EUS-Guided Coil and Glue vs Glue Injection for Bleeding Gastric Varices in Cirrhosis
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Coil and Glue Injection Versus Endoscopic Glue Injection in Patients With Cirrhosis and Gastric Variceal Bleed: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
110
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
Gastric variceal bleeding is a life-threatening complication of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic cyanoacrylate glue injection is the current standard treatment; however, recurrent bleeding and procedure-related complications remain important concerns. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided coil and cyanoacrylate glue injection has emerged as a promising alternative that may improve variceal obliteration and reduce rebleeding rates. This prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial will compare EUS-guided coil and cyanoacrylate glue injection with conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate glue injection in patients with cirrhosis presenting with bleeding gastric varices. A total of 158 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either treatment arm. The primary outcome is all-cause rebleeding at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include technical success, early and late rebleeding, number of treatment sessions required for variceal obliteration, glue volume used, procedure-related adverse events, hepatic decompensation, duration of hospital stay, cost of treatment, and mortality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2026
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2028
October 2, 2026
October 1, 2026
1.8 years
July 6, 2026
October 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
All cause rebleeding rate
Upto 12 months from index intervention
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Technical Success
During the index procedure
Early Rebleeding
Up to 6 weeks after the index intervention
Late Rebleeding
From 6 weeks to 12 months after the index intervention
Number of Treatment Sessions Required for Variceal Obliteration
Up to 12 months after randomization
Cyanoacrylate Glue Volume Utilized
Up to complete variceal obliteration
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EUS-guided Coil and Glue Injection
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to this arm will undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of bleeding gastric varices using embolization coils followed by cyanoacrylate glue injection. Additional EUS-guided treatment will be performed during follow-up if residual Doppler flow is present until complete variceal obliteration is achieved. Participants will undergo scheduled follow-up for 12 months with clinical assessment, EUS surveillance, and laboratory investigations.
Endoscopic Glue Injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to this arm will undergo conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate glue injection for treatment of bleeding gastric varices. Additional endoscopic glue injection will be performed during follow-up if residual varices are present until complete variceal obliteration is achieved. Participants will undergo scheduled follow-up for 12 months with clinical assessment, surveillance endoscopy, and laboratory investigations.
Interventions
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of gastric varices in which embolization coil(s) are deployed into the target varix through a 19-gauge EUS needle, followed by injection of cyanoacrylate glue and a 5% dextrose flush. The procedure is performed under Doppler guidance to achieve complete obliteration of blood flow within the treated varix. Additional EUS-guided treatment may be performed during follow-up until complete variceal obliteration is achieved.
Conventional endoscopic injection of cyanoacrylate glue into gastric varices using a standard sclerotherapy needle. Following endoscopic localization of the target varix, cyanoacrylate glue is injected to achieve variceal obliteration. Technical success is confirmed by hardening of the treated varix on gentle endoscopic probing. Additional endoscopic glue injection may be performed during follow-up until complete variceal obliteration is achieved.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years
- Confirmed diagnosis of liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension
- Patients presenting with suspected bleed from cardio-fundal varices, specifically classified as gastroesophageal varices type-2 (GOV-2) or isolated gastric varices type-1 (IGV-1)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients experiencing bleeding from esophageal varices (EV) or gastroesophageal varices type-1 (GOV-1) or IGV2
- Patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension
- Active spurt of blood noted from gastric varices seen on endoscopy
- Pregnancy
- Patients with refractory shock
- Sepsis/ACLF
- Platelet count \< 50,000 /mL and International Normalized Rate (INR) \> 2.0
- Contraindication to endoscopy
- Not willing to provide consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medanta, The Medicity, Indialead
- Orlando Health, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Orlando Health Orlando Regional Medical Center
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Medanta The Medicity
Gurgaon, Haryana, 122001, India
Related Publications (10)
Jhajharia A, Yadav S, Singh S, Ashdhir P, Nijhawan S. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided coil embolization and cyanoacrylate injection versus cyanoacrylate injection alone for gastric varices: a randomized comparative study. Endoscopy. 2025 Feb;57(2):107-115. doi: 10.1055/a-2408-6905. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
PMID: 39293480BACKGROUNDFlorencio de Mesquita C, Antunes VLJ, Milioli NJ, Fernandes MV, Correa TL, Martins OC, Chavan R, Baraldo S. EUS-guided coiling plus glue injection compared with endoscopic glue injection alone in endoscopic treatment for gastric varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Feb;101(2):331-340.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.005. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
PMID: 39389435BACKGROUNDJamwal KD, Padhan RK, Sharma A, Sharma MK. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided coiling and glue is safe and superior to endoscopic glue injection in gastric varices with severe liver disease: a retrospective case control study. Clin Endosc. 2023 Jan;56(1):65-74. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.119. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
PMID: 36594180BACKGROUNDThiruvengadam SS, Sedarat A. The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) in the Management of Gastric Varices. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2021 Jan 2;23(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11894-020-00801-2.
PMID: 33389241BACKGROUNDCheng LF, Wang ZQ, Li CZ, Lin W, Yeo AE, Jin B. Low incidence of complications from endoscopic gastric variceal obturation with butyl cyanoacrylate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Sep;8(9):760-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.05.019. Epub 2010 May 31.
PMID: 20621678BACKGROUNDSoehendra N, Nam VC, Grimm H, Kempeneers I. Endoscopic obliteration of large esophagogastric varices with bucrylate. Endoscopy. 1986 Jan;18(1):25-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1013014.
PMID: 3512261BACKGROUNDVine LJ, Subhani M, Acevedo JG. Update on management of gastric varices. World J Hepatol. 2019 Mar 27;11(3):250-260. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i3.250.
PMID: 30967903BACKGROUNDMohan BP, Chandan S, Khan SR, Kassab LL, Trakroo S, Ponnada S, Asokkumar R, Adler DG. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy versus direct endoscopic glue injection therapy for gastric varices: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2020 Apr;52(4):259-267. doi: 10.1055/a-1098-1817. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
PMID: 32028533BACKGROUNDWeilert F, Binmoeller KF. Endoscopic management of gastric variceal bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014 Dec;43(4):807-18. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
PMID: 25440927BACKGROUNDGarcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Bosch J. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2017 Jan;65(1):310-335. doi: 10.1002/hep.28906. Epub 2016 Dec 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 27786365BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Vice Chairman, Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2026
First Posted
October 2, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Last Updated
October 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share