Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration in ACL Reconstruction Comparing Tightrope vs Interference Screw Fixation
1 other identifier
interventional
37
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of our study was to compare osseous integration of the bone block in Achilles tendon allograft ACL reconstruction using a cortical button versus biocomposite interference screw fixation. The primary outcome was bone block incorporation within the femoral tunnel at six months. Our null hypothesis was that there is no difference in osseous incorporation or outcome with either type of femoral fixation in primary ACL reconstruction with Achilles tendon allograft. Our secondary outcomes were pain and clinical outcome scores between the two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2019
CompletedFebruary 15, 2019
February 1, 2019
1 year
February 7, 2019
February 14, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Femoral Ossification Score
Amount of ossification (osseous integration) around the graft at 6 months post-operatively as seen on CT scan. Score range: 0 (minimum) - 5 (maximum). Score of 0 is the worst outcome and indicates no ossification in the femoral tunnel as seen on CT scan. Score of 5 indicates full ossification of the tunnel (best outcome) as seen on CT scan. Scores in between indicate partial ossification (each number 20% more ossification than the previous score).
6 months post-op
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain (VAS)
Obtained preoperatively (right before surgery); 2 weeks after surgery; and 6 months after surgery
Knee range of motion
Obtained preoperatively (right before surgery) and at 6 months after surgery
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score
Obtained preoperatively (right before surgery) and at 6 months after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Aperture (biocomposite screw) fixation
ACTIVE COMPARATOR16 patients in this arm underwent ACL reconstruction with the allograft fixed in the femoral tunnel with a biocomposite interference screw (BioComposite Screw, Arthrex, North Naples, FL; or MILAGRO screw, DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA, USA). Intervention: ACL reconstruction with the allograft fixed in the femoral tunnel with a biocomposite interference screw.
Suspensory (endobutton) fixation
ACTIVE COMPARATOR17 patients in this arm underwent ACL reconstruction with the allograft secured in the femoral tunnel with a cortical button (TightRope, Arthrex, North Naples, FL, USA). Intervention: ACL reconstruction with the allograft secured in the femoral tunnel with a cortical button.
Interventions
ACL reconstruction using biocomposite intereference screw for femoral tunnel fixation
ACL reconstruction using endobutton (Tightrope) for femoral tunnel fixation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients between the ages of 18 and 50 able to provide informed consent with ACL tears meeting the indications for reconstruction and electing to undergo reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft.
You may not qualify if:
- History of prior ACL reconstruction
- pregnancy
- inflammatory disease
- a primary bone disorder
- those taking bone resorption inhibitor medications
- those with injuries to the collateral ligaments or posterior cruciate ligament
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kelsey-Seybold Cliniclead
- Baylor College of Medicinecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kelsey-Seybold Clinic
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anup Shah
Kelsey-Seybold Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2019
First Posted
February 15, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data is already available (study has been completed)
- Access Criteria
- Standard
Primary and secondary outcome measures (de-identified)