Fluid Resuscitation in Burn Patients
CARE
Clearance of Acetate During Fluid Resuscitation of Critically Ill Burn Patients: The CARE Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Balanced solutions with low chloride concentration could represent an alternative to high chloride concentration solutions. Such balanced solutions contain other acid as buffers (i.e. acetate and/or gluconate). However, acetate has been associated with alteration of cardiac function when used as buffer in dialysate when high acetate concentrations are used and could promote the development of metabolic acidosis if it accumulates. Therefore, the safety of such solutions remains poorly explored. Because critically ill patients receive large amount of fluid during the early phase of resuscitation, large amount of acetate are to be administrated if such solutions are used. While acetate-containing solutions have been suggested to be safe in this setting, studies are still lacking regarding clearance and accumulation in critically ill patients. It is expected to include 28 patients, the objective to analyze the data of 20 patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Aug 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 9, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 2, 2019
CompletedDecember 13, 2019
December 1, 2019
1.1 years
April 13, 2017
December 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The main endpoint is to compare the base deficit in patients receiving Plasmalyte® or Ringer lactate after 24 hours of admission.
Arterial blood gas analysis
after 24 hours of admission.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Acetate, gluconate and lactate clearance respectively in patients receiving Plasmalyte® or Ringer lactate.
Every 6 hours for 48 hours, then every 12 hours for acid-base status during 5 days.
acid-base status and strong ion difference after 24 hours of Plasmalyte® or Ringer lactate infusion
Every 6 hours for 48 hours, then every 12 hours for acid-base status during 5 days.
Occurrence of cardiac dysfunction, defined as altered left ventricular ejection fraction(<50%)
Every day during 5 days
Incidence of AKI (according to the KDIGO definition)
Every day during 5 days
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score
During the first 5 days of intensive care unit stay
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Plasmalyte®
EXPERIMENTALPlasmalyte® is a balanced solution containing a low chloride concentration (i.e. 98 mmol/L), it also contains acetate (27 mmol/L) and gluconate (23 mmol/L) as buffer solutions.
Ringer Lactate®
EXPERIMENTALRinger Lactate® is a balanced solution containing a low chloride concentration (i.e. 111mmol/L), it also contains lactate (29 mmol/L) as buffer solutions.
Interventions
Parenteral administration of Plasmalyte initiated immediately after inclusion at a dosage of 4 ml / kg per percentage area of skin burned for the first 24 hours after burn injury and adjusted based on hemodynamic monitoring. Each patient will receive this solution up to 5 days.
Parenteral administration of Ringer lactate initiated immediately after inclusion at a dosage of 4 ml / kg per percentage area of skin burned for the first 24 hours after burn injury and adjusted based on hemodynamic monitoring. Each patient will receive this solution up to 5 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years
- TBSA\>30%
- Admission to an intensive care unit within 12 hours after burn injury
- social Insurance cover
You may not qualify if:
- Decline to participate
- pregnancy
- Metabolic alkalosis (excess of base\> 5mmol / L)
- legal obstacle to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Departement of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit; Saint-Louis hospital
Paris, 75010, France
Related Publications (5)
Hahn RG. Should anaesthetists stop infusing isotonic saline? Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jan;112(1):4-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet292. No abstract available.
PMID: 24318694BACKGROUNDShaw AD, Bagshaw SM, Goldstein SL, Scherer LA, Duan M, Schermer CR, Kellum JA. Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):821-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825074f5.
PMID: 22470070BACKGROUNDZhou F, Peng ZY, Bishop JV, Cove ME, Singbartl K, Kellum JA. Effects of fluid resuscitation with 0.9% saline versus a balanced electrolyte solution on acute kidney injury in a rat model of sepsis*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):e270-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000145.
PMID: 24335444BACKGROUNDDavies PG, Venkatesh B, Morgan TJ, Presneill JJ, Kruger PS, Thomas BJ, Roberts MS, Mundy J. Plasma acetate, gluconate and interleukin-6 profiles during and after cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison of Plasma-Lyte 148 with a bicarbonate-balanced solution. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R21. doi: 10.1186/cc9966. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
PMID: 21235742BACKGROUNDMorgan TJ, Power G, Venkatesh B, Jones MA. Acid-base effects of a bicarbonate-balanced priming fluid during cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison with Plasma-Lyte 148. A randomised single-blinded study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008 Nov;36(6):822-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0803600611.
PMID: 19115651BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthieu Legrand, MD, PhD
Departement of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit; Saint-Louis hospital, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris & University Paris Diderot
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- the crystalloid infusion solutions will be introduce in Opabag
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2017
First Posted
April 18, 2017
Study Start
August 9, 2017
Primary Completion
September 12, 2018
Study Completion
December 2, 2019
Last Updated
December 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share