NCT07554651

Brief Summary

This prospective multicenter single-arm study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of a novel volumetric cross-shaped vaginal pessary in women with pelvic organ prolapse who had prior experience using a traditional vaginal pessary. Each participant serves as her own control by comparing outcomes after fitting of the cross-shaped pessary with documented baseline outcomes during prior traditional pessary use.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2025

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 21, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 21, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

vaginal pessarypelvic floor disordersquality of lifeconservative treatmentcross-shaped pessaryvolumetric pessary

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 Score at 3 Months

    The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 is a validated 20-item questionnaire for pelvic floor symptom distress. Scores range from 0 to 300, with higher scores indicating greater symptom distress. Change from baseline to 3 months is analyzed.

    Baseline and 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Device Continuation Rate at 6 Months

    6 months

  • Change From Baseline in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 Score at 3 and 6 Months

    Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

  • Change From Baseline in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Stage at 1, 3, and 6 Months

    Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months

  • Change From Baseline in Baden-Walker Grade at 1, 3, and 6 Months

    Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months

  • Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analogue Scale Score at 1, 3, and 6 Months

    Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Cross-Shaped Vaginal Pessary

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants with pelvic organ prolapse and prior traditional pessary use are fitted with a volumetric cross-shaped vaginal pessary and followed for 6 months.

Device: Volumetric Cross-Shaped Vaginal Pessary

Interventions

A medical-grade silicone vaginal pessary consisting of two intersecting closed rings arranged at approximately right angles around a shared center of symmetry, forming a three-dimensional cross-shaped structure intended to provide multi-vector support for pelvic organ prolapse. The pessary is fitted by a trained gynecologist and participants receive standardized instructions for self-removal, reinsertion, and hygiene.

Cross-Shaped Vaginal Pessary

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female participants aged 18 years or older
  • Pelvic organ prolapse stage II or higher in any compartment
  • Current use of a traditional vaginal pessary for at least 12 consecutive weeks before enrollment
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent
  • Able to attend scheduled follow-up visits or participate in telephone interviews

You may not qualify if:

  • Active vaginal or pelvic infection at enrollment
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study period
  • History of pelvic radiation therapy
  • Severe vaginal atrophy with active erosion preventing pessary use
  • Planned surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse during the study period
  • Cognitive impairment or psychiatric condition precluding informed consent or protocol compliance
  • Known allergy to silicone

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

City Clinical Hospital No. 6, Dnipro City Council

Dnipro, Ukraine

Location

Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care, Dnipro City Council

Dnipro, Ukraine

Location

City Out-Patient Clinic No. 18, Kharkiv City Council

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Regional Clinical Hospital, Poltava Regional Council

Poltava, Ukraine

Location

State Interdistrict Screening Center

Sheptytskyi, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;193(1):103-113.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996;175(1):10-17.

    BACKGROUND
  • van der Vaart LR, Vollebregt A, Milani AL, et al. Effect of pessary vs surgery on patient-reported improvement in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: the PEOPLE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;328(23):2312-2323.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hagen S, Glazener C, Sinclair L, et al. Clinical effectiveness of vaginal pessary self-management vs clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse: the TOPSY randomised controlled superiority trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;66:102326.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ ProlapseUterine ProlapsePelvic Floor Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesPregnancy ComplicationsMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mykhailo V. Medvediev, MD, PhD, DSc

    Dnipro State Medical University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
No masking was used because the investigational pessary is visibly and physically distinct from traditional vaginal pessary types.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2026

First Posted

April 28, 2026

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion

March 31, 2025

Study Completion

June 30, 2025

Last Updated

May 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations