Primary Versus Delayed Wound Closure in Complicated Appendectomy (The HIEDI-Yemen Trial)
HIEDI-Yemen
A Comparative Study of Primary Versus Delayed Wound Closure Using the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage With Irrigation (HIEDI) Technique to Minimize Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Risk in Patients Undergoing Complicated Appendectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare primary wound closure (PC) versus delayed primary closure (DPC) after standardized wound decontamination using the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) technique in patients undergoing open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in Sana'a, Yemen. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does primary closure with HIEDI result in a non-inferior or lower incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) at 30 days compared with delayed primary closure with HIEDI?
- Does primary closure with HIEDI reduce length of hospital stay and improve the trajectory of objective wound healing compared with delayed primary closure with HIEDI?
- What is the impact of each closure method on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life? Researchers will compare the two groups to determine the optimal, evidence-based standard of care for wound management in complicated appendicitis within a resource-limited setting. Participants will:
- Undergo open appendectomy for intraoperatively confirmed complicated appendicitis (perforation or gangrene).
- Receive standardized HIEDI wound decontamination (meticulous debridement and pulsatile irrigation with minimum 500 mL povidone-iodine 1:10 solution).
- Be randomly allocated to either primary closure (all layers closed at surgery) or delayed primary closure (skin/subcutaneous tissue left open and closed 3-5 days later).
- Attend follow-up visits at days 7, 14, and 30 for wound assessment, infection surveillance, and outcome evaluation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2026
July 7, 2026
July 1, 2026
5 months
June 27, 2026
July 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) at 30 Days
Surgical Site Infection (SSI) diagnosed according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria, classified as superficial incisional, deep incisional, or organ/space infection. Assessed by trained outcome assessors blinded to treatment allocation.
Up to 30 days postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Objective Wound Healing Trajectory (ASEPSIS Score)
Day 7, Day 14, and Day 30 postoperatively
Length of Hospital Stay (days)
From admission to discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Incidence of Other Postoperative Complications
Up to 30 days postoperatively
Patient Satisfaction Score (0-100 scale)
Day 7, Day 14, Day 30
Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L score)
Day 7, Day 14, Day 30
Study Arms (2)
Primary Closure with HIEDI
EXPERIMENTALParticipants undergo open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis followed by the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) protocol. All wound layers including skin are closed at the time of initial surgery using the Primary Closure (PC) technique. Target enrollment: 100 participants.
Delayed Primary Closure with HIEDI
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants undergo open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis followed by the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) protocol. Deep fascial layers are closed; subcutaneous tissue and skin are left open, packed with saline-soaked gauze, and closed at the bedside 3-5 days postoperatively if no infection signs are present using the Delayed Primary Closure (DPC) technique. Target enrollment: 100 participants.
Interventions
Following open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, the surgical wound undergoes the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) protocol: meticulous debridement of wound edges and pulsatile high-pressure irrigation with a minimum of 500 mL of povidone-iodine solution (1:10 dilution). All layers of the surgical wound, including the skin, are closed at the time of the initial surgery using standard techniques.
Following open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, the surgical wound undergoes the High-Efficiency Incision and Drainage with Irrigation (HIEDI) protocol: meticulous debridement of wound edges and pulsatile high-pressure irrigation with a minimum of 500 mL of povidone-iodine solution (1:10 dilution). The deep fascial layers are closed; the subcutaneous tissue and skin are left open, packed with saline-soaked gauze, and covered. The wound is closed at the bedside 3-5 days postoperatively if no signs of infection are present.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 12 years and older
- Intraoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis (perforation or gangrene)
- Undergoing open appendectomy via McBurney or Rocky-Davis incision
- Ability to provide written informed consent (patient or legal guardian for minors)
- Availability for 30-day follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Generalized peritonitis requiring midline laparotomy
- Immunocompromised status (e.g., chronic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy, diagnosed HIV infection)
- Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (Hemoglobin A1c \[HbA1c\] greater than 8%)
- Pregnancy
- Concurrent malignancy
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification IV or V
- Laparoscopic appendectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Al-Gumhori Teaching Hospital
Sanaa, Yemen
Al-Kuwaint University Hospital
Sanaa, Yemen
Al-Thawra Modern General Hospital
Sanaa, Yemen
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dr. Yasser Abdurabo Obadiel, Associate Professor
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana'a University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the visible nature of the surgical interventions, blinding of surgeons and patients is not feasible. Outcome assessors evaluating Surgical Site Infection (SSI), data analysts, and laboratory personnel processing wound cultures are blinded to treatment allocation. Group assignments are coded as Group A and Group B until primary analysis is complete.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2026
First Posted
July 7, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Last Updated
July 7, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The study team does not plan to share individual participant data with other researchers. This is a single-center thesis study with limited data management infrastructure, and the dataset contains identifiable clinical information that cannot be sufficiently de-identified for broad sharing under local ethical guidelines.