NCT07814261

Brief Summary

ParentText, a WhatsApp-based parenting support programme, is designed as a universal intervention to improve parent-child relationships (module 1) and promote child safety (module 2). The SWIFT study is an explanatory sequential time series design with an embedded randomised controlled trial. The time-series design aims to assess whether a digital parenting support programme, ParentText, can be embedded effectively into the regular services offered by the Department of Health and Wellness in the Western Cape, South Africa, and to explore factors affecting parent engagement. The embedded randomised controlled trial tests whether the second module affects sexual violence reduction against children. Participants include caregivers 18 years and older, living in South Africa, and caring for at least one child aged 2 to 17 years. The primary outcome measures of the study are both implementation 1): Assessing which of four approaches to advertising the ParentText programme leads to the highest rates of programme uptake, engagement, and completion; and programmatic: Testing the effectiveness of the additional Child Safety Module in 2) - reducing child sexual violence vulnerability, 3) - increasing child sexual violence risk planning and 4) - reducing child sexual violence exposure. The secondary outcomes assess changes in programme users' self-reported parenting behaviour in terms of 1) positive involvement, 2) positive parenting, 3) parent mental health, 4) parent support of education, 5) caregiver child/ adolescent communication, 6) online safety, 7) harsh parenting, 8) child or adolescent behavioural problems; and assessing users' experience of the 9) accessibility of the chatbot, 10) acceptability of the chatbot; and 11) adolescents' report of their sexual violence risk and safety planning communication.. In the first period of the time series design, participants will be recruited via posters, which provide a WhatsApp number for the programme, at their local clinic. Once they join, they will be provided with information on the study and be invited to consent to participate. If they consent, they will complete a baseline survey and then be able to move on to the first 5-day module. On consent to the study, participants will be placed randomly into either the group that receives the second module (intervention group) or a control group that will receive the module only after the study is completed. Both the intervention group and the control group receive the one-month and three-month surveys. In the second, third, and fourth time periods, everything remains the same except the encouragement method. In the first time period, only posters were used for recruitment. Within the second period, one month later, recruitment will be via both posters and additional encouragement from clinic staff. Clinic staff will encourage either verbally or by providing the caregiver with a flyer during their clinic visit. Throughout both these recruitment periods (1) and (2), caregivers who have completed the programme can share it on social media by posting predesigned tiles that include the joining information for the chatbot. Should our ideal sample size (4,000 participants) not be reached through these mechanisms, there will be an additional time period (3-4 weeks; time period three) during which the study team will advertise directly on Facebook. Finally, should our sample size not be reached in this third period, there will be a fourth time period of advertising that offers ZAR50 (approximately USD3) in airtime to those who sign up. This ZAR50 will be provided in sums of: ZAR15 for completing each of the baseline and one-month questionnaires, and ZAR20 for completing the three-month questionnaire. Once the three-month questionnaires are completed, participants will also be invited to a focus group discussion or telephonic interviews. Participants will be purposively selected from the group of participants who consent to the qualitative data collection phase. The focus groups will be conducted with participants residing in the Western Cape province, who completed one or both modules, and will discuss topics such as their experience of the ParentText programme, and the encouragement. For the telephonic interviews, participants will be purposely selected for interviews, looking at a) caregivers' experience of the child safety module, b) reasons for engaging/not engaging with the programme, and c) which referral services they accessed. Further, adolescents (over the age of 12 years) will be recruited via their caregivers - upon completion of the 3-month survey, parents or legal guardians will be asked to provide consent for the team to contact their adolescent to undertake a telephonic survey and, in some cases, a qualitative interview with them. Teens will complete informed assent.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
4,961

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Feb 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress90%
Feb 2026Oct 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 2, 2026

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 26, 2026

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 10, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2026

Last Updated

September 10, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

August 26, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

PreventionDigital InterventionParentingViolence against ChildrenSexual Violence RiskTime Series DesignRandomised Controlled TrialSouth AfricaPublic Health SystemChild SafetyChild ProtectionInterventionLow- and Middle-Income Countries

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Engagement with the Chatbot

    Uptake, engagement, and completion are measured using process data embedded within the chatbot, including programme uptake, frequency of logging in, duration of engagement, and completion rates of assigned content modules.

