NCT07855094

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the wavelight plus Sightmap (WLP) method or the wavefront-optimized (WFO) method for calculating LASIK customization treatment gives better vision, better satisfaction, and fewer symptoms afterward. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.Does the WLP method provide better vision than WFO method?
  2. 2.Does the WLP method provide better patient satisfaction and less symptoms than WFO method?
  3. 3.Receive LASIK in both eyes: one eye will receive WLP-LASIK and the other will receive WFO-LASIK.
  4. 4.Be in the study for about three months and will have six clinic visits: a pre-op qualification exam, the surgery visit, and follow-up visits on 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery.
  5. 5.Have several eye test to assess vision and complete a symptom questionnaire. This questionnaire will take approximately ten (10) minutes to complete in person during.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
3mo left

Started Jan 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress75%
Jan 2026Dec 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 6, 2026

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 28, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 2, 2026

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2026

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

October 2, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

September 28, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 28, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Ray-tracingLASIKwavefront-optimizedwavelight plus SightMap

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of eyes achieving MRSE within ±0.25D at 3-month Post-Op

    Post-operative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) within ±0.25D at POM3; unit = percentage of eyes

    3-months Post-Op

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of eyes with Uncorrected Visual Acuity of 20/16 or better at 3-month Post-Op

    3-month Post-Op

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Change in high contrast visual acuity at 3-month Post-Op

    Change from baseline (pre-op) to 3-month Post-Op

  • Change in refractive error at 3-month Post-Op

    Change from baseline (pre-op) to 3-month Post-Op

  • Change in low contrast visual acuity at 3-month Post-Op

    Change from baseline (pre-op) to 3-month Post-Op

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

wavelight plus SightMap-guided LASIK (WLP-LASIK)

EXPERIMENTAL

Eye having LASIK Surgery guided by Wavelight Plus SightMap (WLP)

Procedure: wavelight plus Sightmap (WLP) Guided LASIK calculated

Wavefront-Optimized LASIK (WFO-LASIK)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Eye having Wavefront-Optimized LASIK eye surgery

Procedure: LASIK calculated ablation using Wavefront-Optimized

Interventions

WFO LASIK

Wavefront-Optimized LASIK (WFO-LASIK)

WLP Sightmap

wavelight plus SightMap-guided LASIK (WLP-LASIK)

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and Females between the ages of 21 and 50
  • Monocular CDVA of 20/20 or better
  • Nearsightedness between -2.00 diopters and -8.00 diopters
  • Have similar levels of nearsightedness in each eye (≤2D of difference between eyes)
  • Total spherical equivalent (SE) of no more than -9.0 D
  • Less than or equal to 3.00 diopters of astigmatism
  • Stable refraction (within ±0.50 D) as determined by MRSE for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery
  • ≤0.50 D MRSE difference between cycloplegic and subjective manifest refractions
  • Active duty and Beneficiary on Tricare Prime or Tricare Select
  • Residing within 60 miles radius from Lackland AFB
  • Willing and able to attend all scheduled study visits as required per protocol

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with corneal abnormal findings including signs of keratoconus, keratoconus suspect, abnormal corneal topography, epithelial basement membrane disease, pellucid marginal degeneration, corneal degenerations, recurrent corneal erosion, progressive and unstable myopia, irregular or unstable corneal mires on central keratometry images, and subjects whose corneal thickness would cause anticipated treatment would violate the posterior 250 microns (μm) of corneal stroma from the corneal endothelium.
  • Subjects with any ocular disease such as advanced/uncontrolled glaucoma, strabismus, severe dry eye, active eye infection or inflammation, recent herpes eye infection or problems resulting from past infection, or having a cardiac pacemaker/implanted defibrillator.
  • Subjects with active collagen vascular, connective tissue, autoimmune or immunodeficiency diseases
  • Pregnant or nursing females (pregnancy test will be performed on females subjects of childbearing potential)
  • Systemic disease likely to affect wound healing, such as diabetes and severe atopy, severe allergies
  • Taking the medication Isotretinoin (Accutane), Amiodarone hydrochloride (Cordaroneor), Sumatriptan succinate (Imitrex), antimetabolites for any medical condition
  • Potential candidate who cannot provide Informed Consent will not be allowed to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Joint Warfighter Refractive Surgery Center, JBSA Lackland AFB

San Antonio, Texas, 78236, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Khoramnia R, Naujokaitis T, Block L, Fabian K, Kessler LJ, Labuz G, Auffarth GU. Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Automated Customized Ray-Tracing-Guided versus Wavefront-Optimized LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2025 Oct;132(10):1169-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.05.025. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

    PMID: 40482723BACKGROUND
  • Cao X, Zhang J, Shao J, Zhang Y, Zheng L. Study of the InnovEyes Sightmap Platform in Comparing Ray-Tracing-Guided LASIK and Topography-Guided LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2024 Dec;40(12):e994-e1002. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03. Epub 2024 Dec 1.

    PMID: 39656251BACKGROUND
  • Kanellopoulos AJ. Ray-Tracing Customization in Myopic and Myopic Astigmatism LASIK Treatments for Low and High Order Aberrations Treatment: 2-Year Visual Function and Psychometric Value Outcomes of a Consecutive Case Series. Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 22;18:565-574. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S444174. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 38410630BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

MyopiaAstigmatism

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Paramjit K Bhullar, MD

    59th Medical Wing

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
This is a prospective randomized double blind contralateral study. The patient and the staff doing the post-op evaluations will be blinded to which eye received which treatment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective randomized contralateral study.
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2026

First Posted

October 2, 2026

Study Start

January 6, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

October 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations