USE LESS, a Comparative Cohort Study of Climate Change Impact From Orthopedic Surgery
USELESS
1 other identifier
observational
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A prospective comparative cohort study with the objective to quantify and compare carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) emissions from orthopedic surgeries performed in two different operating room (OR) settings using different sets of materials and staff.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2025
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
June 18, 2026
June 1, 2026
2 years
June 11, 2026
June 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Climate change impact
Mean carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) emissions expressed in kgs per functional unit defined as one performed surgery. All single-use materials consumed during an operation will be registrered, categorized, weighted and converted into CO₂e using exsisting LCAs or databases. Energy comsuption for machines in the OR, heating and ventilation of the OR and for sterilization of reusable materials will be converted into CO2e using existing databases. Water usage for sterilization will be calculated and converted into CO₂e using databases.
Data cwill be collected during 12 months for each group
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Readmission
within 90 days of the performed sugery
Combustible waste
All consecutive suergeries for twelve months in each group
Costs
All consecutive suergeries for twelve months in each group
Infections
Within 90 days of surgery
Other Outcomes (1)
Hotspot analysis
All consecutive suergeries for twelve months in each group
Study Arms (2)
Control group
Patients undergoing surgical procedures in an operating room at the day surgery department
Intervention group
Patients undergoing surgical procedures in the procedure room at the orthopedic outpatient clinic
Eligibility Criteria
All patients above the age of 18 undergoing stated procedures at Danderyd's hospital.
You may qualify if:
- The following surgeries will be included: release of carpal tunnel or trigger finger, wound revision or amputation of finger or toe, extraction of osteosynthesis material or suturing of extensor tendon (hand or foot) at Danderyd's Hospital.
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Danderyd's Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
Related Publications (10)
Keil M, Viere T, Helms K, Rogowski W. The impact of switching from single-use to reusable healthcare products: a transparency checklist and systematic review of life-cycle assessments. Eur J Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;33(1):56-63. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac174.
PMID: 36433787BACKGROUND8: Ted Schettler, M., Polyvinyl chloride in health care. 2020.
BACKGROUND7: WOLF, M.-A., et al., International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook-general guide for life cycle assessment-detailed guidance. 2010.
BACKGROUNDRizan C, Lillywhite R, Reed M, Bhutta MF. The carbon footprint of products used in five common surgical operations: identifying contributing products and processes. J R Soc Med. 2023 Jun;116(6):199-213. doi: 10.1177/01410768231166135. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
PMID: 37054734BACKGROUNDGrothaus O, Jorgensen A, Maughan G, Anto M, Kazmers NH, Garcia BN. Carbon Footprint of Open Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Performed in the Procedure Room Versus Operating Room Setting. J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Jun;49(6):576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.03.014. Epub 2024 May 6.
PMID: 38713110BACKGROUNDRizan C, Steinbach I, Nicholson R, Lillywhite R, Reed M, Bhutta MF. The Carbon Footprint of Surgical Operations: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):986-995. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003951.
PMID: 32516230BACKGROUND3: Boiko, P., et al., Environmental life cycle assessment of surgical versus conservative care pathways for an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Journal of cleaner production, 2025. 535: p. 147136.
BACKGROUNDEidmann A, Geiger F, Heinz T, Jakuscheit A, Docheva D, Horas K, Stratos I, Rudert M. Our Impact on Global Warming: A Carbon Footprint Analysis of Orthopaedic Operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Nov 6;106(21):1971-1977. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00212. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
PMID: 39503716BACKGROUND1:Pichler, P.-P., et al., International comparison of health care carbon footprints. Environmental research letters, 2019. 14(6): p. 064004
BACKGROUNDShah S, Morris H, Thiagarajah S, Gordon A, Sharma S, Haslam P, Garcia J, Ali F. Handling 'carbon footprint' in orthopaedics. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Jul;106(6):498-503. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0052. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
PMID: 38563077RESULT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2026
First Posted
June 18, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
June 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06