A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Adults With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
OLYMPUS
A Phase II/III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Adults With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
1 other identifier
interventional
439
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This is a Phase II/III, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rituximab in adults with PPMS. The study will enroll approximately 435 subjects at up to 60 sites in the United States and Canada.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 multiple-sclerosis
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 9, 2015
CompletedSeptember 9, 2015
August 1, 2015
3.3 years
July 9, 2004
August 10, 2015
August 10, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time to Confirmed Disease Progression (CDP)
Disease progression was assessed using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), a disability scale that ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent increased disability. Progression was defined as either an increase of greater than or equal to (≥) 1 point from a Baseline EDSS score within 2.0 to 5.5 points, or an increase of ≥0.5 points from a Baseline EDSS score greater than (\>) 5.5 points, for which the change was not attributable to another etiology. Repeat assessment to determine CDP must have occurred at a regularly scheduled visit at least 12 weeks after initial progression; those who discontinued treatment early without confirmatory EDSS assessment were considered as having CDP. Those who did not meet criteria for CDP, completed treatment with only initial progression, or received an exclusionary therapy were censored at last EDSS assessment. Time to CDP was the time from randomization to initial disease progression, estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis.
96 weeks (from Screening to Week 96, and at least 12 weeks after initial progression)
Percentage of Participants With CDP
Disease progression was assessed using the EDSS, a disability scale that ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent increased disability. Progression was defined as either an increase of ≥1 point from a Baseline EDSS score within 2.0 to 5.5 points, or an increase of ≥0.5 points from a Baseline EDSS score \>5.5 points, for which the change was not attributable to another etiology. Repeat assessment to determine CDP must have occurred at a regularly scheduled visit at least 12 weeks after initial progression; those who discontinued treatment early without confirmatory EDSS assessment were considered as having CDP. The percentage of participants with CDP was calculated as \[number of participants meeting the above criteria divided by the number analyzed\] multiplied by 100.
96 weeks (from Screening to Week 96, and at least 12 weeks after initial progression)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Total Volume of Transverse Relaxation Time (T2) Brain Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan
At Baseline and Week 96
Change From Baseline to Week 96 in Brain Volume on MRI Scan
At Baseline and Week 96
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTAL2
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Definitive diagnosis of PPMS
- Disease duration of ≥ 1 year
- EDSS at baseline between 2.0 and 6.5 points, inclusive
- Score of ≥ 2.0 on the Functional Systems (FS) scale for the pyramidal system or gait that is due to lower extremity findings
- Presence of at least one of the following in a CSF specimen obtained during the screening period and analyzed by the central laboratory or results from a CSF sample obtained during the previous 24 months:
- For subjects of reproductive potential (males and females), use of a reliable means of contraception (e.g., hormonal contraceptive, patch, vaginal ring, intrauterine device, physical barrier) during study treatment and for 1 year following the last dose of study drug
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Incompatibility with MRI
- Lack of peripheral venous access
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
- Known active bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial, or other infection (including atypical mycobacterial disease, but excluding fungal infections of nail beds or recurrent herpes zoster or simplex infections) or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with IV antibiotics within 30 days prior to screening or oral antibiotics within 14 days prior to screening
- History or presence of recurrent or chronic infection (e.g., hepatitis B or C, HIV, syphilis)
- History of cancer, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies (except resected and fully resolved cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas)
- History of alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to screening
- History of or currently active primary or secondary immunodeficiency
- Significant cardiac or pulmonary disease (including obstructive pulmonary disease)
- Presence of other significant, uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrine, or gastrointestinal disease that might interfere with a subject's ability to participate and to complete approximately 2.5 years of study participation
- History or presence of MS relapse or exacerbation
- History or presence of vascular disease potentially affecting the brain or spinal cord (e.g., stroke, transient ischemic attack, carotid stenosis, aortic aneurysm, intracranial aneurysm, hemorrhage, arteriovenous malformation)
- History or presence of myelopathy due to spinal cord compression by disk or vertebral disease
- History of severe, clinically significant central nervous system trauma (e.g., cerebral contusion, spinal cord compression)
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Genentech, Inc.lead
Related Publications (4)
Kappos L, Yiu S, Dahlke F, Coetzee T, Cutter GR, Yuen S, Bonati U, Lublin FD. Composite Confirmed Disability Worsening/Progression Is a Useful Clinical Endpoint for Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials. Neurology. 2025 May 27;104(10):e213558. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213558. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
PMID: 40258203DERIVEDFalet JR, Durso-Finley J, Nichyporuk B, Schroeter J, Bovis F, Sormani MP, Precup D, Arbel T, Arnold DL. Estimating individual treatment effect on disability progression in multiple sclerosis using deep learning. Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 26;13(1):5645. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33269-x.
PMID: 36163349DERIVEDZhang J, Waubant E, Cutter G, Wolinsky JS, Glanzman R. EDSS variability before randomization may limit treatment discovery in primary progressive MS. Mult Scler. 2013 May;19(6):775-81. doi: 10.1177/1352458512459685. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
PMID: 23027880DERIVEDHawker K, O'Connor P, Freedman MS, Calabresi PA, Antel J, Simon J, Hauser S, Waubant E, Vollmer T, Panitch H, Zhang J, Chin P, Smith CH; OLYMPUS trial group. Rituximab in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Ann Neurol. 2009 Oct;66(4):460-71. doi: 10.1002/ana.21867.
PMID: 19847908DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Communications
- Organization
- Hoffmann-LaRoche
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Craig Smith, M.D.
Genentech, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2004
First Posted
July 13, 2004
Study Start
June 1, 2004
Primary Completion
October 1, 2007
Last Updated
September 9, 2015
Results First Posted
September 9, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08