valsartan 80 mg capsules (once daily \[od\] in the morning). After 2 weeks, patients were up-titrated to 160 mg valsartan od. Patients also received nateglinide placebo tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals).

Drug: Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo

Nateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo

EXPERIMENTAL

For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took nateglinide 30 mg tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals). After 2 weeks, patients were uptitrated to 60 mg nateglinide ac. Patients also received valsartan placebo capsules (once daily \[od\] in the morning).

Drug: Nateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patients took 3 nateglinide placebo tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals) and 1 valsartan placebo capsule (once daily \[od\] in the morning).

Drug: Valsartan placebo + nateglinide placebo

Interventions

The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg

The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo

The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

Nateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo

The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults
  • Impaired glucose tolerance
  • Age dependent risk factors

You may not qualify if:

  • Frank diabetes
  • For detailed information, call contact person.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (38)

Unknown Facility

Multiple Locations, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Multiple Locations, Austria

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Brazil

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Chile

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, China

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Colombia

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Ecuador

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Guatemala

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Hong Kong

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Norway

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Peru

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Singapore

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Switzerland

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Investigative Site, Uruguay

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Harumi Higuchi Dos Santos M, Sharma A, Sun JL, Pieper K, McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Lopes RD. International Variation in Outcomes Among People with Cardiovascular Disease or Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: Insights from the NAVIGATOR Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jan 13;6(1):e003892. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003892.

  • Preiss D, Thomas LE, Wojdyla DM, Haffner SM, Gill JM, Yates T, Davies MJ, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Califf RM, Kraus WE; NAVIGATOR Investigators. Prospective relationships between body weight and physical activity: an observational analysis from the NAVIGATOR study. BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 14;5(8):e007901. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007901.

  • Katz M, Califf RM, Sun JL, McMurray JJ, Thomas L, Lopes RD. Venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular risk: results from the NAVIGATOR trial. Am J Med. 2015 Mar;128(3):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

  • Preiss D, Haffner SM, Thomas LE, Sun JL, Sattar N, Yates T, J Davies M, McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Califf RM, Kraus WE. Change in levels of physical activity after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: an observational analysis from the NAVIGATOR study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Dec;16(12):1265-8. doi: 10.1111/dom.12320. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

  • Huffman KM, Sun JL, Thomas L, Bales CW, Califf RM, Yates T, Davies MJ, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Tuomilehto J, Haffner SM, Kraus WE. Impact of baseline physical activity and diet behavior on metabolic syndrome in a pharmaceutical trial: results from NAVIGATOR. Metabolism. 2014 Apr;63(4):554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

  • Yates T, Haffner SM, Schulte PJ, Thomas L, Huffman KM, Bales CW, Califf RM, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Tuomilehto J, Davies MJ, Kraus WE. Association between change in daily ambulatory activity and cardiovascular events in people with impaired glucose tolerance (NAVIGATOR trial): a cohort analysis. Lancet. 2014 Mar 22;383(9922):1059-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62061-9. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

  • Shen L, Shah BR, Reyes EM, Thomas L, Wojdyla D, Diem P, Leiter LA, Charbonnel B, Mareev V, Horton ES, Haffner SM, Soska V, Holman R, Bethel MA, Schaper F, Sun JL, McMurray JJ, Califf RM, Krum H. Role of diuretics, beta blockers, and statins in increasing the risk of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: reanalysis of data from the NAVIGATOR study. BMJ. 2013 Dec 9;347:f6745. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6745.

  • NAVIGATOR Study Group; McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, Belenkov Y, Boolell M, Buse JB, Buckley BM, Chacra AR, Chiang FT, Charbonnel B, Chow CC, Davies MJ, Deedwania P, Diem P, Einhorn D, Fonseca V, Fulcher GR, Gaciong Z, Gaztambide S, Giles T, Horton E, Ilkova H, Jenssen T, Kahn SE, Krum H, Laakso M, Leiter LA, Levitt NS, Mareev V, Martinez F, Masson C, Mazzone T, Meaney E, Nesto R, Pan C, Prager R, Raptis SA, Rutten GE, Sandstroem H, Schaper F, Scheen A, Schmitz O, Sinay I, Soska V, Stender S, Tamas G, Tognoni G, Tuomilehto J, Villamil AS, Vozar J, Califf RM. Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1477-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001121. Epub 2010 Mar 14.

  • NAVIGATOR Study Group; Holman RR, Haffner SM, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, Belenkov Y, Boolell M, Buse JB, Buckley BM, Chacra AR, Chiang FT, Charbonnel B, Chow CC, Davies MJ, Deedwania P, Diem P, Einhorn D, Fonseca V, Fulcher GR, Gaciong Z, Gaztambide S, Giles T, Horton E, Ilkova H, Jenssen T, Kahn SE, Krum H, Laakso M, Leiter LA, Levitt NS, Mareev V, Martinez F, Masson C, Mazzone T, Meaney E, Nesto R, Pan C, Prager R, Raptis SA, Rutten GE, Sandstroem H, Schaper F, Scheen A, Schmitz O, Sinay I, Soska V, Stender S, Tamas G, Tognoni G, Tuomilehto J, Villamil AS, Vozar J, Califf RM. Effect of nateglinide on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1463-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001122. Epub 2010 Mar 14.

  • Krum H, McMurray JJ, Horton E, Gerlock T, Holzhauer B, Zuurman L, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, Holman RR, Califf RM. Baseline characteristics of the Nateglinide and Valsartan Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) trial population: comparison with other diabetes prevention trials. Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Apr;28(2):124-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00146.x. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

  • Bethel MA, Deedwania P, Levitt NS, Schmitz O, Huntsman-Labed A, Califf RM, Haffner SM, Diem P; NAVIGATOR Study Group. Metabolic syndrome and alanine aminotransferase: a global perspective from the NAVIGATOR screening population. Diabet Med. 2009 Dec;26(12):1204-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02864.x.

  • Bethel MA, Holman R, Haffner SM, Califf RM, Huntsman-Labed A, Hua TA, McMurray J. Determining the most appropriate components for a composite clinical trial outcome. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.018. Epub 2008 Jul 31.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Interventions

ValsartanNateglinide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TetrazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsValineAmino Acids, Branched-ChainAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsAmino Acids, EssentialCyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPhenylalanineAmino Acids, AromaticAmino Acids, Cyclic

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Director
Organization
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study Officials

  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2004

First Posted

December 1, 2004

Study Start

January 1, 2002

Primary Completion

October 1, 2009

Study Completion

October 1, 2009

Last Updated

November 8, 2023

Results First Posted

May 24, 2011

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations