NCT07725003

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the effects of telerehabilitation based motor relearning program and telerehabilitation based conventional physical therapy on motor function and balance in stroke patients.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
0mo left

Started Jun 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress99%
Jun 2025Aug 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 5, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 21, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2026

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 6, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 6, 2026

Last Updated

July 24, 2026

Status Verified

July 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

July 21, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Balance DisordersMotor Relearning ProgramStroke Telerehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) Motor Function Score

    Change in motor function will be assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA). The FMA evaluates motor recovery of the upper and lower extremities, with higher scores indicating better motor function.

    Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

  • Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Score

    Balance performance will be assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The scale consists of 14 functional balance tasks, with higher scores indicating better balance.

    Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test

    Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

Study Arms (2)

Telerehabilitation-Based Motor Relearning Program (MRP)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm will receive a structured Motor Relearning Program delivered through telerehabilitation via secure video conferencing. The intervention will consist of task-specific, goal-oriented exercises focusing on trunk control, balance, functional transfers, gait training, and coordination. Sessions will be conducted three times per week for six weeks, with each session lasting 45-60 minutes under the remote supervision of a physiotherapist.

Other: Telerehabilitation Based Motor Relearning Program

Telerehabilitation-Based Conventional Physical Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm will receive conventional physical therapy delivered through telerehabilitation via secure video conferencing. The intervention will include range-of-motion exercises, stretching, strengthening, balance training, gait exercises, and functional mobility activities. Sessions will be conducted three times per week for six weeks, with each session lasting 45-60 minutes under the remote supervision of a physiotherapist.

Other: Conventional physical therapy

Interventions

Participants will receive conventional physiotherapy through secure video conferencing under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The intervention will be provided 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks (18 sessions total). Each session will last 45-60 minutes, including a warm-up, exercise session, and cool-down. The program consists of active-assisted and active range-of-motion exercises, stretching, breathing exercises, strengthening exercises, weight-shifting activities, marching in place, gait training, dynamic mobility exercises, and light resistance exercises using Theraband where appropriate. Exercise intensity will be moderate and adjusted according to each participant's tolerance and clinical progress.

Also known as: Standard physical therapy
Telerehabilitation-Based Conventional Physical Therapy

Participants will receive a Motor Relearning Program (MRP) delivered through secure video conferencing under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The intervention will be provided 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks (18 sessions total). Each session will last 45-60 minutes, including a warm-up, task-specific functional training, and cool-down. Exercises include sitting and standing balance training, trunk control, sit-to-stand practice, upper limb reaching, trunk rotation, weight-shifting, step training, walking practice, stair simulation, obstacle negotiation, dual-task activities, community mobility simulation, and functional transfer training. Exercise intensity will be moderate and progressively increased according to the participant's tolerance and functional performance.

Also known as: MRP, Tas-Specific Motor Relearning, Telerehabilitation MRP
Telerehabilitation-Based Motor Relearning Program (MRP)

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female participants.
  • Diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke 3-12 months prior to enrollment.
  • Medically stable and cleared to participate in physical rehabilitation.
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥24.
  • Able to understand and follow verbal instructions.
  • Have access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer with a stable internet connection for telerehabilitation sessions.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of other neurological disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis).
  • Uncontrolled hypertension or recent cardiac event.
  • Severe visual, auditory, or communication impairments that prevent participation.
  • Currently enrolled in another structured rehabilitation program.
  • Any musculoskeletal or medical condition that would interfere with safe participation in the intervention.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aziz Fatimah Hospital

Faisalabad, Punjab Province, 38000, Pakistan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (8)

  • Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4.

    PMID: 27145936BACKGROUND
  • Ghrouz A, Marco E, Munoz-Redondo E, Boza R, Ramirez-Fuentes C, Duarte E. The effect of motor relearning on balance, mobility and performance of activities of daily living among post-stroke patients: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Eur Stroke J. 2022 Mar;7(1):76-84. doi: 10.1177/23969873211061027. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

    PMID: 35300258BACKGROUND
  • Khallaf ME. Effect of Task-Specific Training on Trunk Control and Balance in Patients with Subacute Stroke. Neurol Res Int. 2020 Nov 17;2020:5090193. doi: 10.1155/2020/5090193. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 33294224BACKGROUND
  • Chen J, Jin W, Zhang XX, Xu W, Liu XN, Ren CC. Telerehabilitation Approaches for Stroke Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Dec;24(12):2660-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

    PMID: 26483155BACKGROUND
  • Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, Zhou RJ, Chiu NL, Heckhausen J, Cassidy JM, Scacchi W, Smith MT, Barrett AM, Knutson J, Edwards D, Putrino D, Agrawal K, Ngo K, Roth EJ, Tirschwell DL, Woodbury ML, Zafonte R, Zhao W, Spilker J, Wolf SL, Broderick JP, Janis S; National Institutes of Health StrokeNet Telerehab Investigators. Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation vs In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):1079-1087. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604.

    PMID: 31233135BACKGROUND
  • Laver KE, Adey-Wakeling Z, Crotty M, Lannin NA, George S, Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 31;1(1):CD010255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3.

    PMID: 32002991BACKGROUND
  • Alwadai B, Lazem H, Almoajil H, Hall AJ, Mansoubi M, Dawes H. Telerehabilitation and Its Impact Following Stroke: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews. J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 26;14(1):50. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010050.

    PMID: 39797132BACKGROUND
  • Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins S, Sacco RL, Hacke W, Fisher M, Pandian J, Lindsay P. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. 2022 Jan;17(1):18-29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917.

    PMID: 34986727BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Misbah Waris, phd

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Blinding
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2026

First Posted

July 24, 2026

Study Start

June 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 6, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 6, 2026

Last Updated

July 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations