Listen Aphasia Pilot Study
LISTEN
LISTEN: Supporting Communication in Patients With Tumor-Related Aphasia
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a feasibility and pilot study to refine and test LISTEN, an AI-based augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) smartphone app, integrated into the patient's personal electronic device, to augment and facilitate communication in patients with tumor-related aphasia (TRA) and their care partners. The study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of LISTEN in patients with TRA and their care partners.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2027
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2030
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2030
July 28, 2026
July 1, 2026
3.3 years
July 23, 2026
July 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Usability of LISTEN Assessed by the System Usability Scale (SUS) [Phase 1]
Usability of the LISTEN prototype will be evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) in patients with treatment-resistant anxiety (TRA) and their care partners. Participants will engage in think-aloud usability testing during daily communication scenarios, followed by completion of the SUS questionnaire after each session. The primary outcome is defined as a mean SUS score ≥70 across all participants, indicating acceptable usability.
Up to 12 months (Phase 1 refinement period).
Acceptability of LISTEN Assessed by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) [Phase 2]
Acceptability of the LISTEN application will be evaluated using the AIM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess participants' perceived acceptability of the intervention in real-world settings; the outcome is defined as a mean AIM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable acceptability.
Up to 24 months (pre-pilot study period).
Appropriateness of LISTEN Assessed by Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) [Phase 2]
Appropriateness of the LISTEN application will be evaluated using the IAM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess the perceived fit, relevance, and suitability of the intervention for the target population and context; the outcome is defined as a mean IAM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable appropriateness.
Up to 24 months (pre-pilot study period).
Feasibility of LISTEN Assessed by Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) [Phase 2]
Feasibility of the LISTEN application will be evaluated using the FIM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess the extent to which the intervention can be successfully used and implemented in real-world settings; the outcome is defined as a mean FIM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable feasibility.
Up to 24 months (pre-pilot study period).
Acceptability of LISTEN Assessed by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) [Phase 3]
Acceptability of the LISTEN application will be evaluated of using AIM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess participants' perceived acceptability of the intervention in real-world settings; participants will engage in a three-stage intervention (preparation, training, and testing at 4-week intervals), and the outcome is defined as a mean AIM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable acceptability.
At the end of the open pilot study (up to 48 months).
Appropriateness of LISTEN Assessed by Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) [Phase 3]
Appropriateness of the LISTEN application will be evaluated using IAM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess the perceived fit, relevance, and suitability of the intervention for the target population and context; participants will engage in a three-stage intervention (preparation, training, and testing at 4-week intervals), and the outcome is defined as a mean IAM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable appropriateness.
At the end of the open pilot study (up to 48 months).
Feasibility of LISTEN Assessed by Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) [Phase 3]
Feasibility of the LISTEN application will be evaluated using FIM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess the extent to which the intervention can be successfully used and implemented in real-world settings; participants will engage in a three-stage intervention (preparation, training, and testing at 4-week intervals), and the outcome is defined as a mean FIM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable feasibility.
At the end of the open pilot study (up to 48 months).
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Sustained Use of LISTEN at 12 Weeks
At 12 weeks following intervention initiation.
Session Duration of LISTEN Use
During participant use throughout the study period (up to 48 months).
Task Completion Rate of LISTEN
During participant use throughout the study period (up to 48 months).
Error Rate During LISTEN Use
During participant use throughout the study period (up to 48 months).
Qualitative Usability Themes Identified From Think-Aloud Protocols and Exit Interviews
At the end of each session and throughout the study period (up to 48 months).
Study Arms (3)
Arm 1
OTHERRefinement Phase - 10 patient-care-partner dyads (20 participants) will use the LISTEN prototype in a single session for usability testing.
Arm 2
OTHERPre-pilot Phase - 10 patient-care-partner dyads (20 participants) will use LISTEN in real-world scenarios for iterative refinement.
Arm 3
OTHEROpen Pilot Phase - 20 patient-care-partner dyads (40 participants) will use LISTEN for up to 16 weeks to assess feasibility and acceptability.
Interventions
LISTEN is a smartphone app leveraging AI and large language models (LLMs) to support personalized, adaptive communication for individuals with tumor-related aphasia. The app is customized with user-specific information and deployed through mobile applications with voice input/output capabilities.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A histologically or cytologically confirmed primary or secondary brain tumor with expected ongoing deterioration in language as determined by their oncologist
- Mild-to-moderate aphasia or other acquired communication disorder as determined by their oncologist or speech-language pathologist
- ECOG Performance Status of ≤2 or Karnofsky Performance Status ≥60
- Expected overall survival of \>6 months
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written consent form
- Age ≥18 years
- Willingness to participate in study interviews and be recorded for the study (for monitoring of study fidelity)
- Cancer survivors will also be included
- Identified by their patient as someone who is integral to their care
- Age ≥18 years
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written consent form
- Willingness to participate in study interviews and be recorded for the study (monitoring of study fidelity)
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to read or respond to questions in English
- Severe dysarthria as determined by their oncologist
- Aphasia that is moderate-to-sever enough that the patient cannot consent without a proxy
- Expected survival of ≤ 6 months
- Severe cognitive impairment as determined by their oncologist
- Unable to read or respond to questions in English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Brigham & Woman's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Rhee, MD, MPH
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2026
First Posted
July 28, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2030
Last Updated
July 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication.
- Access Criteria
- Contact the Belfer Office for Dana-Farber Innovations (BODFI) at innovation@dfci.harvard.edu
The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: \[contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee\]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.