Patient Education and AI-Assisted Complaint Summaries in Endodontic Patients
The Effect of Different Patient Education Methods in Patients Presenting to an Endodontic Clinic With Toothache and the Feasibility of an AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the same-day effects of three standardized patient education methods in adults presenting to an endodontic clinic with toothache. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does standardized verbal education improve patients' knowledge, reduce antibiotic-related misconceptions, and reduce anxiety?
- Does leaflet-based education produce comparable changes in knowledge, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety?
- Does video-based education produce comparable changes in knowledge, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety?
- Does teach-back performance differ according to the method used to deliver patient education?
- Can an AI-assisted three-sentence complaint summary be generated reliably and used as a feasible clinician-facing communication support tool? Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three patient education groups. In the verbal education group, participants will receive a standardized 90-second verbal explanation covering warning signs, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and appropriate antibiotic use. In the leaflet-based education group, participants will review a written leaflet containing the same core educational messages for 90 seconds. In the video-based education group, participants will watch a short video presenting the same core educational messages for 90 seconds. Knowledge level, antibiotic-related misconceptions, and anxiety will be assessed immediately before and immediately after the educational intervention. After education, participants will also be asked to restate the main messages in their own words using a teach-back procedure. In addition, symptom information collected using standardized prompts will be entered into an artificial intelligence tool to generate a concise three-sentence complaint summary. The feasibility, completeness, and clinician-rated usefulness of these summaries will be evaluated as process outcomes. AI-generated summaries will not be used for diagnosis, triage, or treatment decisions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 12, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2026
CompletedJuly 13, 2026
July 1, 2026
3 months
July 7, 2026
July 7, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Patient Knowledge Score
Patient knowledge will be assessed using an 8-item questionnaire developed according to the standardized educational content. Each item will be scored as 1 for a correct response and 0 for an incorrect or unsure response, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge. The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the verbal, leaflet-based, and video-based education groups.
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Change in Antibiotic Misconception Score
Antibiotic-related misconceptions will be assessed using a 5-item Likert-type scale. Each item will be rated from 1 to 5, yielding a total score ranging from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of antibiotic-related misconceptions. The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the three education groups.
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Change in Anxiety Level
Anxiety related to the presenting dental pain will be assessed using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no anxiety and 10 indicates the worst imaginable anxiety. The change score will be calculated as the post-education score minus the baseline score (T1 - T0) and compared among the verbal, leaflet-based, and video-based education groups.
Immediately before the educational intervention and immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Teach-Back Critical Elements Score
Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Teach-Back Global Adequacy Rating
Immediately after the educational intervention on the same day
Generability of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
During the same clinical visit, after collection of standardized symptom information
Completeness of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
Immediately after generation of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
Clinician-Rated Usefulness of the AI-Assisted Complaint Summary
Immediately after review of the AI-assisted complaint summary during the same clinical visit
Study Arms (3)
Standardized Verbal Education
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received a standardized 90-second verbal education session immediately after baseline assessment. The education covered warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain. The content and sequence were delivered using a standardized script.
Leaflet-Based Education
EXPERIMENTALParticipants reviewed a written educational leaflet for 90 seconds immediately after baseline assessment. The leaflet contained the same core messages as the verbal education, including warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
Video-Based Education
EXPERIMENTALParticipants watched a 90-second educational video immediately after baseline assessment. The video presented the same core messages as the verbal and leaflet-based education, including warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain.
Interventions
Participants received a standardized 90-second verbal education session immediately after baseline assessment. The education included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain. A standardized script was used to ensure consistency of content and sequence.
Participants reviewed a written educational leaflet for 90 seconds immediately after baseline assessment. The leaflet included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain. The educational content was equivalent to that provided in the verbal and video groups.
Participants watched a 90-second educational video immediately after baseline assessment. The video included warning signs requiring urgent dental care, appropriate home-care measures, avoidance of potentially harmful practices, and guidance on the appropriate use of antibiotics for dental pain. The educational content was equivalent to that provided in the verbal and leaflet-based education groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Reported pain of at least 1 point on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS ≥ 1) at presentation,
- Were aged 18-65 years,
- Had sufficient cognitive capacity to complete the questionnaires, and
- Provided written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Reported no pain at presentation (NRS = 0) or presented electively/asymptomatically,
- Required immediate emergency clinical evaluation due to signs suggestive of urgent intervention (e.g., marked diffuse swelling, dysphagia, dyspnea),
- Had substantial communication or cognitive difficulties preventing completion of the measures, or
- Were repeat participants (i.e., the same patient re-entering the study).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cukurova University
Adana, Sarıçam, 01250, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Nassar AA, Aboalshamat KT, Alsanei BS, Alghamdi AS, Fudah AA, Alhilou AM. The effect of educational animation compared to leaflets on patients' knowledge regarding root canal treatment: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):808. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05812-5.
PMID: 39075457BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2026
First Posted
July 13, 2026
Study Start
December 15, 2025
Primary Completion
March 12, 2026
Study Completion
April 24, 2026
Last Updated
July 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share