Long-term Study of Nateglinide+Valsartan to Prevent or Delay Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Complications
Navigator
A Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Forced-titration, 2 x 2 Factorial Design Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of Nateglinide and Valsartan in the Prevention of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Subjects With Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)
1 other identifier
interventional
9,306
37 countries
37
Brief Summary
This study is a test of the safety and effectiveness of two drugs, one for diabetes and one for hypertension, in keeping patients with high lab values of glucose from progressing to frank diabetes and developing cardiovascular complications. People in this study cannot have frank diabetes but are considered "borderline" based on blood tests. People in the study take none, one or both of the drugs and do not know which one(s) they are taking.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Jan 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
37 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 24, 2011
CompletedNovember 8, 2023
October 1, 2023
7.8 years
November 30, 2004
January 14, 2011
October 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan
Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.
Mean patient duration of 4.2 years
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan
The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.
Mean patient duration of 5.6 years
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan
The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.
Mean patient duration of 5.8 years
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide
Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.
Mean patient duration of 4.2 years
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide
The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.
Mean patient duration of 5.6 years
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide
The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.
Mean patient duration of 5.8 years
Study Arms (4)
Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg
EXPERIMENTALFor the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took the combination of nateglinide 30 mg (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals) and valsartan 80 mg (once daily \[od\] in the morning). After 2 weeks, patients were up-titrated to nateglinide 60 mg ac and valsartan 160 mg od.
Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo
EXPERIMENTALFor the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took valsartan 80 mg capsules (once daily \[od\] in the morning). After 2 weeks, patients were up-titrated to 160 mg valsartan od. Patients also received nateglinide placebo tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals).
Nateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo
EXPERIMENTALFor the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took nateglinide 30 mg tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals). After 2 weeks, patients were uptitrated to 60 mg nateglinide ac. Patients also received valsartan placebo capsules (once daily \[od\] in the morning).
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients took 3 nateglinide placebo tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals) and 1 valsartan placebo capsule (once daily \[od\] in the morning).
Interventions
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults
- Impaired glucose tolerance
- Age dependent risk factors
You may not qualify if:
- Frank diabetes
- For detailed information, call contact person.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (38)
Unknown Facility
Multiple Locations, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Australia
Unknown Facility
Multiple Locations, Austria
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Canada
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Chile
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, China
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Ecuador
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Finland
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, France
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Germany
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Greece
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Guatemala
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Hong Kong
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Italy
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Norway
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Peru
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Poland
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Russia
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Singapore
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Spain
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Switzerland
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Investigative Site, Uruguay
Related Publications (12)
Harumi Higuchi Dos Santos M, Sharma A, Sun JL, Pieper K, McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Lopes RD. International Variation in Outcomes Among People with Cardiovascular Disease or Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: Insights from the NAVIGATOR Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jan 13;6(1):e003892. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003892.
PMID: 28087508DERIVEDPreiss D, Thomas LE, Wojdyla DM, Haffner SM, Gill JM, Yates T, Davies MJ, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Califf RM, Kraus WE; NAVIGATOR Investigators. Prospective relationships between body weight and physical activity: an observational analysis from the NAVIGATOR study. BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 14;5(8):e007901. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007901.
