Technology-based Distraction Techniques in Managing Children With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Effectiveness of Technology-based Distraction Techniques on Pain Perception of Children With Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder During Different Dental Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of different technology-based distraction techniques on pain perception and dental anxiety in children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder during different dental procedures
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2026
CompletedFebruary 13, 2026
February 1, 2026
5 months
January 14, 2026
February 8, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain-related behavior
Children's behavior using the revised Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (r-FLACC). The r-FLACC scale has been identified as a recommended measurement tool for assessing pain in children aged 0 to 18 years, with a high level of intra- and inter-reliability. Each of the r-FLACC's categories is scored from 0 to 2, which results in a total score between 0 and 10: 0 'relaxed and comfortable'; 1-3 'mild discomfort'; 4-6 'moderate pain'; and 7-10 'severe pain or discomfort or both. The operator assigned a score to each child based on the child's behavior by analysis of the recorded videotape.
The scores were assessed perioperative at 4 procedures: • During needle penetration. • During rubber dam clamp application. • During caries removal. • During placement of composite restoration.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pulse rate
The pulse rate was recorded at the baseline and perioperative during needle penetration, rubber dam clamp application, caries removal, placement of composite restoration, and postoperatively after composite finishing and occlusal adjustment.
Self reported pain
The scale was administered at the baseline (preoperative) and postoperatively at the end of the visit.
Study Arms (3)
Virtual reality glasses
EXPERIMENTALWhite noise
ACTIVE COMPARATORBasic behavior management techniques
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
Children allocated to this group were distracted using VR glasses during dental treatment which is an individual headset that has earphones incorporated. Age-appropriate cartoons and movies were shown to the children. The VR glasses were then introduced to the children. The children were given time to accommodate with the device before starting the procedure. The VR glasses were applied during the treatment.
Wireless kids' headphones were introduced to the children allocated to this group. They were given some time to accommodate with the headphones. Then, the white noise was played and children were asked to concentrate on the music during the procedure. White noise stimulus was set at 70decibels, within the "normal conversation" volume range and below what is considered harmful to hearing. The white noise of rain sound, managed with an iPhone application called Muse. The decibel level of white noise was calibrated using a portable digital sound level meter
Children allocated to this group were managed by the basic behavior guidance techniques: (Tell-ShowDo). No adjunctive distraction tool were used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children diagnosed with ADHD according to the DSM-V criteria and diagnosis confirmed by a pediatric neurologist.
- All children should be on stimulant medication.
- No previous dental experience.
- Written consent of the legal guardian.
You may not qualify if:
- Children with physical disabilities or other psychiatric disorders.
- Children with visual or hearing disabilities.
- Patients requiring emergency treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pediatric Neurology Outpatient Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt
Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, 21527, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nahla A. Aly, MSc
Alexandria University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Amina M. Abdelrahman, PhD
Alexandria University
- STUDY CHAIR
Karin ML Dowidar, PhD
Alexandria University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tarek Omar, PhD
Alexandria University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nourhan M. Aly, PhD
Alexandria University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2026
First Posted
February 13, 2026
Study Start
July 10, 2023
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
February 1, 2024
Last Updated
February 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share