NCT07754552

Brief Summary

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently affects the hand and wrist, resulting in pain, reduced joint stability, impaired proprioception, muscle weakness, and limitations in daily activities. Although conventional rehabilitation primarily focuses on range of motion and strengthening exercises, sensorimotor impairments such as proprioceptive deficits are often underaddressed. The SMART-HAND (Sensory, Massage, Approximation, ROM, Training = Strengthening + Perturbation) protocol was developed as a structured, mechanism-based rehabilitation program to improve proprioception, joint stability, motor control, and hand function. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the SMART-HAND protocol in individuals with RA by comparing its effects on hand function, proprioception, pain, dexterity, muscle strength, and functional performance with conventional rehabilitation and a control group.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
132

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable rheumatoid-arthritis

Timeline
15mo left

Started Oct 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable rheumatoid-arthritis

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 5, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 10, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2026

Expected
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 28, 2027

2 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2027

Last Updated

August 10, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

August 5, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 7, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Rheumatoid ArthritisHand RehabilitationHand FunctionProprioceptionNeuromuscular ControlGrip StrengthJoint Stability

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)

    The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) will be used to assess hand function, activities of daily living, pain, work performance, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction. The primary endpoint is the change in the total MHQ score from baseline to Week 12.

    Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 (Primary endpoint: change from baseline to Week 12)

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Joint Position Sense (Proprioception)

    Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12

  • Nine-Hole Peg Test

    Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12

  • Duruöz Hand Index

    Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12

  • Pain Intensity

    Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12

  • Sensory Threshold

    Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

SMART-HAND Protocol

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants assigned to the SMART-HAND Protocol Group will receive a supervised 12-week hand rehabilitation program consisting of two 50-minute sessions per week (24 sessions in total). The SMART-HAND protocol includes massage, sensory training, joint approximation, range of motion exercises, stretching, strengthening exercises, and perturbation-based stabilization training. Exercise progression will be individualized according to participants' tolerance using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale and progressive resistance. The intervention is designed to improve proprioception, sensorimotor integration, dynamic joint stability, muscle strength, and hand function.

Behavioral: SMART-HAND Protocol

Conventional Hand Rehabilitation Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants assigned to the Conventional Hand Rehabilitation Group will receive a supervised 12-week conventional hand exercise program consisting of two 50-minute sessions per week (24 sessions in total). The program includes range of motion, stretching, and strengthening exercises. Exercise intensity and progression will be individualized according to participants' tolerance using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale and progressive resistance. The intervention primarily aims to improve joint mobility, muscle strength, and hand function.

Behavioral: Conventional Hand Rehabilitation

Usual Care + Education Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants assigned to the Usual Care + Education Group will continue to receive their routine medical care and will attend a single educational session lasting approximately 20-30 minutes. The education will include joint protection principles, ergonomic recommendations, and strategies for performing activities of daily living. No supervised exercise program will be provided during the 12-week study period.

Behavioral: SMART-HAND ProtocolBehavioral: Joint Protection and Ergonomic Education

Interventions

The SMART-HAND Protocol is a supervised, mechanism-based hand rehabilitation program administered twice weekly for 12 weeks (24 sessions, 50 minutes per session). The protocol consists of sensory training, massage, joint approximation, range of motion exercises, stretching, strengthening exercises, and perturbation-based stabilization training. Exercise progression is individualized according to participants' tolerance using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale and progressive resistance. The intervention is designed to improve proprioception, sensorimotor control, joint stability, muscle strength, and hand function.

SMART-HAND ProtocolUsual Care + Education Group

Participants will receive a supervised conventional hand rehabilitation program twice weekly for 12 weeks (24 sessions, 50 minutes per session). The program includes range of motion, stretching, and strengthening exercises. Exercise intensity and progression will be individualized according to participants' tolerance using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale and progressive resistance.

