NCT07393724

Brief Summary

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of CBL compared to traditional lecture-demonstration methods in enhancing the foundational knowledge and practical tooth reduction skills of dental students in fixed prosthodontics. Participants were assigned to an experimental group (n=30) receiving four weekly 90-minute CBL sessions and a control group (n=30) receiving traditional lectures and clinical demonstrations

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 30, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2025

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 23, 2026

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 6, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 23, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Theoretical knowledge examination score

    Students' theoretical knowledge in teeth preparation in fixed prsothdontics was assessed using scores obtained from a structured written theoretical examination (score range: 0-10), where higher scores indicate better theoretical knowledge. The examination was conducted as part of the course assessment.

    At the end of the educational intervention (up to 4 weeks)

Study Arms (2)

Conventional teaching group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants received conventional teaching methods as part of the standard fixed prosthodontics curriculum.

Behavioral: Conventional Teaching

Case-Based Learning (CBL) group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received a case-based learning (CBL) educational intervention in fixed prosthodontics.

Behavioral: Case-Based Learning (CBL)

Interventions

A structured case-based learning approach was used to support active learning, clinical reasoning, and application of theoretical knowledge during fixed prosthodontics teaching sessions.

Case-Based Learning (CBL) group

Traditional lecture-based teaching delivered as part of the standard fixed prosthodontics curriculum.

Conventional teaching group

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 24 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Undergraduate preclinical dental students enrolled in the fixed prosthodontics course.
  • Students who agreed to participate and provided informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Students who had previously received formal training in case-based learning (CBL) methodology.
  • Students with more than 25% absence rate in regular prosthodontics classes.
  • Students who had previously failed the fixed prosthodontics course.
  • Individuals with physical limitations that might affect their performance in practical assessments.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Moaz EltoRKY

Tanta, Egypt

Location

Study Officials

  • moaz MO osama ahmed, PHD

    Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
This was an open-label educational study with no masking.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were assigned to either an educational intervention group or a control group receiving conventional teaching.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2026

First Posted

February 6, 2026

Study Start

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion

August 30, 2025

Study Completion

December 30, 2025

Last Updated

February 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations