Comparative Effects of Motor Imagery and Mirror Therapy Versus Motor Relearning Program in Subacute Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Use of motor imagery, mirror therapy and motor relearning program in rehabilitation of people with stroke is on rise and these are unique and emerging techniques. Motor imagery is a mental rehearsal through visualization while mirror therapy creates a reflection of non-effected limb by using a mirror. Moreover, motor relearning is task-oriented approach, benefacial for balance and motor funCtion in patients with stroke that emphasizes on relearning.The aim of the study is to determine the comparative effects of motor imagery and mirror therapy versus motor relearning program in addition to routine physical therapy on balance, motor function and activities of daily living in subacute stroke patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedOctober 15, 2024
October 1, 2024
7 months
March 4, 2024
October 10, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Berg balance scale (BBS)
The BBS is postural balance scale containing 14 items including standing and sitting unsupported, reaching forward, and placing the alternating foot on a stool. Administering the BBS takes approximately 15 min. Each of the 14 items are scored on a 5-level ordinal scale from 0 ("unable to perform or requiring help") to 4 ("normal performance"), thus providing a potential maximum score of 56 points
12th week
FUGL-MEYER ASSESMENT (FMA)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is a welldesigned, feasible and efficient clinical examination method that has been tested widely in the stroke population. A three-level ordinal scale (0, can perform no part of the test; 1, performs test partially; 2, performs test normally) is applied to each item. A total possible score for the lower extremity is 34. The higher the score, the better the performance.
12th week
FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE (FIM)
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is one of the most frequently used outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation trials. The five FIM items dealing with transfers and locomotion, including transfers to bed/chair/wheelchair, toileting, bathing, walking or wheelchair management and stairs, were used in this pilot study to evaluate the activities of daily living in the patients with stroke. Each item is rated on a seven-level scale, with 1 = total assistance and 7 (complete independence). By adding the points for each item in the transfers and locomotion, the possible total score ranges from 5 (lowest) to 35 (highest) level of independence; the higher the score, the better the independence. This scale has good reliability for the assessment of recovery of function in stroke patients.
12th week
Study Arms (2)
GROUP A (MOTOR IMAGERY+MIRROR THERAPY+ROUTINE PHYSICAL THERAPY)
EXPERIMENTALGroup A will receive treatment session of 60 minutes including motor imagery for 20 minutes and mirror therapy for 20 minutes along with routine physical therapy of 20 minutes for 5 days per week for 12 weeks.In motor imagery subjects will watch the video and will be asked to close the eyes to focus and imagine how they are doing task they had previously observed 10 times and instructed to carry out the task in verbal commands given whenever necessary. In mirror therapy,The unaffected limb will be placed in front of the mirror and patient will try to make the identical motions with the paretic limb while moving the non-paretic limb during the session and routine physical therapy includes passive and active assisted range of motion for the upper and lower extremity including the shoulder, forearm, wrist, hip, knee and ankle will be given (10 - 15 repititions).
GROUP B (MOTOR RELEARNING PROGRAM+ROUTINE PHYSICAL THERAPY)
EXPERIMENTALGROUP B will receive treatment session of 60 minutes including motor relearning program of 40 minutes duration along with routine physical therapy of 20 minutes as explained in group A protocol. Treatment session will be given 5 days per week for 12 weeks. Motor relearning consists of five components including analysis of task, practice of missing components, practice of task and transference of training.
Interventions
Subjects will be instructed to watch the video provided and recorded by investigator.In next step participants will be asked to close the eyes to focus and then to imagine how they are doing task they had previously observed 10 times.Participants will be than instructed to carry out the task in verbal commands given whenever necessary.The unaffected limb will be placed in front of the mirror so that the reflected illusion of the limb would be hallucinated to represent the affected limb and routine physical therapy includes passive and active assisted range of motion for the upper and lower extremity including the shoulder, forearm, wrist, hip, knee and ankle will be given (10 - 15 repititions).
Motor relearning consists of five components including analysis of task, practice of missing components, practice of task and transference of training. Patient will be asked to practice task in both sitting and standing * supine to side-lying to sitting * looking up at ceiling (ensure that centre of body mass does not move back when head is tilted back) * without moving one's feet, turning to gaze over each other's shoulders and scanning the surroundings for specific items, reaching motions in multiple directions while moving the head and trunk, scooting in bed, altering the base of support (standing with your feet together, in tandem, with one foot on a step, or on one leg) * squatting to pick up an object and cross over stepping and routine physical therapy includes Passive and active assisted range of motion for the upper and lower extremity including the shoulder, forearm, wrist, hip, knee and ankle will be given (10 - 15 repititions).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stroke patient of both gender.
- Stroke patient of age 40-65 year .
- Patient diagnosis of cerebral ischemic stroke .
- Patients who had suffered a stroke with hemiplegia, were subacute at least 3 months to 5 months since the onset.
- Ability to walk with minimal assistance (functional ambulation category 1 to 3.
- Patient with score \> 25 on mini-mental status examination.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who presented with hemiplegic neglect or apraxia
- Patients with history of global or receptive aphasia
- Patients with history of psychological or emotional problems
- Patients with history of decompensated cardiovascular/ respiratory/ digestive/ renal disorders, biologic inflammatory syndrome, neoplastic disorders, neurogenic bladder or skin disorders (bedsores).
- Patients with history of artificial joints
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Muhammad Kashif
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54660, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Muhammad Kashif, PhD
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The study would be single blinded as assessor of the study would be kept blind of the treatment groups to which patient would be allocated.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2024
First Posted
March 13, 2024
Study Start
February 25, 2024
Primary Completion
September 30, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
October 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share