Is it Fair to Use Antibiotics After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for the Patients With Acutely Inflamed Gallbladder?
1 other identifier
interventional
198
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During the laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, most surgeons routinely use the postoperative antibiotics after surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the actual need of postoperative antibiotics in these cases and the use of postoperative antibiotics remains controversial. Investigators will compare the surgical outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the patients who has no evidence of systemic infection, according to the usage of postoperative antibiotics or not. The investigators expect that the routine use of postoperative antibiotics after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis gallbladder will have no effects on the postoperative morbidity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 7, 2017
CompletedApril 7, 2017
February 1, 2017
1 year
June 15, 2015
October 20, 2016
February 23, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Infectious Postoperative Complications
Incidence of infectious postoperative complications in patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to grade I Tokyo guidelines for acute cholecystitis or grade II Tokyo guidelines for acute cholecystitis except the evidence of gallbladder perforation, with antibiotics or placebo
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Duration of Hospitalization
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
Study Arms (2)
Group A (cephalosporin)
EXPERIMENTALDuring the period of hospitalization, intake of active drug ('pacetin', 2nd generation cephalosporin). 3 g per day divided into 3 times via intravenous route until the day of discharge. After discharge, oral intakes of 500mg each (1 pill of cefaclor, the 2nd generation cephalosporin every 12 hrs) for three days.
Group B (placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATORDuring the period of hospitalization, Intake of placebo (normal saline). 30cc per day divided into 3 times via intravenous route until the day of discharge. After discharge, oral intakes of 1000mg each (2 pill of vitamin C every 12 hrs) for three days.
Interventions
During the hospitalization, intake of pacetin, 2nd generation cephalosporin. 3 g per day divided into 3 times via intravenous route until the day of discharge. After discharge, oral intakes of 500mg each (1 pill of cefaclor, the 2nd generation cephalosporin every 12 hrs) for three days.
During the period of hospitalization, Intake of placebo (normal saline). 30cc per day divided into 3 times via intravenous route until the day of discharge. After discharge, oral intakes of 1000mg each (2 pill of vitamin C every 12 hrs) for three days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- grade I Tokyo guideline for acute cholecystitis
- grade II Tokyo guideline for acute cholecystitis without the evidence of gallbladder perforation
You may not qualify if:
- chronic cholecystitis
- gallbladder polyp or gallbladder cancer
- the patient who underwent reduced port surgery
- the patient who underwent common bile duct exploration during the operation
- the patient who underwent concurrent operation
- the patient who had past history of upper abdominal surgery
- the patient who had a immunodeficiency state
- the case which had a suspicion of delayed bile leakage
- the case which had a incomplete cystic duct ligation
- the patient who underwent open conversion surgery during the operation
- the patient who had a high risk of bleeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Taeho Honglead
- Incheon St.Mary's Hospitalcollaborator
- Bucheon St. Mary's Hospitalcollaborator
- Uijeongbu St. Mary Hospitalcollaborator
- Catholic University of Korea Saint Paul's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Seoul St. Mary's hospital
Seoul, Seocho-gu, Banopo-dong, 137-701, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Tae-ho Hong
- Organization
- SeoulStmary's hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Taeho Hong
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2015
First Posted
July 3, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 7, 2017
Results First Posted
April 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02