Sacrocolpopexy With Posterior Repair Obstructed Defecation Symptoms
Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy With Posterior Repair to Reduce Obstructed Defecation Symptoms
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Participants who undergo laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) plus posterior repair (PR) will demonstrate greater improvement bowel symptom scores compared to participants who undergo LSCP alone at 3 months postoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2024
CompletedDecember 6, 2024
December 1, 2024
5.7 years
August 31, 2018
December 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary Outcome (obstructed defecation symptoms)
The primary outcome of this study (AIM 1) is to compare bowel symptom scores in patients with ODS who undergo LSCP+PR compared to those who undergo LSCP only. Our primary outcome is a composite score from Questions 4, 7, and 8 of the PFDI-20.The responses to these three questions will be summed to a maximum score of 12. The ODS questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific, scoring system commonly used in the colorectal literature, which measures constipation severity, specifically outlet obstruction. Validated pelvic floor symptom survey data using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionaire-7 (PFIQ-7), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12 (PISQ-12) will be obtained at study time points.
3 months postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary Outcome (correlation between bowel symptoms scores and 3D ultrasound measurements)
3 months postoperative
Study Arms (2)
LSCP Only
ACTIVE COMPARATORA Y-shaped polypropylene mesh graft, 10 cm in standard length and tailored to each patient's anatomic specifications during surgery, is used utilizing robot-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolopopexy.
LSCP + PR
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Laparoscopic Sacrocolopopexy involves a Y-shaped polypropylene mesh graft, 10 cm in standard length and tailored to each patient's anatomic specifications during surgery, utilizing robot-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolopopexy. In addition, patients will receive posterior repair. Posterior repair is performed by midline fascial plication. Plication of superficial perineal muscles (perineorrhaphy) is performed in conjunction with posterior repair. All repairs are performed using polydioxanone 2/0 for fascial repair and 4/0 polyglactin suture for skin closure.
Interventions
The LSCP surgery involves pulling up the bladder, vagina, and rectum using a Y-shaped mesh attached to the lower back bone
The PR surgery involves tightening the tissue between the rectum and vagina to reduce vaginal bulging during bowel movements.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female Gender
- Able to complete English language questionnaires
- Able to complete study visits for 6 months
- Bowel symptom score (PFDI-O) score ≥ 3
- Posterior vaginal bulge ≤2cm beyond the hymen
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 21
- Pregnancy
- History of colorectal surgery
- History of pelvic radiation
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- History of prior SCP
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Related Publications (2)
Frick AC, Paraiso MF. Laparoscopic management of incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;52(3):390-400. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181b0bf69.
PMID: 19661755BACKGROUNDElliott DS, Frank I, Dimarco DS, Chow GK. Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Surg. 2004 Oct;188(4A Suppl):52S-56S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.022.
PMID: 15476652BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lieschen Quiroz, MD
University of Oklahoma
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2018
First Posted
September 5, 2018
Study Start
July 19, 2018
Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Study Completion
April 1, 2024
Last Updated
December 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12