CPAP for Hypoxemic Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease
SIPAP
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Hypoxemic Acute Chest Syndrome in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease
2 other identifiers
interventional
140
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a severe hemoglobinopathy, considered the first monogenic disease in the world. Acute chest syndrome (ACS), one of the most frequent and serious complications of SCD, is defined by the association of fever and/or acute respiratory symptoms with a new pulmonary infiltrate on chest imaging. ACS is characterized by lung consolidation, severe pulmonary vascular dysfunction, with potential role for regional alveolar hypoxia. Therefore, improving alveolar oxygenation and limiting lung consolidation are key objectives of the treatment of ACS, in addition to ensuring pain relief and giving blood transfusions and antibiotics. Bilevel non-invasive ventilation failed in improving outcomes during ACS (Fartoukh 2010). These results are in accordance with those reported in other forms of acute lung injury (Frat 2015), with conflicting results. Among other explanations, NIV may favour high tidal volume ventilation leading to patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) (Carteaux 2016). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a simple to use and affordable technique for non-invasive ventilatory support, that theoretically exposes to a lower risk of P-SILI (Carteaux 2021). In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), applying a positive pressure to the airway opening has been shown to mitigate the reduction in functional residual capacity and to improve respiratory mechanics and gas exchange. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in patients with AHRF, CPAP achieved early physiologic improvement (Delclaux 2000). Recent results also suggest that CPAP reduces the composite outcome of intubation or death in adults with AHRF due to COVID-19 in a large multicentre study (RECOVERY-R) (Perkins 2022). In addition, CPAP can be safely used at early stages in the wards, with a frugal approach, using virtual valves (Carteaux 2021). In patients with SCD, CPAP has shown benefits when used at night in children with sleep apnea (Marshall 2009), or for the peri-operative management (Leff 2007). CPAP is also used in clinical practice for hypoxemic ACS (Heilbronner 2021), but it has not been formally assessed in this setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2028
July 23, 2026
July 1, 2026
2.1 years
July 8, 2026
July 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to résolution of acute chest syndrome (ACS)
time to resolution of ACS, defined as the time from randomization to the joint resolution of fever (body temperature \< 38°C), chest pain (visual analog scale, VAS ≤ 3 cm, morphine ≤ 40mg/24h), dyspnea (VAS ≤ 3 cm, respiratory rate \< 25/min, no ventilatory support), and hypoxemia (SpO2 \> 92% on room air) (Mekontso Dessap, Habibi, et al., 2025). If a VAS is unavailable, a verbal rating scale will be used. Resolution of ACS will be assessed every 8 to 12 hours and will be considered achieved if sustained across 2 to 3 consecutive evaluations (i.e., over a 24-hour period).
Up to randomization
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Mortality
up to hospital discharge or day-28 after randomisation (whichever occurs first), and at 3 months after randomisation.
Length of hospital stay
up to hospital discharge or day-28 after randomisation (whichever occurs first), and at 3 months after randomisation.
Length of ICU stay
up to hospital discharge or day-28 after randomisation (whichever occurs first), and at 3 months after randomisation.
Need for catecholamine infusion
From randomisation to discharge or Day-28
Number of red blood cell units transfused
From randomisation to discharge or Day-28
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
O2+CPAP group
EXPERIMENTALACS episodes assigned to this group will receive supplemental O2 in addition to periods of CPAP.
O2 group
NO INTERVENTIONACS episodes assigned to the O2 group will receive supplemental O2 delivered through nasal cannula or high flow nasal cannula (for needs ≤6, and \>6L/min, respectively) until endotracheal intubation, death, or fulfilment of O2 delivery cessation criteria (SpO2 ≥95% without supplemental O2). SpO2 will be measured on room air, at least every 12 hours.
Interventions
ACS episodes assigned to this group will receive supplemental O2 in addition to periods of CPAP. CPAP will target a positive pressure between 5 and 10 cmH2O. CPAP will be given discontinuously (≥6 hours/day) based on patient tolerance . CPAP sessions will be stopped when the patient achieves the criteria for cessation of supplemental O2. These criteria will be the same as in the O2 group. No sedation will be used for CPAP tolerance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- SCD patient of all genotypes (SS, SC, S/β0 and S/β+)
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Hospitalised for ACS (defined as the association of fever and/or acute respiratory symptoms with a new pulmonary infiltrate on chest imaging)
- Requiring supplemental O2 ≥ 2 L/min for SpO2 ≥ 95%
- Informed consent from the patient
- Affiliated to a social security regime
You may not qualify if:
- Patient having both ACS criteria and need for supplemental O2 ≥ 2 L/min for SpO2 ≥ 95% since more than 48 hours
- Requirement for home supplemental O2 or home CPAP / NIV.
- Signs of worsening respiratory failure mandating intubation (as defined in (Helms et al., 2024))
- Current enrolment in another interventional research concerning a respiratory support during ACS
- Known legal incapacity (patients under guardianship or curatorship)
- Exacerbation of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or another known or suspected chronic respiratory disease
- Absolute contraindications to CPAP, including any of the following: patient not cooperating or opposing the technique, pneumothorax not drained, chest wound blowing, uncontrollable vomiting, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, craniofacial trauma, severe upper airway obstruction, traumatic tetraplegia at the initial phase, cardiac arrest, shock (need for vasopressor), or Coma Glasgow scale \<12.
- Known pregnancy, breast feeding, women with childbearing potential will be tested for pregnancy and excluded if pregnant,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Armand MEKONTSO-DESSAP, MD, PhD
Assistance public Hôpitaux de Paris
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2026
First Posted
July 14, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Last Updated
July 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share