Conventional Hand Rehabilitation Group

Participants will receive a single face-to-face education session lasting approximately 20-30 minutes. The education will include information on joint protection techniques, ergonomic principles, energy conservation, and recommendations for performing activities of daily living. Participants will continue their routine medical care throughout the study but will not receive a supervised exercise program.

Usual Care + Education Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants will consist of individuals aged 18 years and older who have been diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis at least five years prior to enrollment and referred by a rheumatologist. Eligible participants must have been on a stable medication regimen for the past three months, have no history of diabetes or other conditions affecting sensory function, and provide informed consent to participate.

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals who have undergone hand surgery within the past six months, have a history of upper extremity fracture within the last six months, or have other pain conditions involving muscles and/or joints will be excluded. Additionally, individuals diagnosed with a neurological disease that may affect sensory or motor function, those unable to fully cooperate with the assessment procedures, those who have received corticosteroid treatment within the past month, those diagnosed with another rheumatic disease, pregnant women, and individuals who are illiterate will not be included in the study.
  • Furthermore, participants who miss more than 10% of the intervention sessions or who change their medication dosage or class during the study period will be excluded. Participants will have the right to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (14)

  • Chua M, Seth I, Rozen WM. The reliability and applicability of the Ten Test in hand injuries: A systematic review. Hand Ther. 2024 Jun;29(2):44-51. doi: 10.1177/17589983241230249. Epub 2024 Jan 28.

  • Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of sensibility after nerve injury and repair: a systematic review of evidence for validity, reliability and responsiveness of tests. J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Jun;30(3):252-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.12.006.

  • Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing Proprioception: A Systematic Review of Possibilities. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(10):933-49. doi: 10.1177/1545968315573055. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

  • Lewis E, Fors L, Tharion WJ. Interrater and intrarater reliability of finger goniometric measurements. Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Jul-Aug;64(4):555-61. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09028.

  • Carter TI, Pansy B, Wolff AL, Hillstrom HJ, Backus SI, Lenhoff M, Wolfe SW. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Oct;34(8):1422-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Aug 22.

  • Hamilton GF, McDonald C, Chenier TC. Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16(5):215-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.16.5.215.

  • Oxford Grice K, Vogel KA, Le V, Mitchell A, Muniz S, Vollmer MA. Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 2003 Sep-Oct;57(5):570-3. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.570.

  • Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8.

  • Oksuz C, Akel BS, Oskay D, Leblebicioglu G, Hayran KM. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability process of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in a Turkish population. J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Mar;36(3):486-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.016. Epub 2011 Feb 4.

  • Duruoz MT, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, Menkes CJ, Amor B, Dougados M, Revel M. Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. J Rheumatol. 1996 Jul;23(7):1167-72.

  • Riemann BL, Lephart SM. The sensorimotor system, part I: the physiologic basis of functional joint stability. J Athl Train. 2002 Jan;37(1):71-9.

  • Roijezon U, Clark NC, Treleaven J. Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 1: Basic science and principles of assessment and clinical interventions. Man Ther. 2015 Jun;20(3):368-77. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

  • Young A, Dixey J, Cox N, Davies P, Devlin J, Emery P, Gallivan S, Gough A, James D, Prouse P, Williams P, Winfield J. How does functional disability in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affect patients and their lives? Results of 5 years of follow-up in 732 patients from the Early RA Study (ERAS). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Jun;39(6):603-11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.6.603.

  • Shauver MJ, Chung KC. The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Mar;34(3):509-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.001.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Busra Turk, PT, MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome assessments will be performed by an independent assessor who will be blinded to group allocation. Statistical analyses will be conducted by an independent statistician blinded to treatment allocation. Participants and treating physiotherapists cannot be blinded because of the nature of the interventions.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three parallel groups: (1) the SMART-HAND protocol group, (2) the conventional hand rehabilitation group, or (3) the control group. The intervention will be administered for 12 weeks, and outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and at the end of the intervention.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Student, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2026

First Posted

August 10, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 28, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Last Updated

August 10, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available. Data will be retained by the investigators in accordance with institutional policies and ethical approval, and no current plan exists for external data sharing.