Radiation Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Reducing Mouth Dryness in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Cancer
A Phase II Study Of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) +/- Chemotherapy For Nasopharyngeal Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
68
1 country
17
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Giving radiation therapy in different ways may cause less damage to normal tissue, prevent or lessen mouth dryness, and may help patients live more comfortably. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of specialized radiation therapy techniques with or without chemotherapy in reducing mouth dryness in patients who have nasopharyngeal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 head-and-neck-cancer
Started Feb 2003
Longer than P75 for phase_2 head-and-neck-cancer
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2003
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 13, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedFebruary 17, 2017
December 1, 2016
4 years
April 7, 2003
October 8, 2014
December 30, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Protocol Compliance of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Treatment Delivered
Patients scored by the study chairs as no variation or minor variation were considered compliant, while patients scored as major variation or inevaluable were considered non-compliant. The number being reported is the number non-compliant. A compliance rate of 90% was targeted with 75% or lower being considered unacceptable. Fifty-seven patients were required with types I and II error rates both 0.10. If 10 or more patients out of 57 were non-compliant, the treatment would be unacceptable, per a two-stage Fleming multiple testing procedure.
From start of treatment to end of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Rate of Xerostomia at 1 Year (Grade ≥ 2)
From start of treatment to 1 year
Rate of Locoregional Control at 2 Years
From registration to 2 years
Whole Mouth Saliva Output Relative to Pretreatment Measurements
From start of treatment to 1 year
Other Acute and Late Toxicities
From start of treatment to last follow-up
Chemotherapy Compliance
From start of treatment to end of treatment
Study Arms (1)
IMRT +/- chemotherapy
EXPERIMENTALIntensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for all patients and chemotherapy (cisplatin and fluorouracil) for patients with stage ≥ T2b and/or N+
Interventions
100 mg/m\^2 intravenously on days 1, 22, and 43 and 80 mg/m\^2 intravenously on days 71, 99, and 127
1000 mg/m\^2/day as 96-hour continuous infusion on days 71-74, 99-102, and 127-130
The gross tumor and lymph node metastasis, Planning Target Volume (PTV) 70 (Clinical Target Volume \[CTV\] 70 with a 5 mm margin) will receive 70 Gy in 33 fractions at 2.12 Gy per fraction. Treatment will be delivered once daily, 5 fractions per week, over 6 weeks and 3 days.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Grouplead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (17)
Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
University of California Davis Cancer Center
Davis, California, 95616, United States
Radiological Associates of Sacramento Medical Group, Incorporated
Sacramento, California, 95815, United States
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Northeast Georgia Medical Center
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501, United States
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Monmouth Medical Center
Long Branch, New Jersey, 07740, United States
Albuquerque Regional Medical Center at Lovelace Sandia Health System
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102, United States
Akron City Hospital
Akron, Ohio, 44304, United States
Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Fox Chase-Temple Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2497, United States
CCOP - MainLine Health
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096, United States
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Wilford Hall Medical Center
Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, 78236, United States
McKay-Dee Hospital Center
Ogden, Utah, 84403, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Related Publications (3)
Chen A, Lee N, Yang C, Liu T, Narayan S, Vijayakumar S, Purdy J. Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy and segmental multileaf collimator-based techniques for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: dosimetric analysis incorporating quality assurance guidelines from RTOG 0225. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jun;9(3):291-8. doi: 10.1177/153303461000900308.
PMID: 20441239RESULTLee N, Harris J, Garden AS, Straube W, Glisson B, Xia P, Bosch W, Morrison WH, Quivey J, Thorstad W, Jones C, Ang KK. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group phase II trial 0225. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 1;27(22):3684-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9109. Epub 2009 Jun 29.
PMID: 19564532RESULTLee NY, Harris J, Garden A, et al.: Phase II multi-institutional study of IMRT ± chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RTOG 0225): preliminary results. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69 (3 Suppl): A-23, S13-14, 2007.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Wendy Seiferheld
- Organization
- NRG Oncology
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nancy Lee, MD
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2003
First Posted
April 9, 2003
Study Start
February 1, 2003
Primary Completion
February 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 17, 2017
Results First Posted
October 13, 2014
Record last verified: 2016-12