NCT07201298

Brief Summary

This purpose of this study is to compare a new form of LASIK called Ray Tracing Guided LASIK to 3 other forms of corneal refractive surgery: 1. KLEx (KeratoLenticule Extraction) using the Zeiss Visumax 800 Laser, 2. WFO LASIK (Wavefront Optimized LASIK) using the Alcon EX500 Laser, and 3. Topography Guided LASIK (Contoura LASIK) also using the Alcon EX500 Laser.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
41mo left

Started Sep 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress17%
Sep 2025Sep 2029

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2025

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2028

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2029

Last Updated

October 1, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

September 23, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

refractive surgerymyopiaastigmatismexcimer laserfemtosecond laserRay TracingLenticuleSMILEKLExContouraTopography Guided LASIKWavefront Optimized

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Uncorrected Visual Acuity

    Percentage of eyes acheiving uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40, 20/25, 20/20, 20/16, 20/12.5, and 20/10 at post-operative month 3, 6 and 12

    3, 6 and 12 month

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Predictability

    3, 6, and 12 months

Study Arms (6)

ARM 1: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OD and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction in OS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects receive Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in the RIGHT EYE and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction in the LEFT EYE

Device: Ray-Tracing Guided LASIKDevice: Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx)

ARM 2: WaveLight Plus LASIK in OS and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction in OD

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects receive Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in the LEFT EYE and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction in the RIGHT EYE

Device: Ray-Tracing Guided LASIKDevice: Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx)

ARM 3: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OD and Wavefront Optimized LASIK in OS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects receive Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in the RIGHT EYE and Wavefront Optimized LASIK in the LEFT EYE.

Device: Ray-Tracing Guided LASIKDevice: WaveFront Optimized LASIK

ARM 4: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OS and Wavefront Optimized LASIK in OD

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects receive Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in the LEFT EYE and Wavefront Optimized LASIK in the RIGHT EYE

Device: Ray-Tracing Guided LASIKDevice: WaveFront Optimized LASIK

ARM 5: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OD and Topography Guided LASIK in OS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects receive Ray Tracing Guided in the RIGHT EYE and Topography Guided LASIK in the LEFT EYE

Device: Ray-Tracing Guided LASIKDevice: Topography Guided LASIK

ARM 6: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OS and Topography Guided LASIK in OD

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects receive Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in the LEFT EYE and Topography Guided LASIK in the RIGHT EYE

Device: Ray-Tracing Guided LASIKDevice: Topography Guided LASIK

Interventions

A form of LASIK where Ray-Tracing technology is used to create the surgical profile for treating the cornea.

ARM 1: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OD and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction in OSARM 2: WaveLight Plus LASIK in OS and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction in ODARM 3: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OD and Wavefront Optimized LASIK in OSARM 4: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OS and Wavefront Optimized LASIK in ODARM 5: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OD and Topography Guided LASIK in OSARM 6: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OS and Topography Guided LASIK in OD

A form of corneal refractive surgery utilizing a femtosecond laser to create a lens shaped lenticule of corneal tissue that is removed through a small corneal incision.

ARM 1: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OD and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction in OSARM 2: WaveLight Plus LASIK in OS and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction in OD

A form of LASIK where the corneal treatment profile is modified to decrease induced Spherical Aberration.

ARM 3: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OD and Wavefront Optimized LASIK in OSARM 4: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OS and Wavefront Optimized LASIK in OD

A form of LASIK where a corneal topography of the cornea is used to create the surgical profile for treating the cornea.

ARM 5: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OD and Topography Guided LASIK in OSARM 6: Ray Tracing Guided LASIK in OS and Topography Guided LASIK in OD

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 22-50 at the time of consent
  • Diagnosis of myopia or myopia with astigmatism with Preoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction of ≥ -2.00 and ≤ -9.00 D (-2.00 D through -9.00 D)
  • Preop Spherical component of ≥ -2.00 and ≤ -8.00 D (-2.00 D through -8.00 D)
  • Refractive Cylinder of ≤ -3.00 D (0.00 through -3.00 D)
  • BCVA of 20/20 or better in each eye (83 or more letters on the ETDRS Chart)
  • Subjects must have a stable refraction which is defined as a change in spherical equivalent no greater than 0.50 D comparing the screening visit manifest refraction to a previous refraction, spectacle Rx, or contact lens Rx, 12 months or older.
  • Subjects who are contact lens wearers must discontinue the use of soft lenses (spherical or toric) for at least 5 days and hard or gas-permeable lenses for at least 4 weeks prior to the preoperative screening evaluation. Hard or gas-permeable lens wearers must not return to contact lens use before surgery. Soft lens wearers may resume contact lens wear after all preoperative testing is completed, but must discontinue lens use at least 5 days before surgery.
  • Acceptable preoperative tomography and examination results for refractive procedures as determined by the Principal Investigator.
  • Surgical plan includes treatment target for emmetropia in both eyes, and no monovision.
  • Subject is capable and willing to use postoperative medications as prescribed.
  • Subject has ability to successfully complete all preoperative and postoperative questionnaires, testing, and exam visits.
  • Subject is willing and able to return for all postoperative examinations.

