Two Bupivacaine Concentrations for Erector Spinae Plane Block in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
ESPB-PNL
Effects of Two Different Bupivacaine Concentrations in Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain and Inflammatory Biomarkers After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
People who undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), a procedure used to remove kidney stones, often experience pain after surgery. An ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is commonly used to help reduce this pain. This study compares two different concentrations of bupivacaine, a local anesthetic medication, used during ESPB. Participants undergoing PNL will receive either 0.25% or 0.375% bupivacaine as part of their pain management. Researchers will compare pain scores, the need for additional pain medication, and changes in blood markers related to inflammation after surgery. The aim of the study is to determine whether one concentration provides better pain control or influences the inflammatory response differently after PNL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2026
CompletedJune 17, 2026
June 1, 2026
9 months
June 12, 2026
June 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and total opioid consumption
Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10), where higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Pain scores and Total intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption were recorded at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 hours after surgery.
36 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
inflammatory markers
24 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
group 1
0.25% Bupivacaine ESPB
group 2
0.375% bupivacaine ESPB
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane block was performed at the T10 vertebral level before surgery by an experienced anesthesiologist. A total volume of 20 mL bupivacaine was administered. Participants received either 0.25% or 0.375% bupivacaine according to the study cohort. The block was used as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol for postoperative pain management following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consisted of adult patients undergoing elective percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for renal stone disease at a single tertiary care center between July 2024 and March 2025. Eligible participants were 18-70 years of age, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, and received ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as part of perioperative analgesic management. A total of 60 participants were included and prospectively followed throughout the postoperative period.
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 70 years.
- Scheduled to undergo elective percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
- Received ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) before surgery.
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to assess pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
- Advanced cardiovascular disease.
- Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders.
- Opioid use disorder.
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m².
- Infection at the planned injection site.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine, other local anesthetics, or study-related medications.
- Withdrawal of consent during the study period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, Mamak, 06420, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Altiparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal AI, Gumus Demirbilek S. Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block performed with different concentrations of bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia after mastectomy surgery: ramdomized, prospective, double blinded trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0700-3.
PMID: 30832580RESULTForero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
suna akın takmaz, proffessor doctor
University of Health Sciences, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Days
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiology Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 12, 2026
First Posted
June 17, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
March 18, 2025
Study Completion
March 19, 2025
Last Updated
June 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the informed consent obtained from participants did not include permission for public data sharing, and data confidentiality and privacy will be maintained in accordance with institutional and ethical requirements.