Teaching Doctors in Training to Reason With Artificial Intelligence
TEACH-AI
Teaching Internal Medicine and Family Medicine Residents to Reason With Generative AI: A Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial (TEACH-AI)
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of the TEACH-AI study is to assess whether a brief, structured workshop on artificial intelligence can improve the performance of medicine doctors in training (i.e. residents) in their diagnostic and management reasoning. In this multi-site randomized controlled trial, internal medicine and family medicine residents are assigned either to receive an in-person workshop on safe, effective LLM use before a standardized AI-assisted assessment, or to complete the same assessment before receiving the workshop. Residents will review clinical cases that are fully synthetic, no protected health information is used, using a password protected LLM interface.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 24, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
September 25, 2026
September 1, 2026
3 months
August 10, 2026
September 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total Score on Expert-Development Rubrics
The primary outcome will be the number of correct responses for all cases using select questions from expert-developed scoring rubrics. The rubrics were developed using a Delphi consensus process by expert physicians as established by Goh et al (Nature Medicine, 2025; DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03456-y). The primary outcome will be analyzed at the case level, comparing performance between the randomized study groups, with a higher number of correct responses indicating a better outcome.
Within 24 hours of assessment completion.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Time Spent on Management
Within 24 hours of assessment completion.
Prompt Count
Within 24 hours of assessment completion.
Management Reasoning Using Expert-Derived Rubrics
Within 24 hours of assessment completion.
Diagnostic Reasoning
Within 24 hours of assessment completion.
Study Arms (2)
Assessment-First
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants assigned to this group will be tasked with completing the assessment using a password protected LLM interface first in advance of the workshop. The workshop will be delivered during a scheduled mandatory didactic time slot.
Workshop-first
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to this group will be tasked with completing the assessment using a password protected LLM interface after they participate in a scheduled mandatory didactic time slot.
Interventions
Participants will attend a workshop during their didactic time that will review various aspects of large language models including fundamentals and best practices of interacting and interpreting their outputs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be licensed physicians and have started at least post-graduate year 1 (PGY1) of medical training.
- Training in Internal medicine or family medicine or emergency medicine.
- Able to provide informed consent and complete assessments in English.
You may not qualify if:
- Not currently practicing clinically.
- Resident directly involved in the design of the study, development of the workshop, or creation/piloting of the assessment vignettes.
- Resident who declines or withdraws consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centerlead
- Stanford Universitycollaborator
- Cambridge Health Alliancecollaborator
- AdventHealthcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94305, United States
AdventHealth
Orlando, Florida, 32804, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Cambridge Health Alliance
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, United States
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The grading of responses will be performed by assessors blinded to participant identity and whether workshop-first or assessment-first assignment.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Instructor in Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2026
First Posted
September 10, 2026
Study Start
September 24, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
September 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share