NCT07732140

Brief Summary

This is a feasibility and pilot study to refine and test LISTEN, an AI-based augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) smartphone app, integrated into the patient's personal electronic device, to augment and facilitate communication in patients with tumor-related aphasia (TRA) and their care partners. The study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of LISTEN in patients with TRA and their care partners.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
48mo left

Started Jan 2027

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 23, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 28, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2027

Expected
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2030

7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2030

Last Updated

July 28, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

July 23, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Tumor-Related Aphasia (TRA)Malignant Brain Tumor

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Usability of LISTEN Assessed by the System Usability Scale (SUS) [Phase 1]

    Usability of the LISTEN prototype will be evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) in patients with treatment-resistant anxiety (TRA) and their care partners. Participants will engage in think-aloud usability testing during daily communication scenarios, followed by completion of the SUS questionnaire after each session. The primary outcome is defined as a mean SUS score ≥70 across all participants, indicating acceptable usability.

    Up to 12 months (Phase 1 refinement period).

  • Acceptability of LISTEN Assessed by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) [Phase 2]

    Acceptability of the LISTEN application will be evaluated using the AIM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess participants' perceived acceptability of the intervention in real-world settings; the outcome is defined as a mean AIM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable acceptability.

    Up to 24 months (pre-pilot study period).

  • Appropriateness of LISTEN Assessed by Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) [Phase 2]

    Appropriateness of the LISTEN application will be evaluated using the IAM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess the perceived fit, relevance, and suitability of the intervention for the target population and context; the outcome is defined as a mean IAM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable appropriateness.

    Up to 24 months (pre-pilot study period).

  • Feasibility of LISTEN Assessed by Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) [Phase 2]

    Feasibility of the LISTEN application will be evaluated using the FIM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess the extent to which the intervention can be successfully used and implemented in real-world settings; the outcome is defined as a mean FIM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable feasibility.

    Up to 24 months (pre-pilot study period).

  • Acceptability of LISTEN Assessed by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) [Phase 3]

    Acceptability of the LISTEN application will be evaluated of using AIM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess participants' perceived acceptability of the intervention in real-world settings; participants will engage in a three-stage intervention (preparation, training, and testing at 4-week intervals), and the outcome is defined as a mean AIM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable acceptability.

    At the end of the open pilot study (up to 48 months).

  • Appropriateness of LISTEN Assessed by Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) [Phase 3]

    Appropriateness of the LISTEN application will be evaluated using IAM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess the perceived fit, relevance, and suitability of the intervention for the target population and context; participants will engage in a three-stage intervention (preparation, training, and testing at 4-week intervals), and the outcome is defined as a mean IAM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable appropriateness.

    At the end of the open pilot study (up to 48 months).

  • Feasibility of LISTEN Assessed by Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) [Phase 3]

    Feasibility of the LISTEN application will be evaluated using FIM developed by Weiner et al. (2017) to assess the extent to which the intervention can be successfully used and implemented in real-world settings; participants will engage in a three-stage intervention (preparation, training, and testing at 4-week intervals), and the outcome is defined as a mean FIM score ≥4 across all participants based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree), indicating favorable feasibility.

    At the end of the open pilot study (up to 48 months).

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Sustained Use of LISTEN at 12 Weeks

    At 12 weeks following intervention initiation.

  • Session Duration of LISTEN Use

    During participant use throughout the study period (up to 48 months).

  • Task Completion Rate of LISTEN

    During participant use throughout the study period (up to 48 months).

  • Error Rate During LISTEN Use

    During participant use throughout the study period (up to 48 months).

  • Qualitative Usability Themes Identified From Think-Aloud Protocols and Exit Interviews

    At the end of each session and throughout the study period (up to 48 months).

Study Arms (3)

Arm 1

OTHER

Refinement Phase - 10 patient-care-partner dyads (20 participants) will use the LISTEN prototype in a single session for usability testing.

Device: LISTEN (AI-based AAC smartphone app)

Arm 2

OTHER

Pre-pilot Phase - 10 patient-care-partner dyads (20 participants) will use LISTEN in real-world scenarios for iterative refinement.

Device: LISTEN (AI-based AAC smartphone app)

Arm 3

OTHER

Open Pilot Phase - 20 patient-care-partner dyads (40 participants) will use LISTEN for up to 16 weeks to assess feasibility and acceptability.

Device: LISTEN (AI-based AAC smartphone app)

Interventions

LISTEN is a smartphone app leveraging AI and large language models (LLMs) to support personalized, adaptive communication for individuals with tumor-related aphasia. The app is customized with user-specific information and deployed through mobile applications with voice input/output capabilities.

Arm 1Arm 2Arm 3

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • A histologically or cytologically confirmed primary or secondary brain tumor with expected ongoing deterioration in language as determined by their oncologist
  • Mild-to-moderate aphasia or other acquired communication disorder as determined by their oncologist or speech-language pathologist
  • ECOG Performance Status of ≤2 or Karnofsky Performance Status ≥60
  • Expected overall survival of \>6 months
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written consent form
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Willingness to participate in study interviews and be recorded for the study (for monitoring of study fidelity)
  • Cancer survivors will also be included
  • Identified by their patient as someone who is integral to their care
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written consent form
  • Willingness to participate in study interviews and be recorded for the study (monitoring of study fidelity)

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to read or respond to questions in English
  • Severe dysarthria as determined by their oncologist
  • Aphasia that is moderate-to-sever enough that the patient cannot consent without a proxy
  • Expected survival of ≤ 6 months
  • Severe cognitive impairment as determined by their oncologist
  • Unable to read or respond to questions in English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Brigham & Woman's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Dana-Farber Cancer Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AphasiaBrain Neoplasms

Interventions

Auscultation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Speech DisordersLanguage DisordersCommunication DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsNervous System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physical ExaminationDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Study Officials

  • John Rhee, MD, MPH

    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2026

First Posted

July 28, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Last Updated

July 28, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: \[contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee\]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication.
Access Criteria
Contact the Belfer Office for Dana-Farber Innovations (BODFI) at innovation@dfci.harvard.edu

Locations