Sensory Motor Control and Muscle Energy Technique for Chronic Mechanical Neck
Effectiveness of Sensory Motor Control and Muscle Energy Techniques on Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Sensory Motor Control training combined with Muscle Energy Technique in reducing pain and improving function, cervical range of motion, proprioception, and kinesiophobia in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
July 2, 2026
January 1, 2026
8 months
June 26, 2026
June 26, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
NPRS
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) will be used to assess the intensity of neck pain experienced by participants. The NPRS is a valid, reliable, and widely used self-reported measure of pain intensity. Participants will be asked to rate their current neck pain on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will select the number that best represents their average pain intensity over the preceding 24 hours. NPRS scores will be recorded at baseline and after completion of the intervention period. A reduction in NPRS score will indicate improvement in pain symptoms. The scale has demonstrated excellent reliability and responsiveness in individuals with musculoskeletal disorders, including chronic mechanical neck pain. Scoring: 0 = No pain 1-3 = Mild pain 4-6 = Moderate pain 7-10 = Severe pain Interpretation: Lower scores indicate lower pain intensity, while higher scores indicate greater pain intensi
From enrollment to pretreatment assesment and than after 6 weeks post treatment assesment measured by NPRS
Secondary Outcomes (4)
NDI
6 WEEKS
Joint Position Error (JPE)
6 WEEKS
INCLINOMETER
6WEEKS
Tampa Scale
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
MET only group
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants allocated to Group A will receive Muscle Energy Technique (MET) using the Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) method targeting the cervical musculature. The intervention will be administered by a licensed physiotherapist and will include treatment of the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid, deep neck flexors, deep neck extensors, and scalene muscles. For each muscle, the therapist will position the muscle at its initial resistance barrier and instruct the participant to perform a gentle isometric contraction (approximately 20-30% of maximal effort) against therapist resistance for 5-10 seconds, followed by complete relaxation. The therapist will then move the muscle to the new barrier and maintain the stretch for 10-15 seconds. This sequence will be repeated 3-5 times for each muscle group. The treatment protocol includes: Upper Trapezius: Side-bending of the cervical spine away from the affected side following isometric contraction. Levator Scapulae:
MET + SMC group
EXPERIMENTALMoist Hot Pack for 10 mins,TENS for 10 mins,Manual therapy for 5 mins,MET + SMC exercercises for neck
Interventions
Participants will receive Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) techniques targeting the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid, deep neck flexors, deep neck extensors, and scalene muscles. Each technique involves a gentle isometric contraction (5-10 seconds) followed by relaxation and stretching to a new barrier, repeated 3-5 times. Both groups will receive hot pack therapy (10 minutes), manual therapy (5 minutes), and MET. The intervention group will additionally receive Sensory Motor Control (SMC) training. Participants will undergo a structured SMC program including oculomotor exercises, head-eye coordination training, figure-of-eight tracking, gaze stability, and gaze-shifting exercises. The program is designed to improve cervical proprioception, postural control, movement accuracy, and range of motion while reducing pain and functional disability in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain. Sessions will be supervised and progressed according to patient tolerance.
articipants in the experimental group will receive a combination of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Sensory Motor Control (SMC) Training. Treatment sessions will be conducted under the supervision of a physiotherapist. MET will be applied to the shortened cervical muscles, including the upper trapezius and levator scapulae, using post-isometric relaxation techniques to reduce muscle tightness, improve cervical mobility, and decrease pain. Following MET, participants will perform a structured SMC training program aimed at improving cervical proprioception, eye-head coordination, gaze stability, movement control, balance, and postural awareness. The SMC program will include the following exercises: Smooth Horizontal and Vertical Tracking: A card measuring approximately 10-15 cm × 7-10 cm will be placed 2 meters from the participant. In Level 1, participants move their eyes while keeping the head stationary; in Level 2, they move the head while maintaining visual fixation on the targe
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Max Spine Rehab Center, Max Health Hospital
Islamabad, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2026
First Posted
July 2, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01