NCT07767916

Brief Summary

The goal of this educational study is to determine whether personalized feedback generated using sensor data and generative artificial intelligence (AI) can improve the learning of standardized Tuina skills among rehabilitation trainees. Tuina is a form of manual therapy that requires learners to control the location, force, rhythm, and consistency of their hand movements. A total of 81 rehabilitation trainees will be randomly assigned to one of three training groups: AI-supported personalized feedback, sensor-based data feedback without AI-generated recommendations, or traditional instructor feedback. All groups will receive the same standardized demonstration, training tasks, practice duration, and number of practice sessions. The main question is whether trainees receiving AI-supported personalized feedback achieve better retention of standardized Tuina skills four weeks after training. The researchers will also compare immediate skill performance, force and rhythm control, transfer of skills to a related task, learning efficiency, self-efficacy, cognitive load, satisfaction, and the safety and acceptability of AI-generated feedback. Skill performance will be assessed using a blinded Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and objective sensor-based measurements. The study activities will be conducted using a mechanical simulation model and a pressure-sensing system, rather than on patients.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
81

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
22mo left

Started Aug 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress7%
Aug 2026Aug 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 12, 2026

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 13, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 17, 2026

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2027

Expected
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2028

Last Updated

August 17, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

August 12, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Artificial IntelligenceGenerative Artificial IntelligenceRehabilitation EducationHealth Professions EducationTuinaManual Therapy SkillsSensor-Based FeedbackPersonalized FeedbackDeliberate PracticeObjective Structured Clinical Examination

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Standardized Tuina Skill Performance Measured by Total OSCE Score

    Participants will complete a standardized Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) assessing anatomical localization, body mechanics, force control, rhythm, procedural consistency, safety, communication, and overall performance. Coded performance recordings will be independently scored by two assessors who are unaware of group allocation. The mean of the two assessors' total scores will be used for analysis. Higher scores indicate better standardized Tuina skill performance.

    Four weeks after completion of the training intervention

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Immediate Standardized Tuina Skill Performance Measured by Total OSCE Score

    Immediately after completion of the training intervention

  • Absolute Error From the Target Force

    Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention

  • Coefficient of Variation of Applied Force

    Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention

  • Absolute Error From the Target Operating Frequency

    Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention

  • Proportion of Practice Time Within the Target Performance Range

    Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

AI-Supported Personalized Feedback

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive standardized Tuina instruction and practice using a mechanical simulation model equipped with a pressure-sensing system. After each practice attempt, participants will receive objective sensor measurements and personalized, actionable feedback generated by a generative AI system under instructor supervision.

Behavioral: AI-Supported Personalized Feedback

Sensor-Based Data Feedback

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive the same standardized Tuina instruction, practice tasks, number of practice opportunities, and training duration as the experimental group. After each practice attempt, participants will receive sensor-generated numerical measurements, performance curves, and target ranges, without AI-generated interpretation or personalized recommendations.

Behavioral: Sensor-Based Data Feedback

Traditional Instructor Feedback

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive the same standardized Tuina instruction, practice tasks, number of practice opportunities, and training duration as the other groups. Feedback will be provided through conventional instructor observation and verbal guidance. Participants will not view sensor-generated performance data or AI-generated recommendations.

Behavioral: Traditional Instructor Feedback

Interventions

Participants will complete four standardized training sessions over two weeks, with each session lasting approximately 45 to 60 minutes. A pressure-sensing system will measure force accuracy, force variability, operating frequency, rhythm stability, and time within the target range. After each practice attempt, a generative AI system will provide feedback using a structured task-gap-action format. The feedback will describe the target task, identify differences between measured performance and the predefined standard, and recommend specific actions for the next practice attempt. AI output will be restricted to educational use and overseen by instructors.

AI-Supported Personalized Feedback

Participants will complete four standardized training sessions over two weeks, with each session lasting approximately 45 to 60 minutes. After each practice attempt, participants will view numerical sensor measurements, force-time curves, rhythm information, and predefined target ranges. No generative AI interpretation, personalized action plan, or AI-generated recommendation will be provided.

Sensor-Based Data Feedback

Participants will complete four standardized training sessions over two weeks, with each session lasting approximately 45 to 60 minutes. Instructors will observe performance and provide conventional verbal feedback based on the standardized teaching protocol. Participants will not receive sensor-derived performance displays or AI-generated feedback.

Traditional Instructor Feedback

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • Currently enrolled in or receiving training in rehabilitation medicine, physical therapy, rehabilitation therapy, or a related health profession.
  • Has not previously achieved the predefined competency standard for the standardized Tuina skill evaluated in this study.
  • Able to understand the study instructions and independently complete the training tasks and study questionnaires.
  • Able and willing to attend all scheduled training sessions and the four-week follow-up assessment.
  • Willing to participate voluntarily and provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Current acute injury, clinically significant pain, or functional limitation involving the hand, wrist, upper limb, shoulder, neck, or lower back that may interfere with repeated manual skill practice.
  • Previous systematic training in the same standardized Tuina technique with performance at or above the predefined competency standard.
  • Any medical, physical, cognitive, or psychological condition that, in the investigator's judgment, may make participation unsafe or prevent valid completion of the study procedures.
  • Unable to understand the study procedures or provide informed consent.
  • Direct involvement in the design, randomization, intervention delivery, outcome assessment, data management, or statistical analysis of this study.
  • Concurrent participation in another training study that may substantially affect performance of the standardized Tuina skill.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Officials

  • Xing-Chen Zhou

    The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Rd., Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Xing-Chen Zhou, Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants and instructors cannot be masked because of the nature of the educational interventions. OSCE performance recordings will be coded and independently evaluated by assessors who are unaware of group allocation and do not participate in intervention delivery. Group identities will be represented by coded labels during the primary statistical analysis.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three parallel educational intervention groups: AI-supported personalized feedback, sensor-based data feedback, or traditional instructor feedback. Participants will remain in their assigned group throughout the study, with no crossover between groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2026

First Posted

August 17, 2026

Study Start

August 13, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Last Updated

August 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the primary publication will be considered for sharing. The shared dataset may include participant demographic and educational characteristics, randomized group assignment, assessment time points, OSCE scores, derived sensor-based performance measures, questionnaire scores, and adverse event data. Direct identifiers, the participant identification key, facial images, audio recordings, raw performance videos, identifiable free-text responses, and raw AI interaction logs will not be shared.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Beginning 12 months after publication of the primary study results and remaining available for five years.
Access Criteria
Data will be available to qualified researchers who submit a methodologically sound research proposal. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator and the responsible institutional research team. Approved requesters must sign a data use agreement, use the data only for the approved purpose, protect participant confidentiality, and agree not to attempt participant re-identification. Additional ethics approval may be required depending on the proposed use and applicable institutional policies.