NCT07753707

Brief Summary

Influence of different tibial fixation methods in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: bone integration, graft maturation, and clinical outcomes. Primary Objective To assess whether any of the four tibial fixation techniques is superior in terms of: Graft-bone integration (CT/MRI), Graft maturation (MRI), Clinical outcomes (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner scores; manual and instrumented knee stability with KT-1000 arthrometer). Secondary Objectives Compare clinical outcomes among groups (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner). Compare re-rupture rates and patient satisfaction. Study Design Prospective randomized trial. The study will be registered in the international Clinical Trials registry. Inclusion Criteria Age ≥18 years. Complete ACL rupture treated with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons. Exclusion Criteria Age ≥55 years. Patients treated with allografts, bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts, or quadriceps tendon grafts. Malpositioned tunnels (evaluated by MRI at 6 months postop). Previous knee surgery. Femoral or tibial deformities. Multiligament injuries. Note: Soft tissue procedures (e.g., meniscal repair) are not exclusion criteria. Randomization Patients meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized (via Research Randomizer: https://www.randomizer.org/ ) into 3 groups: Group A (TORN): bioabsorbable interference screw, same diameter as the tunnel. Group B (TORN+1): bioabsorbable interference screw, one mm larger than the tunnel diameter. Group C (TORN-BT): interference screw (same size as tunnel) + second fixation with cortical button/plate. Sample size: 37 patients per group, 111 total. Follow-up Radiographic, CT, and MRI evaluation pre-op, at 15 days, and at 1 year post-op. Clinical and radiological follow-up for 1 year. Statistical Analysis In the prospective phase, Student's t-test will be performed for comparison of pre- and postoperative variables. All variables will also be compared between groups and within groups (baseline vs. end of follow-up) using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Linear regression models will be applied to test for potential significance that could be masked by confounding factors.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
111

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Jan 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress94%
Jan 2023Dec 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 7, 2023

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 30, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

August 7, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

September 30, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 4, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • ACL Graft-bone integration (CT/MRI)

    Graft-bone integration assessed by CT or MRI according to tunnel healing and bone incorporation.

    12 months

  • Graft maturation (MRI)

    Graft maturation assessed on MRI using the Signal-to-Noise Quotient (SNQ).

    6-12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Score

    12 months

  • Tegner Activity Scale

    12 months

  • Side-to-side anterior knee laxity measured with KT-1000 arthrometer

    12 months

Study Arms (3)

Group A (TORN): tibial graft fixation bioabsorbable interference screw, same diameter as the tunnel.

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction

Group B (TORN+1): bioabsorbable interference screw, one mm larger than the tunnel diameter.

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction

Group C (TORN-BT): interference screw (same size as tunnel) + second fixation with cortical button

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction

Interventions

The three different types of tibial fixation in ACL reconstruction with Hamstring autograft: Group A (TORN): bioabsorbable interference screw, same diameter as the tunnel. Group B (TORN+1): bioabsorbable interference screw, one mm larger than the tunnel diameter. Group C (TORN-BT): interference screw (same size as tunnel) + second fixation with cortical button/plate.

Group A (TORN): tibial graft fixation bioabsorbable interference screw, same diameter as the tunnel.Group B (TORN+1): bioabsorbable interference screw, one mm larger than the tunnel diameter.Group C (TORN-BT): interference screw (same size as tunnel) + second fixation with cortical button

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Complete ACL rupture treated with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons.

You may not qualify if:

  • Age ≥55 years.
  • Patients treated with allografts, bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts, or quadriceps tendon grafts.
  • Malpositioned tunnels (evaluated by MRI at 6 months postop).
  • Previous knee surgery.
  • Femoral or tibial deformities.
  • Multiligament injuries.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Universitario Dexeus

Barcelona, BARCELONA, 08028, Spain

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Mathew M, Dhollander A, Getgood A. Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Extra-Articular Tenodesis: Why and When? Clin Sports Med. 2018 Jan;37(1):75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

    PMID: 29173559BACKGROUND
  • Granan LP, Bahr R, Steindal K, Furnes O, Engebretsen L. Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):308-15. doi: 10.1177/0363546507308939. Epub 2007 Nov 7.

    PMID: 17989167BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Interventions

Plastic Surgery Procedures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Knee InjuriesLeg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical Procedures, Operative

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2025

First Posted

August 7, 2026

Study Start

January 7, 2023

Primary Completion

January 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

August 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Locations