Reliability In Neurocognitive Telemedicine Screening (RING)
1 other identifier
observational
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Perioperative neurocognitive disorders are common after surgery and pre-existing cognitive impairment is an important risk factor. Current guidelines recommend identifying cognitive impairment before surgery; however, screening remains inconsistent, particularly when preoperative assessments are performed remotely. This prospective observational diagnostic validation study aims to determine whether a modified Mini-Cog cognitive screening tool administered by telephone can reliably identify cognitive impairment in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing preoperative assessment. Telephone-based modified Mini-Cog results will be compared with standard in-person Mini-Cog assessments to evaluate agreement and feasibility. This study may improve access to preoperative cognitive screening and support optimization of surgical care for older adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2027
August 12, 2026
August 1, 2026
3.7 years
August 7, 2026
August 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Concordance between telephone-administered modified Mini-Cog and standard in-person Mini-Cog assessment
Agreement between modified Mini-Cog scores obtained by telephone and standard in-person Mini-Cog scores in identifying cognitive impairment using the established Mini-Cog cutoff score.
Within 1-2 weeks of telephone assessment
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sensitivity and specificity of telephone modified Mini-Cog
Within 1-2 weeks of telephone assessment
Completion time of modified Mini-Cog assessment
During each assessment
Feasibility of telephone-based cognitive screening
During telephone assessment
Interventions
A modified Mini-Cog cognitive screening assessment administered by telephone to evaluate its reliability and concordance with standard in-person Mini-Cog assessment in older adults undergoing preoperative assessment.
Eligibility Criteria
This study will include adults aged 65 years and older who are scheduled for elective surgery and undergoing preoperative anesthetic assessment at Vancouver General Hospital or University of British Columbia Hospital. Participants will be recruited from the Pre-Admission Clinic referral list and will complete a modified Mini-Cog cognitive screening assessment by telephone followed by a standard in-person Mini-Cog assessment during their preoperative visit. The study population represents older adults undergoing surgical evaluation who do not have a known diagnosis of cognitive impairment.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with age \>65 at time of listing for pre-operative assessment.
- Patients with a conversational understanding of English language.
- Patients scheduled for in-person consult with an anaesthesiologist.
- Patients awaiting surgery at Vancouver General Hospital or University of British Columbia Hospital.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Patients with known cognitive impairment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of British Columbialead
- Vancouver General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
Related Publications (13)
R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
BACKGROUNDRotondi MA (2018). _kappaSize: Sample Size Estimation Functions for Studies of Interobserver Agreement_. R package version 1.2, <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=kappaSize>.
BACKGROUNDGraham JE, Rockwood K, Beattie BL, Eastwood R, Gauthier S, Tuokko H, McDowell I. Prevalence and severity of cognitive impairment with and without dementia in an elderly population. Lancet. 1997 Jun 21;349(9068):1793-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01007-6.
PMID: 9269213BACKGROUNDDonner A, Rotondi MA. Sample size requirements for interval estimation of the kappa statistic for interobserver agreement studies with a binary outcome and multiple raters. Int J Biostat. 2010;6(1):Article 31. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1275.
PMID: 21969984BACKGROUNDRezaei M, Rashedi V, Lotfi G, Shirinbayan P, Foroughan M. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Adaptation of Mini-Cog Test in Iranian Older Adults. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2018 Apr;86(3):266-280. doi: 10.1177/0091415017724547. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
PMID: 28859488BACKGROUNDTiwary N, Treggiari MM, Yanez ND, Kirsch JR, Tekkali P, Taylor CC, Schenning KJ. Agreement Between the Mini-Cog in the Preoperative Clinic and on the Day of Surgery and Association With Postanesthesia Care Unit Delirium: A Cohort Study of Cognitive Screening in Older Adults. Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):1112-1119. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005197.
PMID: 33002933BACKGROUNDAdhikari SP, Dev R, Borson S. Modifying the Mini-Cog to Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Nonliterate Individuals. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2021 Aug 16;2021:5510093. doi: 10.1155/2021/5510093. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34447592BACKGROUNDWong DT, Kamming D, Salenieks ME, Go K, Kohm C, Chung F. Preadmission anesthesia consultation using telemedicine technology: a pilot study. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1605-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00038. No abstract available.
PMID: 15166585BACKGROUNDCulley DJ, Flaherty D, Fahey MC, Rudolph JL, Javedan H, Huang CC, Wright J, Bader AM, Hyman BT, Blacker D, Crosby G. Poor Performance on a Preoperative Cognitive Screening Test Predicts Postoperative Complications in Older Orthopedic Surgical Patients. Anesthesiology. 2017 Nov;127(5):765-774. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001859.
PMID: 28891828BACKGROUNDDecker J, Kaloostian CL, Gurvich T, Nguyen P, Widjaja W, Cardona H, Pagan V, Motamed A, Peden CJ. Beyond Cognitive Screening: Establishing an Interprofessional Perioperative Brain Health Initiative. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct;68(10):2359-2364. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16720. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
PMID: 32748487BACKGROUNDLong LS, Shapiro WA, Leung JM. A brief review of practical preoperative cognitive screening tools. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;59(8):798-804. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9737-1. Epub 2012 May 26.
PMID: 22638676BACKGROUNDMohanty S, Rosenthal RA, Russell MM, Neuman MD, Ko CY, Esnaola NF. Optimal Perioperative Management of the Geriatric Patient: A Best Practices Guideline from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):930-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.026. Epub 2016 Jan 4. No abstract available.
PMID: 27049783BACKGROUNDDworkin A, Lee DS, An AR, Goodlin SJ. A Simple Tool to Predict Development of Delirium After Elective Surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):e149-e153. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14428. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
PMID: 27650453BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Stewart Brown, MD
University of British Columbia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2026
First Posted
August 12, 2026
Study Start
May 2, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 30, 2027
Last Updated
August 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared. Data will be stored securely and access will be limited to authorized study personnel in accordance with institutional policies and ethical requirements.