    Continuously throughout the three-month period that the chatbot is open.

  • Sexual Violence Vulnerability

    Sexual violence vulnerability is assessed using caregiver-reported items from the Global Parenting Initiative, measuring children's and adolescents' exposure to unsafe situations in their communities. The measure includes five items for adolescents and four for children. Caregivers report how often in the past week their child or teen: spent time with untrusted friends; was unsupervised at home or outside (children) or went to taverns or drank with friends (teens); took a lift with someone unknown; or stayed away overnight without the caregiver knowing their whereabouts or returned late. Caregivers of adolescents also report their adolescents receiving sexual comments from older individuals. Responses are coded as (0) Never, (1) Sometimes (1-2 times), or (2) Often (3 or more times), with "I don't know" coded as 777 and "prefer not to say" coded as 888. Scores are summed for a total vulnerability score.

    Baseline pre-intervention, 1 month post-baseline, 3 months post-baseline. Participants have one week to complete the questionnaire.

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Caregiver Positive Involvement

    Baseline pre-intervention, 1 month post-baseline, 3 months post-baseline. Participants have one week to complete each questionnaire.

  • Positive Parenting

    Baseline pre-intervention, 1 month post-baseline, 3 months post-baseline. Participants have one week to complete each questionnaire.

  • Parent Mental Health

    Baseline pre-intervention, 1 month post-baseline, 3 months post-baseline. Participants have one week to complete each questionnaire.

  • Caregiver Safety Planning Communication

    Baseline pre-intervention, 1 month post-baseline, 3 months post-baseline. Caregivers have one week to complete each questionnaire.

  • Child Sexual Violence Exposure

    Baseline pre-intervention, 1 month post-baseline, 3 months post-baseline. Participants have one week to complete each questionnaire.

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Number and type of referral services accessed

    From baseline to up to 6 months post-baseline.

  • Cost of implementation of the intervention.

    From set-up through duration that chatbot is open to participants.

Study Arms (2)

Child Safety Module

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental group received a five-day module intended to educate parents about keeping their child safe from online and offline sexual violence (in addiion to a foundational relationship strengthening module).

Behavioral: Module 1 - Improve My Relationship with My Teen/ChildBehavioral: Module 2 - Keep My Child/Teen Safe and Healthy

Waitlist Control

OTHER

Those randomized to the waitlist control will be offered the child safety module after all data has been collected (but will still be able to access the same foundational relationship strengthening module as the experimental group).

Behavioral: Module 1 - Improve My Relationship with My Teen/Child

Interventions

Module 1 aims to improve caregiver-child relationships. The module has 5 daily lessons. The lessons take 10 minutes a day. The lessons include: 1. Spending One-on-One Time with My Child/Teen, 2. Giving Praise, 3. Creating a Routine for One-On-One Time, 4. Noticing Feelings During One-On-One Time, 5. Keeping Calm When We Are Stressed

Child Safety ModuleWaitlist Control

Module 2 aims to promote child safety. The module has 5 daily lessons. The lessons take 10 minutes a day. The lessons include: 1. Community Safety 2. Responding to Crises 3. Knowing the Basics of Online Safety 4. Build Habits and Trust Online 5. For children: Teaching Safe Touch or For teens: Prevent Sexual Violence

Child Safety Module

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Have worked at one of the study site clinics, during the periods of recruitment
  • Encouraged caregivers during this period
  • Parents or caregivers of any child aged 2-17 years old
  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • Residing in South Africa
  • Willing to provide informed consent to participate in the study
  • Sufficiently fluent in English, Afrikaans, or IsiXhosa
  • Be an adolescent of a caregiver who has started the 3-month follow-up survey
  • Aged 12-17 years old for the surveys and qualitative interviews
  • Have received consent from their parent/caregiver to partake in the study
  • Are willing to provide informed assent to participate
  • Residing in South Africa
  • Sufficiently fluent in English, Afrikaans or IsiXhosa
  • Have successfully enrolled in the study, therefore meets the eligibility criteria of the study (\*as mentioned above)
  • Have accessed at least one referral
  • +5 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Cape Town (recruitment sites confidential)

Cape Town, Western Cape, 7700, South Africa

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Šmahel, D., Macháčková, H., Mascheroni, G., Dědková, L., Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K., Livingstone, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/103294/1/EU_Kids_Online_2020_March2020.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Kariger P, Frongillo EA, Engle P, Britto PM, Sywulka SM, Menon P. Indicators of family care for development for use in multicountry surveys. J Health Popul Nutr. 2012 Dec;30(4):472-86. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v30i4.13417.