PMID: 26275900DERIVEDKatz M, Califf RM, Sun JL, McMurray JJ, Thomas L, Lopes RD. Venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular risk: results from the NAVIGATOR trial. Am J Med. 2015 Mar;128(3):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
PMID: 25447626DERIVEDPreiss D, Haffner SM, Thomas LE, Sun JL, Sattar N, Yates T, J Davies M, McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Califf RM, Kraus WE. Change in levels of physical activity after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: an observational analysis from the NAVIGATOR study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Dec;16(12):1265-8. doi: 10.1111/dom.12320. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
PMID: 24861892DERIVEDHuffman KM, Sun JL, Thomas L, Bales CW, Califf RM, Yates T, Davies MJ, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Tuomilehto J, Haffner SM, Kraus WE. Impact of baseline physical activity and diet behavior on metabolic syndrome in a pharmaceutical trial: results from NAVIGATOR. Metabolism. 2014 Apr;63(4):554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
PMID: 24559843DERIVEDYates T, Haffner SM, Schulte PJ, Thomas L, Huffman KM, Bales CW, Califf RM, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Tuomilehto J, Davies MJ, Kraus WE. Association between change in daily ambulatory activity and cardiovascular events in people with impaired glucose tolerance (NAVIGATOR trial): a cohort analysis. Lancet. 2014 Mar 22;383(9922):1059-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62061-9. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
PMID: 24361242DERIVEDShen L, Shah BR, Reyes EM, Thomas L, Wojdyla D, Diem P, Leiter LA, Charbonnel B, Mareev V, Horton ES, Haffner SM, Soska V, Holman R, Bethel MA, Schaper F, Sun JL, McMurray JJ, Califf RM, Krum H. Role of diuretics, beta blockers, and statins in increasing the risk of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: reanalysis of data from the NAVIGATOR study. BMJ. 2013 Dec 9;347:f6745. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6745.
PMID: 24322398DERIVEDNAVIGATOR Study Group; McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, Belenkov Y, Boolell M, Buse JB, Buckley BM, Chacra AR, Chiang FT, Charbonnel B, Chow CC, Davies MJ, Deedwania P, Diem P, Einhorn D, Fonseca V, Fulcher GR, Gaciong Z, Gaztambide S, Giles T, Horton E, Ilkova H, Jenssen T, Kahn SE, Krum H, Laakso M, Leiter LA, Levitt NS, Mareev V, Martinez F, Masson C, Mazzone T, Meaney E, Nesto R, Pan C, Prager R, Raptis SA, Rutten GE, Sandstroem H, Schaper F, Scheen A, Schmitz O, Sinay I, Soska V, Stender S, Tamas G, Tognoni G, Tuomilehto J, Villamil AS, Vozar J, Califf RM. Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1477-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001121. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
PMID: 20228403DERIVEDNAVIGATOR Study Group; Holman RR, Haffner SM, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, Belenkov Y, Boolell M, Buse JB, Buckley BM, Chacra AR, Chiang FT, Charbonnel B, Chow CC, Davies MJ, Deedwania P, Diem P, Einhorn D, Fonseca V, Fulcher GR, Gaciong Z, Gaztambide S, Giles T, Horton E, Ilkova H, Jenssen T, Kahn SE, Krum H, Laakso M, Leiter LA, Levitt NS, Mareev V, Martinez F, Masson C, Mazzone T, Meaney E, Nesto R, Pan C, Prager R, Raptis SA, Rutten GE, Sandstroem H, Schaper F, Scheen A, Schmitz O, Sinay I, Soska V, Stender S, Tamas G, Tognoni G, Tuomilehto J, Villamil AS, Vozar J, Califf RM. Effect of nateglinide on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1463-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001122. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
PMID: 20228402DERIVEDKrum H, McMurray JJ, Horton E, Gerlock T, Holzhauer B, Zuurman L, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, Holman RR, Califf RM. Baseline characteristics of the Nateglinide and Valsartan Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) trial population: comparison with other diabetes prevention trials. Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Apr;28(2):124-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00146.x. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
PMID: 20184589DERIVEDBethel MA, Deedwania P, Levitt NS, Schmitz O, Huntsman-Labed A, Califf RM, Haffner SM, Diem P; NAVIGATOR Study Group. Metabolic syndrome and alanine aminotransferase: a global perspective from the NAVIGATOR screening population. Diabet Med. 2009 Dec;26(12):1204-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02864.x.
PMID: 20002471DERIVEDBethel MA, Holman R, Haffner SM, Califf RM, Huntsman-Labed A, Hua TA, McMurray J. Determining the most appropriate components for a composite clinical trial outcome. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.018. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
PMID: 18926145DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2004
First Posted
December 1, 2004
Study Start
January 1, 2002
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
November 8, 2023
Results First Posted
May 24, 2011
Record last verified: 2023-10