Fluid Resuscitation
15
3
4
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
80% trial completion
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 52/100
6.7%
1 terminated out of 15 trials
80.0%
-6.5% vs benchmark
13%
2 trials in Phase 3/4
25%
1 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (15)
Role of Echocardiography and Ultrasound Indices in Resuscitation of Septic Shock Patients
COrporeal Compression at the ONset of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Evaluation of the Variation of the Sub-pulmonary Velocity-time Integral to Predict Fluid Responsiveness
Impact of Fluid Resuscitation on Venous Congestion in Cardiac Critically-ill Patients
Critical Closing Pressure and PCO₂ Gap in Fluid Resuscitation for Septic Shock
Evolution of Tissue Perfusion and Venous Congestion Markers in Fluid-Responsive Septic Shock Patients
Effect of Colloids Versus Crystalloids on Heart Mechanics: a Double-blind Cross Over Randomized Trial
Dextran 40 Plus Ringer's Lactate Vs. Ringer's Lactate Alone for Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis
Restricted or Liberal Fluid for Haemodynamic Resuscitation in Sepsis
Effect of Fluid Resuscitation on Lactate in Traumatic Injury Patients
Evaluation of Fluid Resuscitation in Shocked Patients by Electrical Cardiometry in Comparison to Transthoracic Echocardiography.
Bicarbonated Ringer's Solution Versus Lactated Ringer's Solution in Patients With Septic Shock
Fluid Resuscitation in Burn Patients
Oral Rehydration Therapy in Burn Patients
Pediatric Fast Fluid Randomized Controlled Trial