Combination Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Cancer of the Esophagus
A PHASE III INTERGROUP RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS: HIGH-DOSE VS CONVENTIONAL-DOSE RADIATION THERAPY
5 other identifiers
interventional
298
2 countries
18
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not known whether high-dose radiation therapy is more effective than standard dose radiation therapy in treating cancer of the esophagus. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy plus high- or standard-dose radiation therapy in treating patients with cancer of the esophagus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 1995
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2004
CompletedNovember 19, 2013
November 1, 2013
4.3 years
November 1, 1999
November 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Grouplead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Groupcollaborator
- North Central Cancer Treatment Groupcollaborator
Study Sites (18)
CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5404, United States
CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association
Peoria, Illinois, 61602, United States
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801, United States
CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403-1206, United States
CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, 10309-1016, United States
Siouxland Hematology-Oncology
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101-1733, United States
CCOP - Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67214-3882, United States
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805, United States
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
CentraCare Clinic
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303, United States
Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501, United States
CCOP - Merit Care Hospital
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122, United States
Altru Health Systems
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58201, United States
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, 43623-3456, United States
CCOP - Geisinger Clinical and Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-2001, United States
Rapid City Regional Hospital
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57709, United States
CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105-1080, United States
Saskatchewan Cancer Agency
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 6X3, Canada
Related Publications (6)
Thomas CR Jr, Berkey BA, Minsky BD, Gaspar LE, Herskovic A, Rich TA, Gunderson LL. Recursive partitioning analysis of pretreatment variables of 416 patients with locoregional esophageal cancer treated with definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy on Intergroup and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Apr 1;58(5):1405-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.022.
PMID: 15050316BACKGROUNDSmalley SR, Gunderson L, Tepper J, Martenson JA Jr, Minsky B, Willett C, Rich T. Gastric surgical adjuvant radiotherapy consensus report: rationale and treatment implementation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Feb 1;52(2):283-93. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02646-3.
PMID: 11872272BACKGROUNDKachnic LA, Winter K, Wasserman T, Kelsen D, Ginsberg R, Pisansky TM, Martenson J, Komaki R, Okawara G, Rosenthal SA, Willett CG, Minsky BD. Longitudinal Quality-of-Life Analysis of RTOG 94-05 (Int 0123):A Phase III Trial of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2011 Mar;4(2):45-52.
PMID: 21673875RESULTMinsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, Pisansky TM, Martenson J, Komaki R, Okawara G, Rosenthal SA, Kelsen DP. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 1;20(5):1167-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1167.
PMID: 11870157RESULTKachnic LA, Scott C, Ginsberg R, et al.: One year follow-up reveals no difference in quality of life between high dose and conventional dose radiation: a quality of life assessment of RTOG 94-05. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51 (3 suppl 1): A-172, 97, 2001.
RESULTMinsky BD, Berkey B, Kelsen DK, et al.: Preliminary results of Intergroup INT 0123 randomized trial of combined modality therapy (CMT) for esophagel cancer: standard vs high dose radiation therapy. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 19: A927, 2000.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Bruce D. Minsky, MD
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- STUDY CHAIR
Thomas M. Pisansky, MD
Mayo Clinic
- STUDY CHAIR
James A. Martenson, MD
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 1999
First Posted
August 31, 2004
Study Start
June 1, 1995
Primary Completion
September 1, 1999
Last Updated
November 19, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11