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinically significant dry eye on clinical examination, as determined by the investigator
  • Irregular astigmatism, keratoconus, keratoconus suspect, or abnormal corneal tomography
  • History of corneal dystrophies or guttata
  • History of herpetic keratitis or active disease
  • History of prior refractive surgery
  • History of glaucoma or glaucoma suspect
  • History of uncontrolled diabetes, unstable hypertension, or unstable autoimmune disease.
  • Females who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or intend to become pregnant any time during the study as determined by verbal inquiry.
  • The Principal Investigator has determined the subject not to be a good candidate for the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hoopes Moshirfar Research Center

Draper, Utah, 84020, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (15)

  • Khoramnia R, Lohmann CP, Wuellner C, Kobuch KA, Donitzky C, Winkler von Mohrenfels C. Effect of 3 excimer laser ablation frequencies (200 Hz, 500 Hz, 1000 Hz) on the cornea using a 1000 Hz scanning-spot excimer laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Aug;36(8):1385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.033.

    PMID: 20656164BACKGROUND
  • Winkler von Mohrenfels C, Khoramnia R, Lohmann CP. Comparison of different excimer laser ablation frequencies (50, 200, and 500 Hz). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;247(11):1539-45. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1102-x. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

    PMID: 19597838BACKGROUND
  • Meidani A, Tzavara C. Comparison of efficacy, safety, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis using two laser suites. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 24;10:1639-46. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S110626. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27601880BACKGROUND
  • Mrochen M, Donitzky C, Wullner C, Loffler J. Wavefront-optimized ablation profiles: theoretical background. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Apr;30(4):775-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.01.026.

    PMID: 15093638BACKGROUND
  • Mrochen M, Seiler T. Influence of corneal curvature on calculation of ablation patterns used in photorefractive laser surgery. J Refract Surg. 2001 Sep-Oct;17(5):S584-7. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20010901-15.

    PMID: 11583235BACKGROUND
  • Ganesh S, Brar S, Swamy DT. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following SMILE Performed With the VisuMax 800 in One Eye and VisuMax 500 in the Contralateral Eye. J Refract Surg. 2025 Jan;41(1):e14-e21. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20241113-02. Epub 2025 Jan 1.

    PMID: 39783817BACKGROUND
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Potter JG, Gupta R, Wiltfang R. Refractive and Visual Outcomes of SMILE for Compound Myopic Astigmatism With the VISUMAX 800. J Refract Surg. 2023 May;39(5):294-301. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230301-02. Epub 2023 May 1.

    PMID: 37162399BACKGROUND
  • Teus MA, Garcia-Gonzalez M. Comparison of the visual results after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):582. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140819-01. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25208349BACKGROUND
  • Pinero DP, Teus MA. Clinical outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jul;42(7):1078-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.05.004.

    PMID: 27492109BACKGROUND
  • Ganesh S, Gupta R. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):590-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02.

    PMID: 25250415BACKGROUND
  • Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jan;37(1):127-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.033.

    PMID: 21183108BACKGROUND
  • Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;95(3):335-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.174284. Epub 2010 Jul 3.

    PMID: 20601657BACKGROUND
  • Blum M, Taubig K, Gruhn C, Sekundo W, Kunert KS. Five-year results of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;100(9):1192-5. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306822. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

    PMID: 26746577BACKGROUND
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes. Eye Vis (Lond). 2014 Oct 16;1:3. doi: 10.1186/s40662-014-0003-1. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 26605350BACKGROUND
  • Lee JK, Chuck RS, Park CY. Femtosecond laser refractive surgery: small-incision lenticule extraction vs. femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;26(4):260-4. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000158.

    PMID: 26058022BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

MyopiaAstigmatism

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Majid Moshirfar, MD

    Hoopes Vision

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Steven H Linn, OD

CONTACT

Shealynn Petersen, BS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A= Ray-Tracing Guided LASIK (RTGL) B= Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) C=WaveFront Optimized LASIK (WFOL) D= Topography Guided LASIK (TGL) This is a contralateral eye study with 3 different phases: Phase 1 has 2 Arms: Arm 1 consists of 22 subjects who have RTGL in the Right Eye and KLEx in the Left Eye, Arm 2 consists of 22 subjects who have KLEx in the Right Eye and RTGL in the Left Eye. Phase 2 has 2 Arms: Arm 1 consists of 22 subjects who have RTGL in the Right Eye and WFOL in the Left Eye, Arm 2 consists of 22 subjects who have WFOL in the Right Eye and RTGL in the Left Eye. Phase 3 has 2 Arms: Arm 1 consists of 22 subjects who have RTGL in the Right Eye and TGL in the Left Eye, Arm 2 consists of 22 subjects who have TGL in the Right Eye and RTGL in the Left Eye.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2025

First Posted

October 1, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Last Updated

October 1, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations