Study Stopped
low accrual
Capecitabine Compared With Vinorelbine in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
A Randomized Phase II-III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Capecitabine and Vinorelbine in Anthracycline and Taxane Pre-Treated Metastatic Breast Cancer
4 other identifiers
interventional
47
5 countries
12
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known if capecitabine is more effective than vinorelbine in treating metastatic breast cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase II/III trial to compare the effectiveness of capecitabine with that of vinorelbine in treating women who have metastatic breast cancer that has been previously treated with chemotherapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 breast-cancer
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2002
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2004
CompletedJuly 18, 2012
July 1, 2012
2.3 years
November 12, 2002
July 17, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Ziekenhuis Network Antwerpen Middelheim
Antwerp, 2020, Belgium
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, 1000, Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Edegem, B-2650, Belgium
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Augustinus
Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium
Institut Bergonie
Bordeaux, 33076, France
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038, France
Klinikum Nuernberg - Klinikum Sued
Nurberg, 90471, Germany
Institute of Oncology - Ljubljana
Ljubljana, Sl-1000, Slovenia
Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
Sheffield, England, S1O 2SJ, United Kingdom
Western General Hospital
Edinburgh, Scotland, EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
Beatson Oncology Centre
Glasgow, Scotland, G11 6NT, United Kingdom
Western Infirmary
Glasgow, Scotland, G11 6NT, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Pajk B, Cufer T, Canney P, Ellis P, Cameron D, Blot E, Vermorken J, Coleman R, Marreaud S, Bogaerts J, Basaran G, Piccart M. Anti-tumor activity of capecitabine and vinorelbine in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: findings from the EORTC 10001 randomized phase II trial. Breast. 2008 Apr;17(2):180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
PMID: 17976988RESULTHoon SN, Lau PK, White AM, Bulsara MK, Banks PD, Redfern AD. Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 26;5(5):CD011220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011220.pub2.
PMID: 34037241DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Martine J. Piccart-Gebhart, MD, PhD
Jules Bordet Institute
- STUDY CHAIR
Chris Twelves, MD, BMedSci, FRCP
University of Glasgow
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2002
First Posted
January 27, 2003
Study Start
September 1, 2002
Primary Completion
December 1, 2004
Last Updated
July 18, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-07