Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
Phase II Study of Fixed-Dose Capecitabine in Metastatic Breast Cancer
5 other identifiers
interventional
26
1 country
3
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well capecitabine works in treating patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 breast-cancer
Started Apr 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_2 breast-cancer
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 21, 2012
CompletedJanuary 27, 2020
January 1, 2020
5.7 years
January 10, 2006
November 21, 2012
January 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Response Rate
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT/MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Participants were followed to progression, evaluated every 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Clinical Benefit as Assessed by Lack of Progression for at Least 24 Weeks
3-week cycles of treatment up to 16 cycles
Pharmacokinetics of Capecitabine and Metabolites as Assessed by Maximum Plasma Concentration
0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 hours
Pharmacokinetics of Capecitabine and Metabolites as Assessed by Area Under the Curve (AUC)
0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 hours
Adherence and Compliance to Oral Medication Using Electronic Monitoring
3-week cycles of treatment up to 16 cycles
Time to Treatment Failure
3-week cycles of treatment up to 16 cycles
Study Arms (1)
Capecitabine
EXPERIMENTAL26 patients received the pre-defined starting dose of capecitabine of 3,000 mg orally daily given in two divided doses. Two thirds of the patients received either the same dose or a 500 mg lower dose compared to what would have been administered with a commonly used body surface area (BSA)-dosing schedule (2,000 mg/m2 with rounding down to nearest 500 mg multiple).
Interventions
A total of 115 cycles of therapy were administered and five patients did not complete cycle 1. The median number of cycles initiated was four (range 1-16).
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
DeCesaris Cancer Institute at Anne Arundel Medical Center
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401, United States
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-2410, United States
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center at Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Related Publications (1)
Fackler MJ, Lopez Bujanda Z, Umbricht C, Teo WW, Cho S, Zhang Z, Visvanathan K, Jeter S, Argani P, Wang C, Lyman JP, de Brot M, Ingle JN, Boughey J, McGuire K, King TA, Carey LA, Cope L, Wolff AC, Sukumar S. Novel methylated biomarkers and a robust assay to detect circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2014 Apr 15;74(8):2160-70. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3392.
PMID: 24737128DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The small sample size limited a number of the secondary objectives.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Antonio Wolff
- Organization
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antonio C. Wolff, MD
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2006
First Posted
January 11, 2006
Study Start
April 1, 2004
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
November 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 27, 2020
Results First Posted
December 21, 2012
Record last verified: 2020-01