Cholecystitis Outcomes in the Investigation of Cholecystectomy Versus EUS-GBD
CHOICE
Recurrence of Acute Cholecystitis After EUS-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Versus Cholecystectomy in Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
116
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute cholecystitis is common in elderly patients and becomes more frequent with increasing age. Standard treatment is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC), but operative treatment may be associated with increased risk in older patients with substantial comorbidity or reduced tolerance of general anesthesia. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is a minimally invasive internal drainage procedure performed through the stomach or duodenum using endoscopic ultrasound guidance and a lumen-apposing metal stent. This approach may provide an alternative to operative treatment in selected elderly patients. The CHOICE study (CHolecystitis Outcomes in the Investigation of Cholecystectomy versus EUS-GBD) is a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing EUS-GBD with LCC in patients aged 75 years or older with acute cholecystitis. Participants are randomly assigned to undergo either laparoscopic removal of the gallbladder or endoscopic ultrasound-guided internal gallbladder drainage. The objective of the study is to determine whether EUS-GBD provides clinically acceptable outcomes compared with standard operative treatment in this patient population. Participants are followed using medical record review and scheduled follow-up contacts.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 27, 2036
July 2, 2026
June 1, 2026
2.1 years
March 27, 2026
June 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Recurrence rate of cholecystitis within 24 months
Proportion of participants with recurrent acute cholecystitis within 24 months after the index intervention. Recurrent cholecystitis is defined as a new episode of clinically suspected acute cholecystitis supported by radiological findings and elevated inflammatory parameters.
From the index intervention to 24 months after the index intervention
Length of index hospital stay
Duration of the index hospital stay, measured in days from hospital admission for acute cholecystitis to discharge from the index hospitalization.
From hospital admission for acute cholecystitis to discharge from the index hospitalization, assessed up to 90 days
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Duration of antibiotic treatment
From hospital admission for acute cholecystitis to completion of antibiotic treatment for the index episode, assessed up to 90 days
Length of intensive care unit stay
From the index intervention to hospital discharge from the index hospitalization, assessed up to 90 days
Post-interventional complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
From the index intervention to 90 days after the index intervention
Organ-specific postoperative complications
From the index intervention to 90 days after the index intervention
Procedure-specific complications
From the index intervention to 90 days after the index intervention
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LCC
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic cholecystectomy
EUS-GBD
EXPERIMENTALEndoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage
Interventions
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is performed according to each participating hospital's standard operative practice. Briefly, a four-port laparoscopic technique is used. The gallbladder is retracted at the fundus, and the cystic duct and cystic artery are dissected as separate structures. The posterior aspect of the gallbladder is dissected from the liver bed to achieve the critical view of safety. After this has been confirmed, the cystic duct and cystic artery are clipped and divided. The gallbladder is then separated from the liver bed, and the specimen is extracted through one of the port incisions.
EUS-GBD is performed under propofol sedation without airway protection. After sedation, the echoendoscope is advanced through the esophagus into the stomach and duodenum. The gallbladder is identified by ultrasonography, and the optimal site for LAMS placement is determined. The preferred approach is transduodenal access with cholecystoduodenostomy. If safe cystotome puncture cannot be achieved through this route, a transgastric approach with cholecystogastrostomy is used. The operator selects the appropriate LAMS according to the clinical situation, with a 15-mm LAMS used as the standard choice in most cases.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 75 years or older.
- Radiologically confirmed acute cholecystitis.
- Elevated inflammatory parameters.
- Able to provide written informed consent.
- Able to complete follow-up questionnaires.
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 75 years.
- Considered unfit for surgery.
- ASA physical status classification below III.
- Unwillingness to participate in follow-up assessments.
- Lack of written informed consent.
- Clinical Frailty Scale score of 8 or higher.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oulu University Hospitallead
- University of Eastern Finlandcollaborator
- Kuopio University Hospitalcollaborator
- North Karelia Central Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, Oulu, 90220, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PI
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2026
First Posted
July 1, 2026
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 27, 2036
Last Updated
July 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share