PREVAIL: PREvention of VTE After Acute Ischemic Stroke With LMWH Enoxaparin ( - VTE: Venous Thromboembolism - LMWH: Low Molecular Weight Heparin)
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Following Acute Ischemic Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
14 countries
14
Brief Summary
Primary objective:
- To demonstrate superiority of enoxaparin 40 mg sc qd in the prevention of VTE compared to UFH (unfractionated heparin) 5000 U sc q12 hours given for 10 ± 4 days following acute ischemic stroke. Secondary objectives:
- To compare the incidence of VTE between the 2 treatment groups at 30, 60, and 90 days from the time of randomization
- To compare neurologic outcomes between the 2 treatment groups, including incidence of stroke recurrence, rate of stroke progression, and patient functional status, during the 10 ± 4 days of treatment, and after 30, 60, and 90 days from the time of randomization
- To evaluate the safety of using enoxaparin compared to UFH for VTE prevention in patients following acute ischemic stroke
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2006
CompletedJanuary 11, 2011
January 1, 2011
2.9 years
February 12, 2004
January 10, 2011
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cumulative occurrence of VTE events (deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism)
10 ± 4 days following acute ischemic stroke
Secondary Outcomes (5)
cumulative VTE events
at 30-day, 60-day and 90-day
stroke recurrence, stroke progression, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores
during treatment and follow-up periods
Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) scores
at 30-day and 90-day follow-up
major & minor hemorrhages
from the inform consent signed up to the end of the study
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE), serious adverse events (SAE), all-cause mortality
from the inform consent signed up to the end of the study
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Acute ischemic stroke, any territory, with an appropriate neuroradiologic study (head CT scan or brain MRI scan) providing results consistent with non hemorrhagic stroke
- Onset of symptoms of qualifying stroke within 48 hours prior to randomization. In patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for the acute stroke, such as tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), administration of study drug may not start until at least 24 hours after completion of thrombolytic therapy
- Significant motor impairment of the leg, as indicated by a NIHSS score ≥2 on item 6
- Inability to walk without assistance
You may not qualify if:
- Females who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or of childbearing potential and not using medically acceptable and effective contraception
- Clinical evidence of VTE at screening
- Any evidence of active bleeding on the basis of clinical judgment
- Prior history of intracranial hemorrhage (including that at screening)
- Spinal or epidural analgesia or lumbar puncture within the preceding 24 hours
- Thrombolytic therapy (e.g., tPA) or intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy within the preceding 24 hours.Thrombolytic therapy is permitted for treatment of the acute stroke but must have been completed 24 hours prior to randomization.
- Comatose at screening (NIHSS score ≥2 on item 1a)
- Known or suspected cerebral aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation
- Confirmed malignancy that may pose an increased risk for bleeding or otherwise compromise follow-up or outcome assessment (e.g., lung cancer)
- Impaired hemostasis, i.e., known or suspected coagulopathy (acquired or inherited); baseline platelet count \<100,000/mm3; aPTT 1.5 X the laboratory upper limit of normal; or international normalized ratio(INR) \>1.5
- Major surgery or recent major trauma within the previous 3 months
- Anticipated need for full-dose treatment with therapeutic levels of an anticoagulant (LMWH, UFH, oral anticoagulant), e.g., for cardiogenic source of embolism or dissection
- Treatment with a LMWH or UFH at prophylactic dose for more than 48 hours prior to randomization(patients receiving LMWH or UFH less than 48 hours prior to randomization may be randomized)
- Allergy to heparin or enoxaparin sodium, or known hypersensitivity to heparin, enoxaparin, or pork products
- History of heparin or enoxaparin induced thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia \[HIT\], heparin-associated thrombocytopenia \[HAT\], or heparin-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome \[HITTS\])
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sanofilead
Study Sites (15)
Sanofi-Aventis
Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States
Sanofi-Aventis
North Ryde, Australia
Sanofi-Aventis
Vienna, Austria
Sanofi-Aventis
São Paulo, Brazil
Sanofi-Aventis
Laval, Canada
Sanofi-Aventis
Bogotá, Colombia
Sanofi-Aventis
Prague, Czechia
Sanofi-Aventis
Mumbai, India
Sanofi-Aventis
Netanya, Israel
Sanofi-Aventis
Milan, Italy
Sanofi-Aventis
México, Mexico
Sanofi-Aventis
Warsaw, Poland
Sanofi-Aventis
Johannesburg, South Africa
Sanofi-Aventis
Seoul, South Korea
Sanofi-Aventis
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Kase CS, Albers GW, Bladin C, Fieschi C, Gabbai AA, O'Riordan W, Pineo GF; PREVAIL Investigators. Neurological outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke receiving enoxaparin or heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: subanalysis of the Prevention of VTE after Acute Ischemic Stroke with LMWH (PREVAIL) study. Stroke. 2009 Nov;40(11):3532-40. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555003. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
PMID: 19696423RESULTSherman DG, Albers GW, Bladin C, Fieschi C, Gabbai AA, Kase CS, O'Riordan W, Pineo GF; PREVAIL Investigators. The efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after acute ischaemic stroke (PREVAIL Study): an open-label randomised comparison. Lancet. 2007 Apr 21;369(9570):1347-1355. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60633-3.
PMID: 17448820RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Luc Sagnard
Sanofi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2004
First Posted
February 16, 2004
Study Start
August 1, 2003
Primary Completion
July 1, 2006
Last Updated
January 11, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-01