Efficiency Evaluation of Intradiploic Intra-osseus Anesthesia Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
2 other identifiers
interventional
37
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Management of dental pain emergencies is a challenge for the clinician, particularly when pain is due to endodontic infection. Tested hypothesis is intradiploic anesthesia is more effective and quicker than inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular molars anesthesia. The aim of the study is the evaluation of Quicksleeper efficiency used in first intention versus inferior alveolar nerve block used in most current dental treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 15, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedAugust 29, 2014
August 1, 2014
3.9 years
October 15, 2009
August 28, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the Quicksleeper efficiency used in first intention versus inferior alveolar nerve block used in most current dental treatment.
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Quicksleeper intraosseous anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORPulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is managed by Quicksleeper intraosseous anesthesia.
Inferior alveolar nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is managed by inferior alveolar nerve block.
Interventions
Pulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is randomly managed among studied population and Pulp-tester measures anesthesia minute by minute.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Irreversible pulpitis on second mandibular premolar or mandibular molars
- Necessity of pulpotomy or pulpectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy, chest feeding
- Non dental emergency state
- hypersensibility to local anesthesia
- Pheochromocytoma
- Irregularity of cardiac rhythm
- Myocardial infarct in the 6 previous months
- Hepatic porphyria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille
Marseille, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Herve TASSERY
Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 15, 2009
First Posted
August 9, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
September 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 29, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08