The Effects of Oxytocin on Fairness Perception and Related Prosocial Behaviors
The Modulatory Effects of Oxytocin on Fairness Perception and Related Prosocial Behaviors
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate the modulation of intranasally administered oxytocin (24 IU) on human fairness perception and related prosocial behaviors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
September 11, 2026
September 1, 2026
4 months
September 3, 2026
September 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Fairness rating scores
Participants are asked to rate their perceived levels of fairness on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = highly fair, 9 = highly unfair) to the computer's allocation in each trial.
1 hour
Anticipated guilt rating scores
Participants are asked to rate the anticipated guilt they would feel if they accepted the allocation given by the computer in each trial. Ratings were conducted on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 9 = highly guilty).
1 hour
The binary decision to the initial allocation
Participants are asked to makde decisions of accepting or rejecting the allocation provided by the computer in each trial.
1 hour
Brain activity patterns
Brain activity patterns in response to the outcome of the allocation given by computer and the binary decision. We will examine these brain response patterns via both the conventional univariate analysis and the machine learning-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) approaches.
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Inequity aversion parameters derived from the Fehr-Schmidt model
1 hour
Study Arms (2)
oxytocin group
EXPERIMENTALmale and female subjects with oxytocin treatment
placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORmale and female subjects with placebo treatment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy subjects without past or current psychiatric or neurological disorders.
You may not qualify if:
- History of head injury; pregnant, menstruating, taking oral contraceptives; medical or psychiatric illness.
- The presence of metal in the body or claustrophobia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC)
Chengdu, Sichuan, 611731, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shuxia Yao, Dr
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2026
First Posted
September 11, 2026
Study Start
September 5, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
September 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share