    PMID: 23304914BACKGROUND
  • Bhana A, Rathod SD, Selohilwe O, Kathree T, Petersen I. The validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire for screening depression in chronic care patients in primary health care in South Africa. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 May 23;15:118. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0503-0.

    PMID: 26001915BACKGROUND
  • Cianchetti C, Pittau A, Carta V, Campus G, Littarru R, Ledda MG, Zuddas A, Fancello GS. Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI): A New Instrument for Epidemiological Studies and Pre-Clinical Evaluation. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2013;9:51-61. doi: 10.2174/1745017901309010051. Epub 2013 Feb 22.

    PMID: 23539369BACKGROUND
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Chapter 10: Mixed methods procedures. In Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed., pp. 213-246). SAGE Publications.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lee GY, Latimer MC, Kelly SM, Verinumbe T, Agee T, Hutton H, Lesko C, Jones J, Schwartz S, Hsu J, Falade-Nwulia O. Utility of the brief Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 screeners for depression and generalized anxiety symptom identification in people with human immunodeficiency virus. HIV Res Clin Pract. 2026 Dec 31;27(1):2616103. doi: 10.1080/25787489.2026.2616103. Epub 2026 Jan 21.

    PMID: 41566210BACKGROUND
  • Staples LG, Dear BF, Gandy M, Fogliati V, Fogliati R, Karin E, Nielssen O, Titov N. Psychometric properties and clinical utility of brief measures of depression, anxiety, and general distress: The PHQ-2, GAD-2, and K-6. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;56:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

    PMID: 30508772BACKGROUND
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Lowe B. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4. Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.50.6.613.

    PMID: 19996233BACKGROUND
  • Lowe B, Kroenke K, Grafe K. Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2). J Psychosom Res. 2005 Feb;58(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.09.006.

    PMID: 15820844BACKGROUND
  • Meinck F, Boyes ME, Cluver L, Ward CL, Schmidt P, DeStone S, Dunne MP. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool for use in trials (ICAST-Trial) among South African adolescents and their primary caregivers. Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Aug;82:45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 31.

    PMID: 29860107BACKGROUND
  • McCarty, C.M., & Doyle, S.R. (2001). Parent-Child Communication (Child) (Technical Report). http://www.fasttrackproject.org/

    BACKGROUND
  • Ceballo R, Maurizi LK, Suarez GA, Aretakis MT. Gift and sacrifice: parental involvement in Latino adolescents' education. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2014 Jan;20(1):116-27. doi: 10.1037/a0033472. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

    PMID: 23834259BACKGROUND
  • Clerkin SM, Marks DJ, Policaro KL, Halperin JM. Psychometric properties of the Alabama parenting questionnaire-preschool revision. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2007 Mar;36(1):19-28. doi: 10.1080/15374410709336565.

    PMID: 17206878BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Personal SatisfactionBehavior

Study Officials

  • Catherine L Ward, PhD

    University of Cape Town

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: This study will adopt an explanatory sequential model (Creswell \& Creswell, 2017). The quantitative phase employs a time series design with an embedded randomised controlled trial. Quantitative data collection will be gathered using surveys and process data (both collected within the chatbot). The results of the quantitative data will be used to inform the groups who will be qualitatively interviewed and the questions asked of them. Although tentatively designed, the qualitative interviews will explore results from the quantitative surveys. Focus groups and interviews (telephonic and in-person) will be conducted with caregivers, their adolescents, and clinic staff.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2026

First Posted

September 10, 2026

Study Start

February 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Last Updated

September 10, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The quantitative (chatbot survey and adolescent telephonic survey) data will be deidentified and published on UCT's open access portal, ZivaHub. Qualitative data will not be published due to deductive disclosure.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE

Locations