Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block for Persistent Back Pain in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Despite adequate control of disease activity with standard medical therapies, there remains an ongoing need for complementary and interventional approaches for the management of persistent back pain in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Although the erector spinae plane block has been described in the literature as a safe and effective analgesic intervention for chronic back pain in various patient populations, to the best of our knowledge, no clinical study has specifically evaluated its use for persistent back pain in patients with ankylosing spondylitis receiving medical treatment. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the effects of erector spinae plane block on pain severity and clinical outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis whose disease activity is controlled under treatment but who continue to experience persistent back pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 2, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 2, 2027
June 8, 2026
June 1, 2026
11 months
June 2, 2026
June 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
The Numeric Rating Scale is used to assess and monitor pain severity. On the scale, "0" indicates no pain, whereas "10" represents the worst pain imaginable. Patients are asked to rate their pain intensity on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Due to its simplicity and ease of understanding, the NRS is widely used in clinical practice and research.
Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), 2 weeks after the erector spinae plane block procedure (T1), and 2 months after the procedure (T2).
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)
Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), 2 weeks after the erector spinae plane block procedure (T1), and 2 months after the procedure (T2).
Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP)
Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), 2 weeks after the erector spinae plane block procedure (T1), and 2 months after the procedure (T2).
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), 2 weeks after the erector spinae plane block procedure (T1), and 2 months after the procedure (T2).
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), 2 weeks after the erector spinae plane block procedure (T1), and 2 months after the procedure (T2).
Istanbul Low Back Pain Functional Scale (ILBPFS)
Assessments will be performed at baseline (T0), 2 weeks after the erector spinae plane block procedure (T1), and 2 months after the procedure (T2).
Study Arms (1)
Patients with ankylosing spondylitis and resistant persistent back pain who underwent erector spinae
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with ankylosing spondylitis whose disease activity is adequately controlled under medical treatment but who are referred due to persistent back pain will undergo erector spinae plane block. All assessments, including pain severity, disease activity, general functional status, and spinal mobility, will be performed at baseline (T0), 2 weeks after the procedure (T1), and 2 months after the procedure (T2).
Interventions
The procedure will be performed in the prone position under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance. Using a 22-gauge needle at the T5-T7 vertebral levels, the fascial plane between the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle group and the transverse process of the vertebra will be accessed. A combination consisting of 5 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine, 4 cc of 0.9% normal saline, and 1 cc dexamethasone (8 mg/2 mL) will then be injected into the targeted plane. The procedure will be performed by experienced algology specialists with more than 15 years of experience in ultrasound-guided interventional procedures and will be administered in two sessions within one week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 65 years
- Diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis according to the Modified New York Criteria
- Patients receiving ongoing treatment with controlled disease activity but persistent back pain
- Willingness to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kg/m²
- History of thoracic surgery
- Intellectual disability or mental retardation
- Presence of major psychiatric comorbidity
- Congenital spinal anomaly
- Pregnancy
- History of bleeding diathesis
- Presence of active local and/or systemic infection
- Known allergy to the medications to be injected
- Hemodynamic instability
- Active phase of the disease (elevated acute phase reactants, active arthritis findings, etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Marmara University Faculty of Medicine Pendik Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Pendik, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fatma B Akdağ, Research Assistant
Marmara University Faculty of Medicine ,Marmara University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Savaş Şencan, Associate Professor
Algology Division, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2026
First Posted
June 8, 2026
Study Start
June 2, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 2, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 2, 2027
Last Updated
June 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share