Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of UV-Treated Dental Implants With or Without Melatonin in the Upper Posterior Jaw
UV-MEL-IMPLANT
Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Photofunctionalized Dental Implants With or Without Melatonin in the Posterior Maxilla
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using photofunctionalized (UV-treated) dental implants with or without the application of melatonin hormone in the posterior maxilla (upper back jaw). The posterior maxilla is known to have lower bone quality, which can negatively affect the primary and secondary stability of dental implants,. UV photofunctionalization is a method that modifies the titanium surface of the implant, changing it from hydrophobic (water-repelling) to superhydrophilic (water-attracting). This enhancement aims to accelerate protein adsorption and promote bone-building cells (osteoblasts). On the other hand, melatonin acts as an anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agent that stimulates bone formation and reduces bone resorption. A total of 21 dental implants will be placed in patients requiring tooth replacement in the posterior maxilla. The implants will be divided into three main approaches: one using UV-treated implants alone, and the other combining UV-treated implants with melatonin. and one using conventional implant Patients will be followed up clinically and radiographically to assess implant stability, bone healing, and overall implant success over time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 21, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 21, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 21, 2026
October 2, 2026
September 1, 2026
9 months
September 27, 2026
September 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Implant Stability (ISQ)
Implant stability will be measured using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) to obtain the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) value. Higher ISQ values indicate greater primary and secondary implant stability.
At the time of implant placement (baseline), 2, 4, weeks, 3 and 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Marginal Bone Level Changes
At the time of implant placement (baseline), 3 months, and 9 months post-operatively.
Study Arms (3)
Experimental: UV-Implant + Melatonin
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will receive ultraviolet (UV) photofunctionalized dental implants combined with the topical application of melatonin hormone at the implant site in the posterior maxilla to evaluate early bone formation.
Active Comparator: UV-Implant Alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group will receive ultraviolet (UV) photofunctionalized dental implants alone without the application of melatonin hormone in the posterior maxilla to serve as the active control group.
Conventional Dental Implant
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group will receive conventional titanium dental implants in the posterior maxilla to serve as the baseline control group.
Interventions
Commercial titanium dental implants subjected to ultraviolet (UV) light irradiation immediately prior to surgical placement to convert the surface property from hydrophobic to superhydrophilic.
Standard commercial titanium dental implants placed using traditional surgical protocols without any UV surface photofunctionalization or melatonin application.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 18 and 60 years old.
- Patients seeking replacement of missed single or multiple teeth in the posterior maxilla.
- Sufficient bone volume (height and width) to accommodate dental implant placement without major bone grafting.
- Good oral hygiene and motivated patients.
- Systemically healthy patients with no contraindications for minor oral surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases
- Patients who received radiation therapy in the head and neck region within the last 5 years.
- Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day).
- Patients with active periodontal disease or poor oral hygiene.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- Parafunctional habits such as severe bruxism or clenching.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Related Publications (10)
Soler G, Bernal-Vicente A, Anton AI, Torregrosa JM, Caparros-Perez E, Sanchez-Serrano I, Martinez-Perez A, Sanchez-Vega B, Vicente V, Ferrer-Marin F. The JAK2 46/1 haplotype does not predispose to CALR-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms. Ann Hematol. 2015 May;94(5):789-94. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2266-y. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
PMID: 25482455BACKGROUNDLindquist SG, Braedgaard H, Svenstrup K, Isaacs AM, Nielsen JE; FReJA Consortium. Frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 3 (FTD-3)--current concepts and the detection of a previously unknown branch of the Danish FTD-3 family. Eur J Neurol. 2008 Jul;15(7):667-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02144.x. Epub 2008 May 15.
PMID: 18484988BACKGROUNDRocchigiani G, Ricci E, Navarro MA, Samol MA, Uzal FA. Leukocyte numbers and intestinal mucosal morphometrics in horses with no clinical intestinal disease. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2022 May;34(3):389-395. doi: 10.1177/10406387211031944. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
PMID: 34293980BACKGROUNDTian X, Raina DB, Vater C, Kilian D, Ahlfeld T, Platzek I, Nimtschke U, Tagil M, Lidgren L, Thomas A, Platz U, Schaser KD, Disch AC, Zwingenberger S. Evaluation of an Injectable Biphasic Calcium Sulfate/Hydroxyapatite Cement for the Augmentation of Fenestrated Pedicle Screws in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Biomechanical Cadaver Study. J Funct Biomater. 2022 Dec 1;13(4):269. doi: 10.3390/jfb13040269.
PMID: 36547529BACKGROUNDChen DW, Yu HH, Luo LJ, Rajesh Kumar S, Chen CH, Lin TY, Lai JY, Jessie Lue S. Osteoblast Biocompatibility and Antibacterial Effects Using 2-Methacryloyloxyethyl Phosphocholine-Grafted Stainless-Steel Composite for Implant Applications. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019 Jun 28;9(7):939. doi: 10.3390/nano9070939.
PMID: 31261737BACKGROUNDLang X, Qiao B, Ge Z, Yan J, Zhang Y. Clinical Effects of Photofunctionalization on Implant Stability and Marginal Bone Loss: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 28;11(23):7042. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237042.
PMID: 36498616BACKGROUNDLee D, Lee JS, Sezirahiga J, Kwon HC, Jang DS, Kang KS. Bioactive Phytochemicals Isolated from Akebia quinata Enhances Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion by Inducing PDX-1. Plants (Basel). 2020 Aug 24;9(9):1087. doi: 10.3390/plants9091087.
PMID: 32847055BACKGROUNDNganda B, Wang'ombe J, Floyd K, Kangangi J. Cost and cost-effectiveness of increased community and primary care facility involvement in tuberculosis care in Machakos District, Kenya. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Sep;7(9 Suppl 1):S14-20.
PMID: 12971650BACKGROUNDMatsuo T, Mori N, Sakurai A, Furukawa K. Varicella-zoster virus myeloencephalitis. IDCases. 2017 Oct 20;10:110-111. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2017.10.006. eCollection 2017. No abstract available.
PMID: 29124011BACKGROUNDColl AM, Ameen JR, Mead D. Postoperative pain assessment tools in day surgery: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Apr;46(2):124-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02972.x.
PMID: 15056325BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study is single-blinded. The outcomes assessor responsible for radiographic and statistical data analysis will be blinded to the treatment assignment of each implant.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2026
First Posted
October 2, 2026
Study Start
February 21, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 21, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 21, 2026
Last Updated
October 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09