NCT07682831

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to investigate the ability of a machine learning model to evaluate two-photon fluorescence microscopy images of dermatologic biopsies at point of care. The main question it aims to answer is: • How well do two-photon fluorescence images of biopsies taken in a clinic and evaluated by a machine learning model agree with conventional histology?

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
92

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
11mo left

Started Jun 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress16%
Jun 2026Jul 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2026

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 25, 2026

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 6, 2026

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2027

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 6, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

June 25, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 30, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

two-photon microscopymachine learning

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Sensitivity of Machine Learning Analysis of Two Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Images At Point of Care

    A machine learning model will evaluate TPFM images of patient biopsies at point of care. Sensitivity will be calculated for the machine learning model using two photon fluorescence microscopy images. Sensitivity is defined as the number of true positive diagnoses divided by the sum of true positive and false negative diagnoses among biopsy specimens for which the machine learning model provides a definitive diagnosis. The patient's ultimate clinical diagnosis will serve as the reference standard.

    During or immediately following patient biopsy (same day)

  • Specificity of Machine Learning Analysis of Two Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Images At Point of Care

    A machine learning model will evaluate TPFM images of patient biopsies at point of care. Specificity will be calculated for the machine learning model using two photon fluorescence microscopy images. Specificity is defined as the number of true negative diagnoses divided by the sum of true negative and false positive diagnoses among biopsy specimens for which the machine learning model provides a definitive diagnosis. The patient's ultimate clinical diagnosis will serve as the reference standard.

    During or immediately following patient biopsy (same day)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Proportion of Discordant Diagnoses Attributable to Machine Learning Model Interpretation Errors

    After completion of patient diagnosis (typically 1-2 weeks after procedure)

  • Proportion of Biopsy Specimens With a Definitive Machine Learning Diagnosis

    During or immediately following patient biopsy (same day)

Study Arms (1)

TPFM imaging of biopsy

EXPERIMENTAL

Specimens will be imaged with TPFM and diagnosed using a machine learning model

Device: Two photon microscopy imaging

Interventions

Ex vivo tissues will be imaged with two-photon microscopy and analyzed with machine learning for diagnosis

TPFM imaging of biopsy

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Punch, excisional or shave biopsy specimen

You may not qualify if:

  • Biopsy indication includes melanoma or dysplastic/atypical nevus
  • Excision thickness of less than 1 mm
  • Excision longest dimension less than 2 mm
  • Excision performed as multiple pieces in a single specimen container

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rochester Dermatologic Surgery

Victor, New York, 14654, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Basal CellCarcinoma, Squamous Cell

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Basal CellNeoplasms, Squamous Cell

Central Study Contacts

Michael Giacomelli, Ph.D

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2026

First Posted

July 6, 2026

Study Start

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified sets of two-photon images and corresponding conventional histology will be made available upon request. Links to full resolution image data will be included in publications along with the results of machine learning analysis.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL

Locations